关键词: conceptions implementation person‐centred care

Mesh : Patient-Centered Care Humans Focus Groups

来  源:   DOI:10.1111/hex.13887   PDF(Pubmed)

Abstract:
Although the implementation of person-centred care (PCC) has gained momentum in healthcare systems, it is not always obvious why it is an important objective in clinical settings and educational institutions that train future healthcare professionals. Various conceptions about PCC have flourished, such as that it only works in certain healthcare contexts, it is the same as the patient making all their own healthcare decisions, it is too demanding for most patients, the word \'patient\' may no longer be used, the care provided is already person-centred, and that there is simply not enough time and resources to achieve it. This viewpoint paper aims to problematize these conceptions and may be used for didactical and reflective exercises that support the transition towards more person-centred healthcare. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The Person Council for patients and carers at the University of Gothenburg provided focus group input on and validated the occurrence of the conceptions discussed in the present paper. The person council consists of a group of persons with many years of personal experiences of health care, either as patients and/or relatives/carers. One member of the person council who is also a designer and artist created the illustration for the article.
摘要:
尽管以人为中心的护理(PCC)的实施在医疗保健系统中获得了势头,这并不总是显而易见的,为什么它是一个重要的目标,在临床环境和教育机构,培养未来的医疗保健专业人员。关于PCC的各种概念蓬勃发展,比如它只在某些医疗保健环境下有效,就像病人自己做医疗决定一样,对大多数病人来说要求太高了,“病人”一词可能不再使用,提供的护理已经以人为本,而且根本没有足够的时间和资源来实现它。这篇观点论文旨在对这些概念进行质疑,并可用于教学和反思练习,以支持向以人为本的医疗保健过渡。患者或公众贡献:哥德堡大学的患者和护理人员理事会提供了焦点小组的意见,并验证了本文讨论的概念的发生。人事局由一批具有多年个人保健经验的人士组成,作为患者和/或亲属/照顾者。人事局的一名成员也是设计师和艺术家,为这篇文章创作了插图。
公众号