UNASSIGNED: 34 youth with NF1 (Mage = 10.5 ± 1.6 years), completed ASD assessments that combined direct observation and informant ratings to yield a Clinician Best Estimate (CBE) classification. Caregivers rated ASD-related social challenges using the Social Responsiveness Scale- 2nd Edition (SRS-2).
UNASSIGNED: ASD classification varied depending on the method, ranging from 32% using low-threshold SRS-2 cut-scores (T ≥ 60) to under 6% when combining cut scores for diagnostic observational tools and stringent SRS-2 cut-scores (T ≥ 70). 14.7% had a CBE ASD classification. 44% were judged to have autism traits associated with a non-ASD diagnosis. The 52.9% with a suspicion of ADHD had higher SRS-2 scores than those without ADHD, F (7, 26) = 3.45, p < .05, Wilk\'s lambda = 0.518, partial eta squared = 0.482.
UNASSIGNED: Findings highlight the importance of rigorous diagnostic methodology when evaluating ASD in NF1 to inform the selection of targeted interventions for socialization challenges in NF1.
■拥有NF1的34名青年(法师=10.5±1.6岁),完成ASD评估,结合直接观察和线人评级,以产生临床医生最佳估计(CBE)分类。护理人员使用社会反应能力量表-第二版(SRS-2)对与ASD相关的社会挑战进行评分。
■ASD分类因方法而异,使用低阈值SRS-2切割评分(T≥60)的32%到将诊断性观察工具的切割评分和严格的SRS-2切割评分(T≥70)组合在一起时的6%以下。14.7%有CBEASD分类。44%的人被认为具有与非ASD诊断相关的自闭症特征。怀疑多动症的52.9%的人比没有多动症的人有更高的SRS-2评分,F(7,26)=3.45,p<.05,Wilkλ=0.518,部分eta平方=0.482。
■研究结果强调了严格的诊断方法在评估NF1中的ASD时的重要性,为NF1中的社会化挑战选择有针对性的干预措施提供信息。