PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
A major gap in the biodiversity knowledge graph is a connection between taxonomic names and the taxonomic literature. While both names and publications often have persistent identifiers (PIDs), such as Life Science Identifiers (LSIDs) or Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs), LSIDs for names are rarely linked to DOIs for publications. This article describes efforts to make those connections across three large taxonomic databases: Index Fungorum, International Plant Names Index (IPNI) and the Index of Organism Names (ION). Over a million names have been matched to DOIs or other persistent identifiers for taxonomic publications. This represents approximately 36% of names for which publication data are available. The mappings between LSIDs and publication PIDs are made available through ChecklistBank. Applications of this mapping are discussed, including a web app to locate the citation of a taxonomic name and a knowledge graph that uses data on researcher ORCID ids to connect taxonomic names and publications to authors of those names.
摘要：
生物多样性知识图中的主要差距是分类名称与分类文献之间的联系。虽然名称和出版物通常都具有持久性标识符(PID)，例如生命科学标识符(LSID)或数字对象标识符(DOI)，名称的LSID很少链接到发布的DOI。本文介绍了在三个大型分类数据库之间建立这些连接的努力：IndexFungorum，国际植物名称索引(IPNI)和生物名称索引(ION)。超过一百万个名称已与DOI或其他分类出版物的持久性标识符匹配。这大约占可获得出版物数据的名称的36％。LSID和发布PID之间的映射可通过ChecklistBank使用。讨论了这种映射的应用，包括一个Web应用程序来查找一个分类名称的引用和一个知识图，该知识图使用研究人员ORCIDID上的数据将分类名称和出版物连接到这些名称的作者。
