PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
BACKGROUND: Limited evidence is available that focuses on beans within American dietary patterns and health. The purpose of this study was to identify commonly consumed adult dietary patterns that included beans and compare shortfall nutrient intakes and diet quality, relative to adults whose typical dietary pattern did not include beans.
METHODS: The analyses used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001-2018. Cluster analysis was used to identify bean patterns of consumption, while the USDA food coding system defined daily beans consumed. Five bean dietary patterns of consumption were identified, of which four patterns included both canned beans and dry beans, while one pattern had no bean consumption. Bean consumption was defined as those consuming kidney beans, black beans, chickpeas, and/or pinto beans.
RESULTS: Adults consuming Bean Dietary Patterns 1, 2, 3 and 4 had significantly higher diet quality scores (as assessed by USDA\'s Healthy Eating Index-2015) compared to the no-bean pattern (61.2 ± 0.5, 58.9 ± 0.5, 55.2 ± 0.4 and 56.5 ± 0.8 vs 48.8 ± 0.2 p\'s < 0.0001). Bean consumers also had significantly higher intakes of several shortfall nutrients (choline, alpha-linolenic acid, folate, iron, magnesium and vitamin E) relative to non-consumers of beans. Similarly, intake of dietary fiber, potassium and calcium, all nutrients of public health concern were significantly higher in bean patterns compared to no-beans. Bean Dietary Pattern 1 (~ 13.5% of total daily kcal from beans or ~ 2 servings of beans/day) and 2 (~ 9.5% of total daily kcal from beans or ~ 1.7 servings of beans/day) were significantly associated with lower BMI, decreased body weight and improved waist circumference relative to no-beans.
CONCLUSIONS: Dietary patterns that are rich in canned and dry beans were associated with significantly higher diet quality scores and greater intake of shortfall nutrients, including nutrients of public health concern. Bean dietary patterns were also associated with improved weight-related outcomes. Dietary guidance should consider the nutrient and health benefits associated with the promotion of increased canned and dry bean consumption in American dietary patterns.
METHODS: The analyses used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001-2018. Cluster analysis was used to identify bean patterns of consumption, while the USDA food coding system defined daily beans consumed. Five bean dietary patterns of consumption were identified, of which four patterns included both canned beans and dry beans, while one pattern had no bean consumption. Bean consumption was defined as those consuming kidney beans, black beans, chickpeas, and/or pinto beans.
RESULTS: Adults consuming Bean Dietary Patterns 1, 2, 3 and 4 had significantly higher diet quality scores (as assessed by USDA\'s Healthy Eating Index-2015) compared to the no-bean pattern (61.2 ± 0.5, 58.9 ± 0.5, 55.2 ± 0.4 and 56.5 ± 0.8 vs 48.8 ± 0.2 p\'s < 0.0001). Bean consumers also had significantly higher intakes of several shortfall nutrients (choline, alpha-linolenic acid, folate, iron, magnesium and vitamin E) relative to non-consumers of beans. Similarly, intake of dietary fiber, potassium and calcium, all nutrients of public health concern were significantly higher in bean patterns compared to no-beans. Bean Dietary Pattern 1 (~ 13.5% of total daily kcal from beans or ~ 2 servings of beans/day) and 2 (~ 9.5% of total daily kcal from beans or ~ 1.7 servings of beans/day) were significantly associated with lower BMI, decreased body weight and improved waist circumference relative to no-beans.
CONCLUSIONS: Dietary patterns that are rich in canned and dry beans were associated with significantly higher diet quality scores and greater intake of shortfall nutrients, including nutrients of public health concern. Bean dietary patterns were also associated with improved weight-related outcomes. Dietary guidance should consider the nutrient and health benefits associated with the promotion of increased canned and dry bean consumption in American dietary patterns.
摘要：
背景：有限的证据集中在美国饮食模式和健康中的豆类上。这项研究的目的是确定包括豆类在内的成人常见饮食模式，并比较营养摄入量和饮食质量的不足，相对于典型饮食模式不包括豆类的成年人。
方法：分析使用了国家健康和营养调查的数据，2001-2018。聚类分析用于确定豆类的消费模式，而美国农业部的食物编码系统定义了每天食用的豆类。确定了五种豆类饮食模式，其中四种模式包括罐头豆和干豆，而一种模式没有豆类消费。豆类消费被定义为食用菜豆的人，黑豆,鹰嘴豆,和/或平托豆。
结果：食用豆类饮食模式1、2、3和4的成年人的饮食质量评分（根据美国农业部2015年健康饮食指数评估）明显高于无豆模式（61.2±0.5、58.9±0.5、55.2±0.4和56.5±0.8vs48.8±0.2p's<0.0001）。豆类消费者对几种营养素的摄入量也明显较高(胆碱，α-亚麻酸,叶酸,铁,镁和维生素E）相对于非豆类消费者。同样，膳食纤维的摄入量，钾和钙，与无豆相比，豆类模式中所有公共卫生关注的营养素均显着较高。豆类饮食模式1（约占豆类每日总千卡的13.5％或约2份/天）和2（约占豆类每日总千卡的9.5％或约1.7份/天）与较低的BMI，相对于无豆，体重减轻，腰围改善。
结论：富含罐装和干豆的饮食模式与更高的饮食质量评分和更多的营养摄入相关，包括公共卫生关注的营养素。豆类饮食模式也与体重相关结果的改善有关。饮食指导应考虑与促进美国饮食模式中罐装和干豆消费增加相关的营养和健康益处。
方法：分析使用了国家健康和营养调查的数据，2001-2018。聚类分析用于确定豆类的消费模式，而美国农业部的食物编码系统定义了每天食用的豆类。确定了五种豆类饮食模式，其中四种模式包括罐头豆和干豆，而一种模式没有豆类消费。豆类消费被定义为食用菜豆的人，黑豆,鹰嘴豆,和/或平托豆。
结果：食用豆类饮食模式1、2、3和4的成年人的饮食质量评分（根据美国农业部2015年健康饮食指数评估）明显高于无豆模式（61.2±0.5、58.9±0.5、55.2±0.4和56.5±0.8vs48.8±0.2p's<0.0001）。豆类消费者对几种营养素的摄入量也明显较高(胆碱，α-亚麻酸,叶酸,铁,镁和维生素E）相对于非豆类消费者。同样，膳食纤维的摄入量，钾和钙，与无豆相比，豆类模式中所有公共卫生关注的营养素均显着较高。豆类饮食模式1（约占豆类每日总千卡的13.5％或约2份/天）和2（约占豆类每日总千卡的9.5％或约1.7份/天）与较低的BMI，相对于无豆，体重减轻，腰围改善。
结论：富含罐装和干豆的饮食模式与更高的饮食质量评分和更多的营养摄入相关，包括公共卫生关注的营养素。豆类饮食模式也与体重相关结果的改善有关。饮食指导应考虑与促进美国饮食模式中罐装和干豆消费增加相关的营养和健康益处。
