PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
Kernberg originally proposed the psychoanalytic concept of personality organization (PO), which measures personality pathology from a dimensional approach with multiple scales and can be evaluated using the Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO) from six domains: identity, object relations, primitive defenses, coping vs. rigidity, aggression, and moral values. The present study translated the original version into the Chinese STIPO (STIPO-CH) version and evaluated its reliability and validity.
The STIPO-CH was administered to 49 non-clinical subjects. They also completed the Chinese version of the Inventory of Personality Organization and the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory to evaluate criterion-related reliability. Interrater reliability was assessed with intraclass correlations. An item analysis was carried out to explore the structure and internal consistency.
Interrater reliability (intraclass correlations) ranged from 0.98 to 0.99. Results suggested acceptable internal consistency for identity and moral values. The correlations between STIPO-CH domains and self-report questionnaires indicated that construct validity and criterion-related validity were acceptable to good.
Overall, this study presents preliminary psychometric properties of STIPO-CH. Limitations regarding the sample, interviewers, and cultural differences are discussed. Future research is highly recommended.
The STIPO-CH was administered to 49 non-clinical subjects. They also completed the Chinese version of the Inventory of Personality Organization and the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory to evaluate criterion-related reliability. Interrater reliability was assessed with intraclass correlations. An item analysis was carried out to explore the structure and internal consistency.
Interrater reliability (intraclass correlations) ranged from 0.98 to 0.99. Results suggested acceptable internal consistency for identity and moral values. The correlations between STIPO-CH domains and self-report questionnaires indicated that construct validity and criterion-related validity were acceptable to good.
Overall, this study presents preliminary psychometric properties of STIPO-CH. Limitations regarding the sample, interviewers, and cultural differences are discussed. Future research is highly recommended.
摘要：
背景：Kernberg最初提出了人格组织（PO）的精神分析概念，它从多个尺度的维度方法测量人格病理学，并且可以使用人格组织结构化访谈（STIPO）从六个领域进行评估：身份，对象关系,原始防御,应对与刚性,侵略,和道德价值观。本研究将原始版本翻译为中文STIPO（STIPO-CH）版本，并评估了其信度和效度。
方法：对49名非临床受试者给予STIPO-CH。他们还完成了中文版的人格组织量表和Millon临床多轴量表，以评估与标准相关的可靠性。采用组内相关性评估了评分者间的可靠性。进行了项目分析，以探索结构和内部一致性。
结果：评分者间可靠性（组内相关性）范围为0.98至0.99。结果表明，身份和道德价值观具有可接受的内部一致性。STIPO-CH域与自我报告问卷之间的相关性表明，结构效度和与标准相关的效度可以接受。
结论：总体而言，这项研究提出了STIPO-CH的初步心理测量学特性。关于样品的限制，面试官,并讨论了文化差异。强烈推荐未来的研究。
方法：对49名非临床受试者给予STIPO-CH。他们还完成了中文版的人格组织量表和Millon临床多轴量表，以评估与标准相关的可靠性。采用组内相关性评估了评分者间的可靠性。进行了项目分析，以探索结构和内部一致性。
结果：评分者间可靠性（组内相关性）范围为0.98至0.99。结果表明，身份和道德价值观具有可接受的内部一致性。STIPO-CH域与自我报告问卷之间的相关性表明，结构效度和与标准相关的效度可以接受。
结论：总体而言，这项研究提出了STIPO-CH的初步心理测量学特性。关于样品的限制，面试官,并讨论了文化差异。强烈推荐未来的研究。
