PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: To assess the function of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) both only and in combination with bioactive glass in intrabony defects.
UNASSIGNED: Twenty patients were split into two groups with 10 samples each: group I with PRP alone, whereas group II was done with PRP in addition to bioactive glass. Following local anesthesia, full-thickness mucoperiosteal flaps were elevated in the afflicted site, the defect was debrided, and root planning with curettes was performed. Irrigation was then used while in group II- PRP along with bone graft (BG) preservationwas done. Suturing in group I was contained. At day 0 (baseline) and 6 months after surgery, the clinical parameters for probing depth, clinical attachment stage, and radiographic assessment were noted for both groups.
UNASSIGNED: When comparing both groups, there was no statistically considerable variation. However, the intragroup comparison for pocket depth and clinical attachment level between baseline and 6 months was significant. Radiographic bone level was not considerably dissimilar across groups; however, it was significantly different between groups.
UNASSIGNED: Reduced probing depth, higher clinical attachment level, and radiographic evidence of bone fill are clinical outcome measures that are associated with effective regenerative therapy.
UNASSIGNED: Twenty patients were split into two groups with 10 samples each: group I with PRP alone, whereas group II was done with PRP in addition to bioactive glass. Following local anesthesia, full-thickness mucoperiosteal flaps were elevated in the afflicted site, the defect was debrided, and root planning with curettes was performed. Irrigation was then used while in group II- PRP along with bone graft (BG) preservationwas done. Suturing in group I was contained. At day 0 (baseline) and 6 months after surgery, the clinical parameters for probing depth, clinical attachment stage, and radiographic assessment were noted for both groups.
UNASSIGNED: When comparing both groups, there was no statistically considerable variation. However, the intragroup comparison for pocket depth and clinical attachment level between baseline and 6 months was significant. Radiographic bone level was not considerably dissimilar across groups; however, it was significantly different between groups.
UNASSIGNED: Reduced probing depth, higher clinical attachment level, and radiographic evidence of bone fill are clinical outcome measures that are associated with effective regenerative therapy.
摘要：
■评估仅富含血小板的血浆（PRP）以及与生物活性玻璃组合在骨内缺损中的功能。
■将20例患者分为两组，每组10例：I组，仅PRP，而II组除生物活性玻璃外还使用PRP。局部麻醉后,全层粘膜骨膜瓣在患病部位升高，这个缺陷被清创了,并用刮匙进行根规划。然后使用冲洗，而在第II组-PRP和骨移植物（BG）保存。我被包含在小组中。在手术后第0天（基线）和6个月，探测深度的临床参数，临床依恋阶段，两组均记录了影像学评估结果.
■比较两组时，在统计学上没有相当大的差异。然而,基线和6个月之间的口袋深度和临床附着水平的组内比较具有显著性.各组的影像学骨水平没有明显差异；然而，组间差异显著.
■减小探测深度，更高的临床依恋水平，骨填充的影像学证据是与有效再生治疗相关的临床结果指标。
■将20例患者分为两组，每组10例：I组，仅PRP，而II组除生物活性玻璃外还使用PRP。局部麻醉后,全层粘膜骨膜瓣在患病部位升高，这个缺陷被清创了,并用刮匙进行根规划。然后使用冲洗，而在第II组-PRP和骨移植物（BG）保存。我被包含在小组中。在手术后第0天（基线）和6个月，探测深度的临床参数，临床依恋阶段，两组均记录了影像学评估结果.
■比较两组时，在统计学上没有相当大的差异。然而,基线和6个月之间的口袋深度和临床附着水平的组内比较具有显著性.各组的影像学骨水平没有明显差异；然而，组间差异显著.
■减小探测深度，更高的临床依恋水平，骨填充的影像学证据是与有效再生治疗相关的临床结果指标。
