Abstract：
BACKGROUND: This systematic review delves into the impact of social media on self-perception and the escalating interest in clinical aesthetic procedures, proposing that social media significantly influences beauty standards and increases demand for aesthetic enhancements.
METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, a mixed-method analysis of 34 articles was conducted, sourced from various databases, focusing on social media\'s psychological effects on clinical aesthetics decisions. The studies encompassed a broad spectrum, including qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methodologies, reflecting diverse geographical and cultural perspectives.
RESULTS: The quantitative analysis demonstrated a strong positive correlation between social media usage and the consideration of aesthetic procedures (r=0.45, p<0.001), indicating a significant impact. Specific findings included a large effect size (Cohen\'s d=0.8) for the relationship between time spent on social media and the desire for aesthetic enhancements. Individuals spending more than 3 hours per day on social media platforms were twice as likely to consider aesthetic procedures compared to those with less usage, with a 95% confidence interval indicating robustness in these findings.
CONCLUSIONS: Confirming the reinforcing effect of social media on aesthetic decision-making, this study highlights the complex interplay between digital media exposure, altered self-perception, and the increased inclination towards aesthetic procedures. It suggests a critical need for practitioners to carefully navigate the digital influence on patient\'s desires, reinforcing the significance of understanding psychological motivations and societal pressures in clinical aesthetics. This comprehensive analysis offers pivotal insights for clinical practice and ongoing research into social media\'s role in contemporary beauty standards.
METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, a mixed-method analysis of 34 articles was conducted, sourced from various databases, focusing on social media\'s psychological effects on clinical aesthetics decisions. The studies encompassed a broad spectrum, including qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methodologies, reflecting diverse geographical and cultural perspectives.
RESULTS: The quantitative analysis demonstrated a strong positive correlation between social media usage and the consideration of aesthetic procedures (r=0.45, p<0.001), indicating a significant impact. Specific findings included a large effect size (Cohen\'s d=0.8) for the relationship between time spent on social media and the desire for aesthetic enhancements. Individuals spending more than 3 hours per day on social media platforms were twice as likely to consider aesthetic procedures compared to those with less usage, with a 95% confidence interval indicating robustness in these findings.
CONCLUSIONS: Confirming the reinforcing effect of social media on aesthetic decision-making, this study highlights the complex interplay between digital media exposure, altered self-perception, and the increased inclination towards aesthetic procedures. It suggests a critical need for practitioners to carefully navigate the digital influence on patient\'s desires, reinforcing the significance of understanding psychological motivations and societal pressures in clinical aesthetics. This comprehensive analysis offers pivotal insights for clinical practice and ongoing research into social media\'s role in contemporary beauty standards.
METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
摘要：
背景：本系统综述探讨了社交媒体对自我感知的影响以及对临床美学程序的兴趣不断上升，提出社交媒体会显著影响美容标准，并增加对美学增强的需求。
方法：遵循PRISMA指南，对34篇文章进行了混合方法分析，来自各种数据库，关注社交媒体对临床美学决策的心理影响。这些研究涵盖了广泛的范围，包括定性的，定量,和混合的方法，反映不同的地理和文化观点。
结果：定量分析表明，社交媒体使用与美学程序的考虑之间存在很强的正相关关系（r=0.45，p<0.001），表明了重大影响。具体发现包括在社交媒体上花费的时间与审美增强的愿望之间的关系的大效应大小（科恩的d=0.8）。与使用较少的人相比，每天在社交媒体平台上花费超过3小时的人考虑美学程序的可能性是后者的两倍。95%的置信区间表明这些发现的稳健性。
结论：确认社交媒体对审美决策的强化作用，这项研究强调了数字媒体曝光之间复杂的相互作用，改变了自我感知，以及越来越倾向于美学程序。这表明从业者迫切需要仔细浏览数字对患者欲望的影响，加强理解心理动机和社会压力在临床美学中的重要性。这种综合分析为临床实践和正在进行的社交媒体在当代美容标准中的作用研究提供了关键的见解。
方法：本期刊要求作者为每篇文章分配一定程度的证据。对于这些循证医学评级的完整描述，请参阅目录或在线作者说明www。springer.com/00266.
方法：遵循PRISMA指南，对34篇文章进行了混合方法分析，来自各种数据库，关注社交媒体对临床美学决策的心理影响。这些研究涵盖了广泛的范围，包括定性的，定量,和混合的方法，反映不同的地理和文化观点。
结果：定量分析表明，社交媒体使用与美学程序的考虑之间存在很强的正相关关系（r=0.45，p<0.001），表明了重大影响。具体发现包括在社交媒体上花费的时间与审美增强的愿望之间的关系的大效应大小（科恩的d=0.8）。与使用较少的人相比，每天在社交媒体平台上花费超过3小时的人考虑美学程序的可能性是后者的两倍。95%的置信区间表明这些发现的稳健性。
结论：确认社交媒体对审美决策的强化作用，这项研究强调了数字媒体曝光之间复杂的相互作用，改变了自我感知，以及越来越倾向于美学程序。这表明从业者迫切需要仔细浏览数字对患者欲望的影响，加强理解心理动机和社会压力在临床美学中的重要性。这种综合分析为临床实践和正在进行的社交媒体在当代美容标准中的作用研究提供了关键的见解。
方法：本期刊要求作者为每篇文章分配一定程度的证据。对于这些循证医学评级的完整描述，请参阅目录或在线作者说明www。springer.com/00266.
