PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: The current study\'s aim was to evaluate the potential of various fluoride varnishes to remineralize artificial enamel lesions on primary teeth.
UNASSIGNED: For the study, 90 deciduous molar teeth that were implicated for extraction were taken. A window region with a size of 3 × 3 mm was located in the middle of the tooth\'s coronal surface. The remaining portion was given a coat of nail polish and given time to dry. A demineralizing solution was used to create the artificial enamel lesion. The samples were randomized into three experimental groups at random, with 30 samples in each group. Group 1: Application of Clinpro White Varnish, Group 2: Application of Duraphat Varnish, and Group 3: Application of MI Varnish. After 14 days, samples from each group were examined under scanning electron microscopy at a magnification of 1000× to determine whether remineralization had occurred. Microhardness was also determined using a microhardness tester.
UNASSIGNED: Before the intervention, the mean demineralized enamel lesion in the Clinpro White Varnish group was 134.44 ± 0.04, in the Duraphat Varnish group was 133.76 ± 0.12, and in the MI Varnish group was 133.89 ± 0.08. After intervention, the maximum remineralized area was found in the MI Varnish group (82.74 ± 0.18) followed by the Clinpro White Varnish group (101.43 ± 0.16) and the Duraphat Varnish group (104.11 ± 0.10). After the intervention, there was a statistically significant difference found between the groups. After the intervention, the maximum microhardness mean value improved in the MI Varnish group (257.03 ± 1.09 to 261.18 ± 1.20) followed by Clinpro White Varnish (258.78 ± 1.64 to 260.10 ± 1.22) and Duraphat Varnish group (255.24 ± 1.51 to 258.02 ± 0.89).
UNASSIGNED: According to the findings of the current investigation, all of the varnishes utilized in this in vitro experiment are capable of correcting early enamel defects on primary teeth. However, MI Varnish group was very effective compared to the Clinpro White Varnish group and the Duraphat Varnish group.
UNASSIGNED: For the study, 90 deciduous molar teeth that were implicated for extraction were taken. A window region with a size of 3 × 3 mm was located in the middle of the tooth\'s coronal surface. The remaining portion was given a coat of nail polish and given time to dry. A demineralizing solution was used to create the artificial enamel lesion. The samples were randomized into three experimental groups at random, with 30 samples in each group. Group 1: Application of Clinpro White Varnish, Group 2: Application of Duraphat Varnish, and Group 3: Application of MI Varnish. After 14 days, samples from each group were examined under scanning electron microscopy at a magnification of 1000× to determine whether remineralization had occurred. Microhardness was also determined using a microhardness tester.
UNASSIGNED: Before the intervention, the mean demineralized enamel lesion in the Clinpro White Varnish group was 134.44 ± 0.04, in the Duraphat Varnish group was 133.76 ± 0.12, and in the MI Varnish group was 133.89 ± 0.08. After intervention, the maximum remineralized area was found in the MI Varnish group (82.74 ± 0.18) followed by the Clinpro White Varnish group (101.43 ± 0.16) and the Duraphat Varnish group (104.11 ± 0.10). After the intervention, there was a statistically significant difference found between the groups. After the intervention, the maximum microhardness mean value improved in the MI Varnish group (257.03 ± 1.09 to 261.18 ± 1.20) followed by Clinpro White Varnish (258.78 ± 1.64 to 260.10 ± 1.22) and Duraphat Varnish group (255.24 ± 1.51 to 258.02 ± 0.89).
UNASSIGNED: According to the findings of the current investigation, all of the varnishes utilized in this in vitro experiment are capable of correcting early enamel defects on primary teeth. However, MI Varnish group was very effective compared to the Clinpro White Varnish group and the Duraphat Varnish group.
摘要：
■当前研究的目的是评估各种氟化物清漆使乳牙上的人工牙釉质病变再矿化的潜力。
■对于这项研究，取了90颗牵涉到拔牙的乳磨牙。大小为3×3mm的窗口区域位于牙齿冠状表面的中间。剩余部分被给予指甲油涂层并给予干燥时间。使用去矿化溶液来产生人工牙釉质损伤。将样本随机分为三个实验组，每组30个样本。第1组：Clinpro白色清漆的应用，第2组：Duraphat清漆的应用，和组3:MI清漆的应用。14天后,在扫描电子显微镜下以1000倍的放大倍数检查每组的样品，以确定是否发生再矿化。还使用显微硬度计测定显微硬度。
■在干预之前，ClinproWhiteVarnish组的平均脱矿质釉质病变为134.44±0.04，DuraphatVarnish组为133.76±0.12，MIVarnish组为133.89±0.08。干预后,最大再矿化面积出现在MI清漆组(82.74±0.18)，其次是Clinpro白色清漆组(101.43±0.16)和Duraphat清漆组(104.11±0.10)。干预之后,两组之间的差异有统计学意义.干预之后,MI清漆组的最大显微硬度平均值（257.03±1.09至261.18±1.20），其次是Clinpro白色清漆（258.78±1.64至260.10±1.22）和Duraphat清漆组（255.24±1.51至258.02±0.89）。
■根据目前的调查结果，该体外实验中使用的所有清漆都能够纠正乳牙的早期牙釉质缺陷。然而,与Clinpro白色清漆组和Duraphat清漆组相比，MI清漆组非常有效。
■对于这项研究，取了90颗牵涉到拔牙的乳磨牙。大小为3×3mm的窗口区域位于牙齿冠状表面的中间。剩余部分被给予指甲油涂层并给予干燥时间。使用去矿化溶液来产生人工牙釉质损伤。将样本随机分为三个实验组，每组30个样本。第1组：Clinpro白色清漆的应用，第2组：Duraphat清漆的应用，和组3:MI清漆的应用。14天后,在扫描电子显微镜下以1000倍的放大倍数检查每组的样品，以确定是否发生再矿化。还使用显微硬度计测定显微硬度。
■在干预之前，ClinproWhiteVarnish组的平均脱矿质釉质病变为134.44±0.04，DuraphatVarnish组为133.76±0.12，MIVarnish组为133.89±0.08。干预后,最大再矿化面积出现在MI清漆组(82.74±0.18)，其次是Clinpro白色清漆组(101.43±0.16)和Duraphat清漆组(104.11±0.10)。干预之后,两组之间的差异有统计学意义.干预之后,MI清漆组的最大显微硬度平均值（257.03±1.09至261.18±1.20），其次是Clinpro白色清漆（258.78±1.64至260.10±1.22）和Duraphat清漆组（255.24±1.51至258.02±0.89）。
■根据目前的调查结果，该体外实验中使用的所有清漆都能够纠正乳牙的早期牙釉质缺陷。然而,与Clinpro白色清漆组和Duraphat清漆组相比，MI清漆组非常有效。
