PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
The purpose of this research was to use a historical method and core principles from scientific philosophy to explain why mistakes were made in the development of the lactic acidosis construct. On a broader scope, this research explains what science is, why some scientists despite good intention, often get it wrong, and why it takes so long (decades) to correct these errors. Science is a human behaviour that consists of the identification of a problem based on the correct application of prior knowledge, the development of a method to best resolve or test the problem, completion of these methods to acquire results, and then a correct interpretation of the results. If these steps are done correctly there is an increased probability (no guarantee) that the outcome is likely to be correct. Thomas Kuhn proposed that you can understand what science is from how it has been performed, and from his essays he revealed a very dysfunctional form of science that he called \'normal\' (due the preponderance of its presence) science. Conversely, Karl Popper was adamant that the practice of \'normal\' science revealed numerous flaws that deviate from fundamental principles that makes science, science. Collectively, the evidence reveals that within the sports medicine and health sciences, as with all disciplines, errors in science are more frequent than you might expect. There is an urgent need to improve how we educate and train scientists to prevent the pursuit of \'normal\' science and the harm it imparts on humanity.
摘要：
这项研究的目的是使用科学哲学的历史方法和核心原理来解释为什么在乳酸性酸中毒构造的发展中犯了错误。在更广泛的范围内，这项研究解释了什么是科学，为什么一些科学家尽管有良好的意图，经常弄错，以及为什么需要这么长时间（几十年）来纠正这些错误。科学是一种人类行为，包括基于正确应用先验知识来识别问题，开发一种最佳解决或测试问题的方法，完成这些方法以获得结果，然后对结果进行正确的解释。如果这些步骤正确完成，则结果可能正确的可能性会增加（不能保证）。托马斯·库恩提出，你可以从科学的表现来理解什么是科学，从他的论文中，他揭示了一种功能失调的科学形式，他称之为“正常”（由于其存在的优势）。相反，卡尔·波普尔坚持认为，“正常”科学的实践揭示了许多缺陷，这些缺陷偏离了科学的基本原理，科学。总的来说，证据表明，在运动医学和健康科学中，和所有学科一样，科学中的错误比你想象的更频繁。迫切需要改进我们如何教育和培训科学家，以防止对“正常”科学的追求及其对人类的危害。
