METHODS: A search of the English published literature was conducted on the Pubmed, Scopus and Cochrane databases following PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS: A total of 441 titles were retrieved from the search. After full-text screening and application of inclusion/exclusion criteria, 12 articles were included. We found no significant differences between TLM and RT treatment in the considered acoustic analysis parameters, except for Shimmer, with more favorable values reported in the RT group.
CONCLUSIONS: Considering the spread of the disease and expecting an improvement in long-term survival over time, well-designed and multicentric studies involving larger populations with a long-term follow up are mandatory to better assess objective voice outcomes in terms of spectro-acoustic voice parameters.
方法:在Pubmed,Scopus和Cochrane数据库遵循PRISMA指南。
结果:从搜索中总共检索到441个标题。在全文筛选和应用纳入/排除标准后,包括12篇文章。我们发现TLM和RT治疗在考虑的声学分析参数中没有显着差异,除了Shimmer,在RT组中报告了更有利的值。
结论:考虑到疾病的传播,并期望随着时间的推移,长期生存率得到改善,必须进行设计良好的多中心研究,并对更多人群进行长期随访,以更好地评估频谱声学语音参数方面的客观语音结果.