This review uses the methodological framework for conducting a scoping review by Arksey and O\'Malley, with further guidance by Levac et al, and the Joanna Briggs Institute. It also refers to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols reporting guidelines. The following bibliographic databases will be searched: Embase, Medline, PsychINFO, Cinahl, AMED, and ASSIA, plus Web of Science, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, Scopus, and Google Scholar for grey literature. Reference lists of included papers will be studied. Two reviewers will independently screen title abstracts, and then full text of studies against inclusion criteria. Remaining studies will be quality assessed using appropriate critical appraisal tools. Findings will be charted and mapped to gain in-depth knowledge of the use of the internet in people with ME/CFS.
The findings from this review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and a report for leading charities of ME/CFS. The review will collect secondary data only and therefore does not need ethical approval.
方法:本评论使用方法学框架进行Arksey和O\'Malley的范围审查,在Levac等人的进一步指导下,还有JoannaBriggs研究所.它还指系统审查和荟萃分析方案报告指南的首选报告项目。将搜索以下书目数据库:Embase,Medline,心理信息,Cinahl,AMED,ASSIA,加上WebofScience,ProQuest论文和论文全球,Scopus,和谷歌灰色文学学者。将研究所包含论文的参考列表。两名审稿人将独立筛选标题摘要,然后是针对纳入标准的研究全文。剩余研究将使用适当的关键评估工具进行质量评估。将对调查结果进行图表和映射,以深入了解ME/CFS人群使用互联网的情况。
背景:本次审查的结果将通过同行评审的出版物和ME/CFS领先慈善机构的报告进行传播。审查将仅收集次要数据,因此不需要道德批准。