PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
OBJECTIVE: To identify and analyze the features and quality of self-management support of mobile applications available in Brazil for chronic low back pain in adults.
METHODS: A systematic review on the Apple Store® and Google Play® digital platforms. The Self-Management Support Assessment Tool scale was used to assess self-management support and the Institute for Healthcare Informatics Functionality Score scale was used to assess functionality.
RESULTS: Seventeen applications were selected, which included around seven self-management skills. The applications that met the majority of self-management support skills were Pathways, Branch, Pancea, Pain Navigator, and Curable. The Curable, Branch and MoovButh applications had the highest scores, with ten features on the functionality scale.
CONCLUSIONS: Some applications have the potential to complement in-person treatment in terms of validity, acceptability and clinical usefulness in pain management. However, barriers such as lack of partnership between healthcare providers and patients, limited evidence-based content, social support, cultural relevance, cost, language, security and privacy can limit their sustained use. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022382686.
METHODS: A systematic review on the Apple Store® and Google Play® digital platforms. The Self-Management Support Assessment Tool scale was used to assess self-management support and the Institute for Healthcare Informatics Functionality Score scale was used to assess functionality.
RESULTS: Seventeen applications were selected, which included around seven self-management skills. The applications that met the majority of self-management support skills were Pathways, Branch, Pancea, Pain Navigator, and Curable. The Curable, Branch and MoovButh applications had the highest scores, with ten features on the functionality scale.
CONCLUSIONS: Some applications have the potential to complement in-person treatment in terms of validity, acceptability and clinical usefulness in pain management. However, barriers such as lack of partnership between healthcare providers and patients, limited evidence-based content, social support, cultural relevance, cost, language, security and privacy can limit their sustained use. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022382686.
摘要：
目的：确定并分析巴西针对成人慢性下腰痛的移动应用程序的自我管理支持功能和质量。
方法：关于AppleStore®和GooglePlay®数字平台的系统综述。自我管理支持评估工具量表用于评估自我管理支持，而医疗保健信息学研究所功能评分量表用于评估功能。
结果：选择了17个应用程序，其中包括大约七项自我管理技能。满足大多数自我管理支持技能的应用程序是Pathways，Branch,Pancea,疼痛导航员,和Curable.TheCurable,Branch和MoovButh申请得分最高，在功能规模上有十个功能。
结论：一些应用有可能在有效性方面补充当面治疗，疼痛管理的可接受性和临床实用性。然而,医疗保健提供者和患者之间缺乏伙伴关系等障碍，有限的循证内容，社会支持,文化相关性,成本,语言,安全和隐私可能会限制它们的持续使用。PROSPERO注册：CRD42022382686。
方法：关于AppleStore®和GooglePlay®数字平台的系统综述。自我管理支持评估工具量表用于评估自我管理支持，而医疗保健信息学研究所功能评分量表用于评估功能。
结果：选择了17个应用程序，其中包括大约七项自我管理技能。满足大多数自我管理支持技能的应用程序是Pathways，Branch,Pancea,疼痛导航员,和Curable.TheCurable,Branch和MoovButh申请得分最高，在功能规模上有十个功能。
结论：一些应用有可能在有效性方面补充当面治疗，疼痛管理的可接受性和临床实用性。然而,医疗保健提供者和患者之间缺乏伙伴关系等障碍，有限的循证内容，社会支持,文化相关性,成本,语言,安全和隐私可能会限制它们的持续使用。PROSPERO注册：CRD42022382686。
