Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: Accurate assessment of burn depth and burn wound healing potential is essential to determine early treatments. Infrared thermography (IRT) is a non-invasive and objective tool to do this. This systematic review evaluated the accuracy of IRT to determine burn wound healing potential.
UNASSIGNED: This systematic review and meta-analysis used MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro, DiTA and CENTRAL databases. IRT data were extracted from primary studies and categorised into four cells (i.e., true positives, false positives, true negatives and false negatives). Subgroup analysis was performed according to methods used to capture thermal images.
UNASSIGNED: The search strategy identified 2727 publications; however, 15 articles were selected for review and 11 for meta-analysis. In our meta-analysis, the accuracy of IRT was 84.8% (63% sensitivity and 81.9% specificity).
UNASSIGNED: IRT is a moderately accurate tool to identify burn depth and healing potential. Thus, IRT should be used carefully for evaluating burn wounds.
UNASSIGNED: This systematic review and meta-analysis used MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro, DiTA and CENTRAL databases. IRT data were extracted from primary studies and categorised into four cells (i.e., true positives, false positives, true negatives and false negatives). Subgroup analysis was performed according to methods used to capture thermal images.
UNASSIGNED: The search strategy identified 2727 publications; however, 15 articles were selected for review and 11 for meta-analysis. In our meta-analysis, the accuracy of IRT was 84.8% (63% sensitivity and 81.9% specificity).
UNASSIGNED: IRT is a moderately accurate tool to identify burn depth and healing potential. Thus, IRT should be used carefully for evaluating burn wounds.
摘要：
■准确评估烧伤深度和烧伤伤口愈合潜力对于确定早期治疗至关重要。红外热成像（IRT）是一种非侵入性和客观的工具。这项系统评价评估了IRT确定烧伤伤口愈合潜力的准确性。
■本系统综述和荟萃分析使用MEDLINE，EMBASE,CINAHL,PEDro,DiTA和CENTRAL数据库。IRT数据是从初级研究中提取的，并分类为四个细胞(即，真正的积极因素，假阳性,真阴性和假阴性)。根据用于捕获热图像的方法进行亚组分析。
■搜索策略确定了2727种出版物；但是，选择15篇文章进行综述，11篇进行荟萃分析。在我们的荟萃分析中，IRT的准确性为84.8%(63%的敏感性和81.9%的特异性).
■IRT是识别烧伤深度和愈合潜力的中等精确工具。因此，应仔细使用IRT评估烧伤创面。
■本系统综述和荟萃分析使用MEDLINE，EMBASE,CINAHL,PEDro,DiTA和CENTRAL数据库。IRT数据是从初级研究中提取的，并分类为四个细胞(即，真正的积极因素，假阳性,真阴性和假阴性)。根据用于捕获热图像的方法进行亚组分析。
■搜索策略确定了2727种出版物；但是，选择15篇文章进行综述，11篇进行荟萃分析。在我们的荟萃分析中，IRT的准确性为84.8%(63%的敏感性和81.9%的特异性).
■IRT是识别烧伤深度和愈合潜力的中等精确工具。因此，应仔细使用IRT评估烧伤创面。
