PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: The aim was to evaluate the difference in the heat generated between zirconia (Zr) and steel (SS) drills, during implant site preparation.
UNASSIGNED: This systematic review followed the PRISMA methodology criteria and used the JBI Critical Assessment Guidelines for Quasi-Experimental Studies for quality assessment. The electronic search was conducted by using the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to January 2023. The formulated population, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) question was \"Do zirconia drills generate less heat than steel drills during implant site preparation?\". The meta-analysis was based on an inverse variance (IV) method.
UNASSIGNED: This review included 10 studies in vitro that used zirconia drills compared to steel drills with or without coatings. The meta-analysis indicated a significant difference between Zr drills and SS drills, with a lower bone temperature variation with Zr drills.
UNASSIGNED: Despite the limitations of this review, it was concluded that Zr drills had significantly less temperature variation than SS drills.
UNASSIGNED: This systematic review followed the PRISMA methodology criteria and used the JBI Critical Assessment Guidelines for Quasi-Experimental Studies for quality assessment. The electronic search was conducted by using the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to January 2023. The formulated population, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) question was \"Do zirconia drills generate less heat than steel drills during implant site preparation?\". The meta-analysis was based on an inverse variance (IV) method.
UNASSIGNED: This review included 10 studies in vitro that used zirconia drills compared to steel drills with or without coatings. The meta-analysis indicated a significant difference between Zr drills and SS drills, with a lower bone temperature variation with Zr drills.
UNASSIGNED: Despite the limitations of this review, it was concluded that Zr drills had significantly less temperature variation than SS drills.
摘要：
■目的是评估氧化锆（Zr）和钢（SS）钻头之间产生的热量的差异，在植入部位准备期间。
■本系统评价遵循PRISMA方法标准，并使用JBI准实验研究关键评估指南进行质量评估。电子搜索是通过使用PubMed/MEDLINE进行的，Embase,和Cochrane图书馆数据库到2023年1月。制定的人口，干预，比较,结果（PICO）的问题是：“氧化锆钻头在植入部位准备过程中产生的热量是否比钢钻头少？”荟萃分析基于逆方差(IV)方法。
■这篇综述包括10项体外研究，这些研究使用氧化锆钻头与带有或不带有涂层的钢钻头相比。荟萃分析表明Zr钻头和SS钻头之间存在显着差异，具有较低的骨温变化与Zr钻。
■尽管本评论有局限性，结论Zr钻头的温度变化明显小于SS钻头。
■本系统评价遵循PRISMA方法标准，并使用JBI准实验研究关键评估指南进行质量评估。电子搜索是通过使用PubMed/MEDLINE进行的，Embase,和Cochrane图书馆数据库到2023年1月。制定的人口，干预，比较,结果（PICO）的问题是：“氧化锆钻头在植入部位准备过程中产生的热量是否比钢钻头少？”荟萃分析基于逆方差(IV)方法。
■这篇综述包括10项体外研究，这些研究使用氧化锆钻头与带有或不带有涂层的钢钻头相比。荟萃分析表明Zr钻头和SS钻头之间存在显着差异，具有较低的骨温变化与Zr钻。
■尽管本评论有局限性，结论Zr钻头的温度变化明显小于SS钻头。
