Abstract：
BACKGROUND: Penile prothesis (PP) is a recommended treatment for erectile dysfunction that is refractory to less invasive treatments, but there are few validated tools to assess patient satisfaction.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess patient satisfaction after PP implantation using the French Satisfaction Survey for Inflatable Penile Implant (SSIPI) questionnaire.
METHODS: Demographic, clinical, and perioperative data were collected from all consecutive patients who underwent PP implantation in our center between 2016 and 2021. The French SSIPI questionnaire was completed during a telephone call with each patient by an independent investigator.
RESULTS: A good functional result was considered when the total SSIPI score was >48, corresponding to a score of >3 for each item.
RESULTS: The median global SSIPI score for the cohort was 66 (interquartile range [IQR], 60-73), and 53 (89.8%) patients were satisfied. The appearance of the penis with the PP was the item that had the lowest score for satisfaction (median score 23 [IQR, 19-26]), while the patients reported almost no pain (median score 10 [IQR, 9-10]). When patients with a total score of ≤64 were compared with those with a score of >64, PP size was significantly greater in the group with better functional results (P = .03).
CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of patient satisfaction with a PP is important because this is the main criterion used to judge the success of surgery.
UNASSIGNED: To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the satisfaction of patients with a PP using the French-validated version of SSIPI questionnaire. However, patients came from a single center and the population size was small.
CONCLUSIONS: Almost 90% of patients with a PP were satisfied with the device when satisfaction was assessed using the SSIPI questionnaire.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess patient satisfaction after PP implantation using the French Satisfaction Survey for Inflatable Penile Implant (SSIPI) questionnaire.
METHODS: Demographic, clinical, and perioperative data were collected from all consecutive patients who underwent PP implantation in our center between 2016 and 2021. The French SSIPI questionnaire was completed during a telephone call with each patient by an independent investigator.
RESULTS: A good functional result was considered when the total SSIPI score was >48, corresponding to a score of >3 for each item.
RESULTS: The median global SSIPI score for the cohort was 66 (interquartile range [IQR], 60-73), and 53 (89.8%) patients were satisfied. The appearance of the penis with the PP was the item that had the lowest score for satisfaction (median score 23 [IQR, 19-26]), while the patients reported almost no pain (median score 10 [IQR, 9-10]). When patients with a total score of ≤64 were compared with those with a score of >64, PP size was significantly greater in the group with better functional results (P = .03).
CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of patient satisfaction with a PP is important because this is the main criterion used to judge the success of surgery.
UNASSIGNED: To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the satisfaction of patients with a PP using the French-validated version of SSIPI questionnaire. However, patients came from a single center and the population size was small.
CONCLUSIONS: Almost 90% of patients with a PP were satisfied with the device when satisfaction was assessed using the SSIPI questionnaire.
摘要：
背景：阴茎假体（PP）是勃起功能障碍的推荐治疗方法，对侵入性较小的治疗方法难以治疗，但很少有经过验证的工具来评估患者满意度。
目的：本研究的目的是使用法国充气阴茎植入物满意度调查（SSIPI）问卷评估PP植入后患者的满意度。
方法：人口统计学，临床,我们收集了2016年至2021年间在我们中心接受PP植入的所有连续患者的围手术期数据.法国SSIPI问卷在与每位患者的电话通话期间由独立研究者完成。
结果：当SSIPI总得分>48时，认为功能良好，对应于每个项目的得分>3。
结果：该队列的整体SSIPI得分中位数为66（四分位数范围[IQR]，60-73），53例(89.8%)患者满意。带有PP的阴茎外观是满意度得分最低的项目（中位数得分23[IQR，19-26]),而患者报告几乎没有疼痛(中位数评分10[IQR，9-10]).当总分≤64的患者与评分>64的患者相比时，功能效果更好的组的PP大小明显更大（P=0.03）。
结论：评估患者对PP的满意度很重要，因为这是判断手术成功的主要标准。
■据我们所知，这是第一项使用法国验证版本的SSIPI问卷评估PP患者满意度的研究.然而,患者来自一个中心，人口规模很小。
结论：当使用SSIPI问卷评估满意度时，几乎90%的PP患者对器械满意。
目的：本研究的目的是使用法国充气阴茎植入物满意度调查（SSIPI）问卷评估PP植入后患者的满意度。
方法：人口统计学，临床,我们收集了2016年至2021年间在我们中心接受PP植入的所有连续患者的围手术期数据.法国SSIPI问卷在与每位患者的电话通话期间由独立研究者完成。
结果：当SSIPI总得分>48时，认为功能良好，对应于每个项目的得分>3。
结果：该队列的整体SSIPI得分中位数为66（四分位数范围[IQR]，60-73），53例(89.8%)患者满意。带有PP的阴茎外观是满意度得分最低的项目（中位数得分23[IQR，19-26]),而患者报告几乎没有疼痛(中位数评分10[IQR，9-10]).当总分≤64的患者与评分>64的患者相比时，功能效果更好的组的PP大小明显更大（P=0.03）。
结论：评估患者对PP的满意度很重要，因为这是判断手术成功的主要标准。
■据我们所知，这是第一项使用法国验证版本的SSIPI问卷评估PP患者满意度的研究.然而,患者来自一个中心，人口规模很小。
结论：当使用SSIPI问卷评估满意度时，几乎90%的PP患者对器械满意。
