METHODS: In this paper, the transformation invariant loss function with distance equilibrium (TIDLE) loss function is applied to IPPG for the first time, and the details of BVP signal can be recovered better. In detail, TIDLE is tested in four commonly used IPPG deep learning models, which are DeepPhys, EfficientPhys, Physnet and TS_CAN, and compared with other three loss functions, which are mean absolute error (MAE), mean square error (MSE), Neg Pearson Coefficient correlation (NPCC).
RESULTS: The experiments demonstrate that MAE and MSE exhibit suboptimal performance in predicting LF/HF across the four models, achieving the Statistic of Mean Absolute Error (MAES) of 25.94% and 34.05%, respectively. In contrast, NPCC and TIDLE yielded more favorable results at 13.51% and 11.35%, respectively. Taking into consideration the morphological characteristics of the BVP signal, on the two optimal models for predicting HRV metrics, namely DeepPhys and TS_CAN, the Pearson coefficients for the BVP signals predicted by TIDLE in comparison to the gold-standard BVP signals achieved values of 0.627 and 0.605, respectively. In contrast, the results based on NPCC were notably lower, at only 0.545 and 0.533, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This paper contributes significantly to the effective restoration of the morphology and frequency domain characteristics of the BVP signal.
方法:在本文中,首次将具有距离平衡的变换不变损失函数(TIDLE)损失函数应用于IPPG,能较好地恢复BVP信号的细节。详细来说,TIDLE在四种常用的IPPG深度学习模型中进行了测试,是DeepPhys,EfficientPhys,Physnet和TS_CAN,与其他三个损失函数相比,是MAE,MSE,NPCC。
结果:实验表明,MAE和MSE在预测四个模型的LF/HF方面表现出次优的性能,实现了25.94%和34.05%的平均绝对误差(MAES)统计,分别。相比之下,NPCC和TIDLE取得了更有利的结果,分别为13.51%和11.35%,分别。考虑到BVP信号的形态特征,关于预测HRV度量的两个最优模型,即DeepPhys和TS_CAN,与黄金标准BVP信号相比,TIDLE预测的BVP信号的皮尔逊系数分别达到0.627和0.605的值。相比之下,基于NPCC的结果明显较低,分别只有0.545和0.533。
结论:本文对有效恢复BVP信号的形态和频域特征做出了重大贡献。