PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
In simple terms, consciousness is constituted by multiple goals for action and the continuous adjudication of such goals to implement action, which is referred to as the maps of meaning (MoM) consciousness theory. The MoM theory triangulates through three parallel corollaries: action (behavior), mechanism (morphology/pathophysiology), and goals (teleology). (1) An organism\'s consciousness contains fluid, nested goals. These goals are not intentionality, but intersectionality, via the Darwinian byproduct of embodiment meeting the world, i.e., Darwinian inclusive fitness or randomization and then survival of the fittest. (2) These goals are formed via a gradual descent under inclusive fitness and are the abstraction of a \"match\" between the evolutionary environment and the organism. (3) Human consciousness implements the brain efficiency hypothesis, genetics, epigenetics, and experience-crystallized efficiencies, not necessitating best or objective but fitness, i.e., perceived efficiency based on one\'s adaptive environment. These efficiencies are objectively arbitrary but determine the operation and level of one\'s consciousness, termed as extreme thrownness. (4) Since inclusive fitness drives efficiencies in the physiologic mechanism, morphology, and behavior (action) and originates one\'s goals, embodiment is necessarily entangled to human consciousness as it is at the intersection of mechanism or action (both necessitating embodiment) occurring in the world that determines fitness. (5) Perception is the operant process of consciousness and is the de facto goal adjudication process of consciousness. Goal operationalization is fundamentally efficiency-based via one\'s unique neuronal mapping as a byproduct of genetics, epigenetics, and experience. (6) Perception involves information intake and information discrimination, equally underpinned by efficiencies of inclusive fitness via extreme thrownness. Perception is not a \'frame rate\' but Bayesian priors of efficiency based on one\'s extreme thrownness. (7) Consciousness and human consciousness are modular (i.e., a scalar level of richness, which builds up like building blocks) and dimensionalized (i.e., cognitive abilities become possibilities as the emergent phenomena at various modularities such as the stratified factors in factor analysis). (8) The meta dimensions of human consciousness seemingly include intelligence quotient, personality (five-factor model), richness of perception intake, and richness of perception discrimination, among other potentialities. (9) Future consciousness research should utilize factor analysis to parse modularities and dimensions of human consciousness and animal models.
摘要：
简单来说,意识是由行动的多个目标和实施行动的这些目标的持续裁决构成的，这被称为意义图(MoM)意识理论。MoM理论通过三个平行的推论进行三角剖分：动作(行为)，机制（形态学/病理生理学），和目标（目的论）。(1)有机体的意识含有液体，嵌套目标。这些目标不是故意的，但是交叉性，通过与世界相遇的达尔文式副产品，即，达尔文的包容性适应度或随机化，然后适者生存。（2）这些目标是通过包容性适应性下的逐渐下降形成的，并且是进化环境与生物体之间的“匹配”的抽象。(3)人类意识贯彻大脑效率假说,遗传学,表观遗传学,和经验结晶的效率，不需要最好或客观，但适合，即，基于一个人的适应环境的感知效率。这些效率在客观上是任意的，但决定了一个人意识的运作和水平，被称为极端沮丧。(4)由于包容性健身驱动生理机制的效率，形态学,和行为(行动)，并产生一个人的目标，实施例必然与人类意识纠缠在一起，因为它是在决定健康的世界中发生的机制或动作（两者都是必要的实施例）的交叉点。(5)知觉是意识的运作过程,是意识的事实上的目标裁决过程。目标操作基本上是基于效率通过一个独特的神经元作图作为遗传学的副产品，表观遗传学,和经验。(6)感知涉及信息摄取和信息辨别，同样由通过极端投入实现包容性健身的效率支撑。感知不是“帧速率”，而是基于一个人的极端投入的效率的贝叶斯先验。（7）意识和人类意识是模块化的（即，标量的丰富程度，它像积木一样构建起来)和维度化(即，认知能力成为各种模块化的新兴现象，例如因子分析中的分层因素）。(8)人类意识的元维度似乎包括智商，人格（五因素模型），丰富的感知摄入，以及丰富的感知歧视，在其他潜力中。（9）未来的意识研究应利用因子分析来解析人类意识和动物模型的模块化和维度。
