METHODS: A realist review is a theory-driven interpretive approach to evidence synthesis, that brings together qualitative, quantitative, mixed-methods research and grey literature. We will use a realist approach to synthesise data from the available published literature to refine an evidence-based programme theory that will identify the important contextual factors and underlying mechanisms that underpin observed outcomes relating to GP workforce sustainability. Our review will follow Pawson\'s five iterative stages: (1) finding existing theories, (2) searching for evidence, (3) article selection, (4) data extraction and (5) synthesising evidence and drawing conclusions. We will work closely with key stakeholders and embed patient and public involvement throughout the review process to refine the focus of the review and enhance the impact and relevance of our research.
BACKGROUND: This review does not require formal ethical approval as it draws on secondary data from published articles and grey literature. Findings will be disseminated through multiple channels, including publication in peer-reviewed journals, at national and international conferences, and other digital scholarly communication tools such as video summaries, X and blog posts.
UNASSIGNED: CRD42023395583.
方法:现实主义综述是一种理论驱动的证据综合解释方法,汇集了定性的,定量,混合方法研究和灰色文献。我们将使用现实主义的方法来综合现有已发表文献中的数据,以完善基于证据的计划理论,该理论将确定重要的环境因素和潜在机制,以支持与GP劳动力可持续性相关的观察结果。我们的回顾将遵循Pawson的五个迭代阶段:(1)寻找现有理论,(2)寻找证据,(3)文章选择,(4)数据提取和(5)综合证据并得出结论。我们将与主要利益相关者密切合作,并在整个审查过程中嵌入患者和公众的参与,以完善审查的重点并增强我们研究的影响力和相关性。
背景:本评论不需要正式的道德批准,因为它借鉴了已发表的文章和灰色文献中的次要数据。调查结果将通过多种渠道传播,包括在同行评审期刊上发表,在国家和国际会议上,和其他数字学术交流工具,如视频摘要,X和博客文章
■CRD42023395583。