METHODS: We implemented a mixed-methods study between August to December 2019. Phase I used a qualitative approach, with in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. Phase II used a quantitative approach with a close-ended questionnaire based on Phase I findings. A conditional inference tree (CIT) model first identified geographic and socio-demographic determinants, which were then tested using a logistic regression model.
RESULTS: Fever corresponded to a high diversity of conceptions, symptoms and believed causes. Self-medication was the commonest behaviour at fever onset. If fever persisted, migrants primarily sought care in humanitarian cost-free clinics (45.5%, 92/202), followed by private clinics (43.1%, 87/202), health posts (36.1%, 73/202), public hospitals (33.7%, 68/202) and primary care units (30, 14.9%). The qualitative analysis identified distance and legal status as key barriers for accessing health care. The quantitative analysis further investigated determinants influencing health-seeking behaviour: living near a town where a cost-free clinic operated was inversely associated with seeking care at health posts (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.40, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] [0.19-0.86]), and public hospital attendance (aOR 0.31, 95% CI [0.14-0.67]). Living further away from the nearest town was associated with health posts attendance (aOR 1.05, 95% CI [1.00-1.10] per 1 km). Having legal status was inversely associated with cost-free clinics attendance (aOR 0.27, 95% CI [0.10-0.71]), and positively associated with private clinic and public hospital attendance (aOR 2.56, 95% CI [1.00-6.54] and 5.15, 95% CI [1.80-14.71], respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Fever conception and believed causes are context-specific and should be investigated prior to any intervention. Distance to care and legal status were key determinants influencing health-seeking behaviour. Current economic upheavals are accelerating the unregulated flow of undocumented migrants from Myanmar to Thailand, warranting further inclusiveness and investments in the public health system.
方法:我们在2019年8月至12月之间实施了一项混合方法研究。第一阶段采用了定性的方法,深入访谈和焦点小组讨论。第二阶段使用定量方法,并根据第一阶段的调查结果进行封闭式问卷调查。条件推理树(CIT)模型首先确定地理和社会人口统计学决定因素,然后使用逻辑回归模型进行测试。
结果:发烧与概念的高度多样性相对应,症状和相信的原因。自我药物治疗是发烧时最常见的行为。如果发烧持续,移民主要在人道主义免费诊所寻求护理(45.5%,92/202),其次是私人诊所(43.1%,87/202),卫生站(36.1%,73/202),公立医院(33.7%,68/202)和初级保健单位(30,14.9%)。定性分析确定了距离和法律地位是获得医疗保健的主要障碍。定量分析进一步调查了影响健康寻求行为的决定因素:居住在一个免费诊所经营的城镇附近与在卫生站寻求护理成反比(调整后的优势比[aOR],0.40,95%置信区间[95%CI][0.19-0.86]),和公立医院出勤率(aOR0.31,95%CI[0.14-0.67])。住在离最近城镇更远的地方与卫生站的出勤率有关(每1公里aOR1.05,95%CI[1.00-1.10])。具有法律地位与免费诊所出勤率成反比(aOR0.27,95%CI[0.10-0.71]),与私人诊所和公立医院就诊呈正相关(aOR2.56,95%CI[1.00-6.54]和5.15,95%CI[1.80-14.71],分别)。
结论:发热的概念和相信的原因是特定的背景,应在任何干预之前进行调查。与护理的距离和法律地位是影响寻求健康行为的关键决定因素。当前的经济动荡正在加速无证移民从缅甸到泰国的无管制流动,保证公共卫生系统的进一步包容性和投资。