METHODS: Ten consecutive DTC patients with iodine avid bone metastasis at post-therapy WBS referred to 18F-NaF PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT were studied. The findings of the three imaging procedures were compared for abnormal detection rates and concordance.
RESULTS: At post-therapy 131I WBS, all patients had skeletal involvement with a total of 21 bone iodine avid lesions. At 18F-FDG PET/TC, 19 bone lesions demonstrated increased tracer uptake and CT pathological alterations, while 2 lesions did not show any pathological finding. At 18F-NaF PET/CT, the 19 bone lesions detected at 18F-FDG PET/TC also demonstrated abnormal tracer uptake, and the other 2 bone iodine avid foci did not show any pathological finding.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with DTC, 18F-NaF PET/CT did not obtain more information on the metastatic skeletal involvement than post-therapy 131I WBS and 18F-FDG PET/CT.
方法:研究了10例连续接受18F-NaFPET/CT和18F-FDGPET/CT的WBS治疗后出现碘性骨转移的DTC患者。比较了三种成像程序的异常检出率和一致性。
结果:治疗后131IWBS,所有患者均有骨骼受累,共发生21例骨碘狂热病变.在18F-FDGPET/TC,19个骨病变显示示踪剂摄取增加和CT病理改变,而2个病灶未显示任何病理发现。在18F-NaFPET/CT,在18F-FDGPET/TC检测到的19个骨病变也显示出异常的示踪剂摄取,另外2个骨碘狂热病灶未显示任何病理发现。
结论:在DTC患者中,与治疗后131IWBS和18F-FDGPET/CT相比,18F-NaFPET/CT并未获得更多有关转移性骨骼受累的信息。