Abstract：
Using the Fukushima accident experience, this letter discusses recent efforts on measuring scientific consensus views-that is, quantifying the agreement among scientists. In the field of radiological protection, the efforts to measure scientific consensus views deserve attention, because hoaxes have been spreading even after the Fukushima nuclear accident. We discussed two points. First, the visualization of the diversity of scientific opinions shatters the diversity illusion caused by the mass media\'s irresponsible dissemination of pro and con arguments. Second, the use of scientific consensus views without an ethical code is dangerous. Measuring scientific consensus views should be accompanied with the development of ethical guidelines on using it.
摘要：
利用福岛事故的经验，这封信讨论了最近在衡量科学共识观点方面的努力-也就是说，量化科学家之间的协议。在放射防护领域,衡量科学共识的努力值得关注，因为即使在福岛核事故之后，恶作剧也在蔓延。我们讨论了两点。首先,科学观点多样性的可视化打破了大众媒体不负责任地传播赞成和反对论点所造成的多样性错觉。第二,在没有道德准则的情况下使用科学共识观点是危险的。衡量科学共识的同时，还应制定使用科学共识的道德准则。
