关键词: Dissociation assessment compartmentalization confirmatory factor analysis detachment

Mesh : Humans Female Psychometrics Italy Male Adult Reproducibility of Results Dissociative Disorders / psychology Self Report Middle Aged Psychiatric Status Rating Scales Adolescent Surveys and Questionnaires

来  源:   DOI:10.1080/15299732.2024.2323982

Abstract:
The Detachment and Compartmentalization Inventory (DCI) is a valid and reliable self-report instrument that assesses these two distinct forms of dissociative symptoms. However, there is limited research on the cross-cultural validation of the DCI. Therefore, this study aimed to develop an Italian translation of the DCI and examine its internal structure and psychometric properties (including internal consistency, convergent validity, and test-retest reliability) within an Italian-speaking community sample. The sample consisted of 1276 adults (887 females; mean age: 29.57 ± 10.96 years), who completed the DCI and other self-report measures evaluating dissociative experiences and childhood trauma. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the original two-factor model (χ2169 = 1312.80, RMSEA = 0.073, 95%CI 0.069-0.077; CFI = 0.94; TLI = 0.94; SRMR = 0.04). Additionally, the DCI exhibited good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity with another measure of dissociation. The study also confirmed the association between DCI scores and the severity of childhood trauma. Finally, a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated that the DCI effectively distinguishes individuals who screened positively for dissociative disorders. Overall, these findings indicate that the Italian translation of the DCI possesses satisfactory psychometric properties, suggesting its utility as a screening tool for assessing detachment and compartmentalization experiences.
摘要:
分离和分隔清单(DCI)是一种有效且可靠的自我报告工具,可评估这两种不同形式的分离症状。然而,关于DCI的跨文化验证的研究有限。因此,这项研究旨在开发DCI的意大利语翻译,并检查其内部结构和心理测量特性(包括内部一致性,收敛有效性,和重测可靠性)在讲意大利语的社区样本中。样本包括1276名成年人(887名女性;平均年龄:29.57±10.96岁),他完成了DCI和其他自我报告措施,评估了分离经历和童年创伤。验证性因素分析支持原始的双因素模型(χ2169=1312.80,RMSEA=0.073,95CI0.069-0.077;CFI=0.94;TLI=0.94;SRMR=0.04)。此外,DCI表现出良好的内部一致性,测试-重测可靠性,以及与另一种分离度量的收敛有效性。该研究还证实了DCI评分与儿童创伤严重程度之间的关联。最后,接受者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析表明,DCI有效地区分对解离性病症进行阳性筛查的个体。总的来说,这些发现表明,DCI的意大利语翻译具有令人满意的心理测量特性,建议将其用作评估脱离和划分经验的筛选工具。
公众号