Abstract：
OBJECTIVE: This study investigates differences in personality characteristics, including perfectionism, ruminative thinking style, and self-compassion, between individuals who have undergone rhinoplasty and a control group without any history of cosmetic surgery.
METHODS: The study included 33 adult patients who underwent rhinoplasty between 2021 and 2023 at Bursa Uludağ University Faculty of Medicine Hospital and 33 adult patients who visited our centre for other complaints as a control group. The rhinoplasty group consisted of primary surgical patients with functional and cosmetic concerns, excluding those who sought revision surgery or had only functional problems. The control group consisted of individuals with no prior cosmetic surgery history and no expectations of aesthetic interventions. Psychiatric analysis was performed using Frost multidimensional perfectionism scale, ruminative thinking style questionnaire, and self-compassion scale.
RESULTS: This research revealed that individuals who had rhinoplasty scored higher in perfectionism 109.3 (±23.3) and ruminative thinking 87.9 (±22) compared to those who did not undergo surgery 94.15 (±22.2) and 77.7 (±23), respectively. Additionally, the rhinoplasty group had lower self-compassion scores, 80.4 (±17.3), than the control group, 86.1 (±11.2). Statistically significant differences were observed in perfectionism between the groups (p = 0.009). In rhinoplasty patients, a notably positive correlation was found between perfectionism and ruminative thinking scores (r = 0.482; p = 0.005), while a moderately significant negative correlation was observed between self-compassion and ruminative thinking scores (r = - 0.465; p = 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: Individuals who undergo rhinoplasty generally show increased levels of perfectionism and are more prone to ruminative thinking. They also demonstrate reduced self-compassion compared to non-surgical control groups. Cosmetic surgeons should be aware of these psychological trends and consider using appropriate scales during pre-surgery consultations and follow-up visits. Adopting this informed approach can improve the surgeon-patient relationship and help overcome communication challenges.
METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
METHODS: The study included 33 adult patients who underwent rhinoplasty between 2021 and 2023 at Bursa Uludağ University Faculty of Medicine Hospital and 33 adult patients who visited our centre for other complaints as a control group. The rhinoplasty group consisted of primary surgical patients with functional and cosmetic concerns, excluding those who sought revision surgery or had only functional problems. The control group consisted of individuals with no prior cosmetic surgery history and no expectations of aesthetic interventions. Psychiatric analysis was performed using Frost multidimensional perfectionism scale, ruminative thinking style questionnaire, and self-compassion scale.
RESULTS: This research revealed that individuals who had rhinoplasty scored higher in perfectionism 109.3 (±23.3) and ruminative thinking 87.9 (±22) compared to those who did not undergo surgery 94.15 (±22.2) and 77.7 (±23), respectively. Additionally, the rhinoplasty group had lower self-compassion scores, 80.4 (±17.3), than the control group, 86.1 (±11.2). Statistically significant differences were observed in perfectionism between the groups (p = 0.009). In rhinoplasty patients, a notably positive correlation was found between perfectionism and ruminative thinking scores (r = 0.482; p = 0.005), while a moderately significant negative correlation was observed between self-compassion and ruminative thinking scores (r = - 0.465; p = 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: Individuals who undergo rhinoplasty generally show increased levels of perfectionism and are more prone to ruminative thinking. They also demonstrate reduced self-compassion compared to non-surgical control groups. Cosmetic surgeons should be aware of these psychological trends and consider using appropriate scales during pre-surgery consultations and follow-up visits. Adopting this informed approach can improve the surgeon-patient relationship and help overcome communication challenges.
METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
摘要：
目的：本研究调查了人格特征的差异，包括完美主义,反思性思维方式，和自我同情，在接受过隆鼻手术的个体和没有任何整容手术史的对照组之间。
方法：该研究包括2021年至2023年在布尔萨乌尔达大学医学院医院接受隆鼻手术的33名成年患者，以及33名成年患者作为对照组，他们访问了我们中心的其他投诉。隆鼻组包括有功能和美容问题的主要手术患者，排除那些寻求翻修手术或仅有功能问题的人。对照组由没有整容手术史和对美学干预没有期望的个体组成。使用Frost多维完美主义量表进行精神病学分析，反思性思维方式问卷，和自我同情量表。
结果：这项研究表明，与未接受手术的94.15（±22.2）和77.7（±23）相比，接受过隆鼻手术的人在完美主义109.3（±23.3）和反思性思维方面得分更高。分别。此外,隆鼻组的自我同情得分较低，80.4(±17.3),比对照组，86.1(±11.2)。两组之间完美主义的差异具有统计学意义（p=0.009）。在隆鼻患者中，完美主义与反思性思维得分呈显著正相关(r=0.482;p=0.005),而在自我同情和反思性思维得分之间观察到中度显着的负相关（r=-0.465；p=0.006）。
结论：接受隆鼻手术的人通常表现出更高的完美主义水平，更倾向于反思性思维。与非手术对照组相比，他们还表现出减少的自我同情心。整形外科医生应该意识到这些心理趋势，并在手术前咨询和随访期间考虑使用适当的量表。采用这种知情的方法可以改善外科医生与患者的关系，并帮助克服沟通挑战。
方法：本期刊要求作者为每篇文章分配一定程度的证据。对于这些循证医学评级的完整描述，请参阅目录或在线作者说明www。springer.com/00266.
方法：该研究包括2021年至2023年在布尔萨乌尔达大学医学院医院接受隆鼻手术的33名成年患者，以及33名成年患者作为对照组，他们访问了我们中心的其他投诉。隆鼻组包括有功能和美容问题的主要手术患者，排除那些寻求翻修手术或仅有功能问题的人。对照组由没有整容手术史和对美学干预没有期望的个体组成。使用Frost多维完美主义量表进行精神病学分析，反思性思维方式问卷，和自我同情量表。
结果：这项研究表明，与未接受手术的94.15（±22.2）和77.7（±23）相比，接受过隆鼻手术的人在完美主义109.3（±23.3）和反思性思维方面得分更高。分别。此外,隆鼻组的自我同情得分较低，80.4(±17.3),比对照组，86.1(±11.2)。两组之间完美主义的差异具有统计学意义（p=0.009）。在隆鼻患者中，完美主义与反思性思维得分呈显著正相关(r=0.482;p=0.005),而在自我同情和反思性思维得分之间观察到中度显着的负相关（r=-0.465；p=0.006）。
结论：接受隆鼻手术的人通常表现出更高的完美主义水平，更倾向于反思性思维。与非手术对照组相比，他们还表现出减少的自我同情心。整形外科医生应该意识到这些心理趋势，并在手术前咨询和随访期间考虑使用适当的量表。采用这种知情的方法可以改善外科医生与患者的关系，并帮助克服沟通挑战。
方法：本期刊要求作者为每篇文章分配一定程度的证据。对于这些循证医学评级的完整描述，请参阅目录或在线作者说明www。springer.com/00266.
