This scoping review aimed to explore both the quantity and scope of reporting of exercise adherence in published studies of participants with LET.
Six databases were searched to identify original research studies written in English, investigating therapeutic exercise for LET. Eligible studies were first searched for terms related to exercise adherence. If provided, information on the terminology, definition, measurement, results and analysis of adherence were collated and summarised. Recommendations for standardized reporting of exercise adherence were developed.
104 studies were identified, of which 74 (71%) did not report adherence or related terms. Reference to exercise compliance or adherence occurred in 17 and 13 studies respectively. Adherence was most commonly defined as the frequency or percentage of exercise sessions completed compared to the recommendation and measured by self-reported diary. Few studies defined a threshold for adherence, provided comprehensive reporting of results or analysis of exercise adherence.
Reporting of exercise adherence in studies of LET was limited in both quantity and scope. Recommendations are made to improve the quality and consistency of reporting in future studies.
目的:本范围审查旨在探讨已发表的LET参与者研究中运动依从性报告的数量和范围。
方法:搜索了六个数据库,以确定以英语编写的原始研究,研究LET的治疗锻炼。首先搜索与运动依从性相关的术语。如果提供,有关术语的信息,定义,测量,对依从性的结果和分析进行了整理和总结。制定了关于运动依从性标准化报告的建议。
结果:确定了104项研究,其中74例(71%)未报告依从性或相关术语.在17和13项研究中分别提到了运动依从性或依从性。坚持通常定义为与建议相比完成的锻炼次数或百分比,并通过自我报告的日记进行衡量。很少有研究定义了依从性的阈值,提供运动依从性的结果或分析的综合报告。
结论:LET研究中运动依从性的报告在数量和范围上都受到限制。建议在未来的研究中提高报告的质量和一致性。