METHODS: Nineteen patients who underwent surgery for scaphoid non-union between 2017 and 2021 at a single institution were recruited retrospectively in this study. All patients were operated by a one senior orthopaedic surgeon. A mailed questionnaire with the modified mayo wrist (MMW) and the patient rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) scores were sent to the patients.
RESULTS: All patients were males with a mean age of 22.5 years. There was no statistically significant difference in the PRWE score between the two PVBGs. However, a statistically significant difference was found in the MMW score, with the 1,2-ICSRA PVBG having better scores.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the 2,3-ICSRA having a longer arc of rotation, longer nutrient arteries, and is technically easier to incorporate in a PVBG, when compared with the 1,2-ICSRA it did not result in better patient-rated outcome scores.
方法:本研究回顾性招募了在2017年至2021年期间在单个机构接受舟骨不愈合手术的19例患者。所有患者均由一名高级骨科医师进行手术。将带有改良的Mayo腕部(MMW)和患者评估腕部评估(PRWE)评分的邮寄问卷发送给患者。
结果:所有患者均为男性,平均年龄为22.5岁。两种PVBG之间的PRWE评分没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,MMW评分有统计学上的显著差异,1,2-ICSRAPVBG评分较好。
结论:尽管2,3-ICSRA具有较长的旋转弧,更长的营养动脉,在技术上更容易并入PVBG中,与1,2-ICSRA相比,它没有导致更好的患者评估结局评分.