Abstract：
BACKGROUND: The dialect spoken by children influences diagnostic decision-making regarding the identification and severity of speech sound disorder (SSD).
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to review papers that examined the influence of dialect on the identification of SSD in Vietnamese-speaking children.
METHODS: Five studies of mono- and multilingual Vietnamese-speaking children living in Vietnam and Australia were reviewed to examine the influence of dialect on the assessment and analysis children\'s speech. The main Vietnamese dialects (Standard, Northern, Central, Southern) differ in the production of consonants, vowels and tones.
RESULTS: Most speech assessments define correct production using the standard dialect of a language. Insights from recent studies of Vietnamese provide recommendations for also considering dialect in diagnostic decision-making. First, we recommend adding column(s) to the assessment score sheet that includes the dialectal variants spoken by adults in the child\'s family or community. Second, we calculate the accuracy of production twice, based on the standard form and dialectal form. Third, we report the percentage of consonants correct-standard (PCC-S) and percentage of consonants correct-dialect (PCC-D).
CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic decision-making is influenced by dialectal variation in children\'s speech, so speech and language therapists need to compare standard and dialectal productions when undertaking assessments, analysis and diagnostic decision-making.
CONCLUSIONS: What is already known on the subject Most speech assessments use the standard form of a dialect as the correct production. The standard dialect is used for diagnosis of SSD and identification of intervention targets. What this paper adds to the existing knowledge This paper examines five research studies of Vietnamese to identify ways to consider dialect in speech and language therapy assessment and analysis. Vietnamese provides a complex environment for this examination since there are numerous Vietnamese dialects and they differ according to consonants, vowels and tones. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Speech and language therapists are encouraged to add column(s) to their assessment score sheet that includes the dialectal variants spoken by adults and to report the PCC-S and PCC-D.
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to review papers that examined the influence of dialect on the identification of SSD in Vietnamese-speaking children.
METHODS: Five studies of mono- and multilingual Vietnamese-speaking children living in Vietnam and Australia were reviewed to examine the influence of dialect on the assessment and analysis children\'s speech. The main Vietnamese dialects (Standard, Northern, Central, Southern) differ in the production of consonants, vowels and tones.
RESULTS: Most speech assessments define correct production using the standard dialect of a language. Insights from recent studies of Vietnamese provide recommendations for also considering dialect in diagnostic decision-making. First, we recommend adding column(s) to the assessment score sheet that includes the dialectal variants spoken by adults in the child\'s family or community. Second, we calculate the accuracy of production twice, based on the standard form and dialectal form. Third, we report the percentage of consonants correct-standard (PCC-S) and percentage of consonants correct-dialect (PCC-D).
CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic decision-making is influenced by dialectal variation in children\'s speech, so speech and language therapists need to compare standard and dialectal productions when undertaking assessments, analysis and diagnostic decision-making.
CONCLUSIONS: What is already known on the subject Most speech assessments use the standard form of a dialect as the correct production. The standard dialect is used for diagnosis of SSD and identification of intervention targets. What this paper adds to the existing knowledge This paper examines five research studies of Vietnamese to identify ways to consider dialect in speech and language therapy assessment and analysis. Vietnamese provides a complex environment for this examination since there are numerous Vietnamese dialects and they differ according to consonants, vowels and tones. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Speech and language therapists are encouraged to add column(s) to their assessment score sheet that includes the dialectal variants spoken by adults and to report the PCC-S and PCC-D.
摘要：
背景：儿童所说的方言会影响有关语音障碍（SSD）的识别和严重程度的诊断决策。
目的：主要目的是审查研究方言对越南语儿童SSD识别影响的论文。
方法：对居住在越南和澳大利亚的会讲越南语的单语和多语种儿童的五项研究进行了综述，以研究方言对儿童言语评估和分析的影响。越南主要方言(标准，北方,中央,南方)在辅音的产生上有所不同，元音和音调。
结果：大多数语音评估使用语言的标准方言来定义正确的作品。来自越南语的最新研究的见解为在诊断决策中也考虑方言提供了建议。首先,我们建议在评估评分表中添加列，其中包括儿童家庭或社区中成人所说的方言变体。第二,我们计算了两次生产的准确性，基于标准形式和方言形式。第三，我们报告辅音正确标准（PCC-S）的百分比和辅音正确方言（PCC-D）的百分比。
结论：诊断决策受儿童言语方言变异的影响，因此，言语和语言治疗师在进行评估时需要比较标准和方言的制作，分析和诊断决策。
结论：关于该主题的已知内容大多数语音评估使用方言的标准形式作为正确的作品。标准方言用于SSD的诊断和干预目标的识别。本文对现有知识的补充本文研究了越南语的五项研究，以确定在语音和语言治疗评估和分析中考虑方言的方法。越南语为这次考试提供了一个复杂的环境，因为有许多越南方言，它们根据辅音而有所不同，元音和音调。这项工作的潜在或实际临床意义是什么？鼓励言语和语言治疗师在他们的评估评分表中添加列，包括成年人所说的方言变体，并报告PCC-S和PCC-D。
目的：主要目的是审查研究方言对越南语儿童SSD识别影响的论文。
方法：对居住在越南和澳大利亚的会讲越南语的单语和多语种儿童的五项研究进行了综述，以研究方言对儿童言语评估和分析的影响。越南主要方言(标准，北方,中央,南方)在辅音的产生上有所不同，元音和音调。
结果：大多数语音评估使用语言的标准方言来定义正确的作品。来自越南语的最新研究的见解为在诊断决策中也考虑方言提供了建议。首先,我们建议在评估评分表中添加列，其中包括儿童家庭或社区中成人所说的方言变体。第二,我们计算了两次生产的准确性，基于标准形式和方言形式。第三，我们报告辅音正确标准（PCC-S）的百分比和辅音正确方言（PCC-D）的百分比。
结论：诊断决策受儿童言语方言变异的影响，因此，言语和语言治疗师在进行评估时需要比较标准和方言的制作，分析和诊断决策。
结论：关于该主题的已知内容大多数语音评估使用方言的标准形式作为正确的作品。标准方言用于SSD的诊断和干预目标的识别。本文对现有知识的补充本文研究了越南语的五项研究，以确定在语音和语言治疗评估和分析中考虑方言的方法。越南语为这次考试提供了一个复杂的环境，因为有许多越南方言，它们根据辅音而有所不同，元音和音调。这项工作的潜在或实际临床意义是什么？鼓励言语和语言治疗师在他们的评估评分表中添加列，包括成年人所说的方言变体，并报告PCC-S和PCC-D。
