Abstract：
OBJECTIVE: We previously reported that pharmacists working in pharmacies don\'t have enough knowledge and enough experience teaching anaphylaxis (An) and EpiPen use. We administered a questionnaire survey to pharmacists with experience handling EpiPen prescriptions. We investigated the relationship between the questionnaire results and the factors in the pharmacists\' background regarding the explanation and guidance to patients.
RESULTS: The percentage of pharmacists working in pharmacies who provided guidance using visual information and demonstrations was insufficient. Moreover, this figure decreased after the second guidance session. Objective confirmation of patient understanding was also insufficient. The results indicated that self-examination and participation in drug information sessions were important background factors for pharmacists who provided detailed guidance to patients.
CONCLUSIONS: For appropriate long-term management of their condition, An patients must master the EpiPen technique. Pharmacists\' guidance plays a critical role in this regard. A support system should be established for proper instruction of pharmacy patients by improving pharmacists\' self-education and other educational opportunities.
RESULTS: The percentage of pharmacists working in pharmacies who provided guidance using visual information and demonstrations was insufficient. Moreover, this figure decreased after the second guidance session. Objective confirmation of patient understanding was also insufficient. The results indicated that self-examination and participation in drug information sessions were important background factors for pharmacists who provided detailed guidance to patients.
CONCLUSIONS: For appropriate long-term management of their condition, An patients must master the EpiPen technique. Pharmacists\' guidance plays a critical role in this regard. A support system should be established for proper instruction of pharmacy patients by improving pharmacists\' self-education and other educational opportunities.
摘要：
目的：我们以前报道过，在药店工作的药剂师没有足够的知识和足够的经验来教授过敏反应（An）和EpiPen的使用。我们对具有处理EpiPen处方经验的药剂师进行了问卷调查。我们调查了问卷结果与药剂师背景中关于患者解释和指导的因素之间的关系。
结果：在药房工作的药剂师使用视觉信息和演示提供指导的百分比不足。此外，在第二次指导会议之后，这一数字有所下降。患者理解的客观确认也不足。结果表明，自我检查和参与药物信息会议是药师为患者提供详细指导的重要背景因素。
结论：为了对其病情进行适当的长期管理，患者必须掌握EpiPen技术。药剂师的指导在这方面起着至关重要的作用。应建立支持系统，通过改善药剂师的自我教育和其他教育机会，对药房患者进行适当的指导。
结果：在药房工作的药剂师使用视觉信息和演示提供指导的百分比不足。此外，在第二次指导会议之后，这一数字有所下降。患者理解的客观确认也不足。结果表明，自我检查和参与药物信息会议是药师为患者提供详细指导的重要背景因素。
结论：为了对其病情进行适当的长期管理，患者必须掌握EpiPen技术。药剂师的指导在这方面起着至关重要的作用。应建立支持系统，通过改善药剂师的自我教育和其他教育机会，对药房患者进行适当的指导。
