PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
There is great variability in the ways in which the speech intelligibility of d/Deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) children who use spoken language as part, or all, of their communication system is measured. This systematic review examined the measures and methods that have been used when examining the speech intelligibility of children who are DHH and the characteristics of these measures and methods. A systematic database search was conducted of CENTRAL; CINAHL; Cochrane; ERIC; Joanna Briggs; Linguistics, Language and Behavior Abstracts; Medline; Scopus; and Web of Science databases, as well as supplemental searches. A total of 204 included studies reported the use of many different measures/methods which measured segmental aspects of speech, with the most common being Allen et al.\'s (2001, The reliability of a rating scale for measuring speech intelligibility following pediatric cochlear implantation. Otology and Neurotology, 22(5), 631-633. https://doi.org/10.1097/00129492-200109000-00012) Speech Intelligibility Rating scale. Many studies included insufficient details to determine the measure that was used. Future research should utilize methods/measures with known psychometric validity, provide clear descriptions of the methods/measures used, and consider using more than one measure to account for limitations inherent in different methods of measuring the speech intelligibility of children who are DHH, and consider and discuss the rationale for the measure/method chosen.
摘要：
使用口语的d/聋哑和听力困难（DHH）儿童的语音清晰度存在很大差异，或全部，测量他们的通信系统。本系统综述研究了在检查DHH儿童的语音清晰度时使用的措施和方法以及这些措施和方法的特征。对CENTRAL；CINAHL；Cochrane；ERIC；JoannaBriggs；语言学，语言和行为文摘；Medline；Scopus；和WebofScience数据库，以及补充搜索。总共有204项研究报告了使用许多不同的措施/方法来测量语音的分段方面，最常见的是艾伦等人。（2001年，用于测量小儿人工耳蜗植入后语音清晰度的评定量表的可靠性。耳科学和中空学,22(5)、631-633.https://doi.org/10.1097/00129492-200109000-00012)语音清晰度等级量表。许多研究包括的细节不足以确定所使用的措施。未来的研究应该利用已知心理测量效度的方法/措施，提供所使用的方法/措施的明确描述，并考虑使用一种以上的措施来解释测量DHH儿童语音清晰度的不同方法固有的局限性，并考虑和讨论所选择的措施/方法的基本原理。
