PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
In this preliminary study, we compared daytime blood pressure (BP) measurements performed by a commercially available cuffless-and continual-BP monitor (Aktiia monitor, Neuchâtel, Switzerland) and a traditional ambulatory BP monitor (ABPM; Dyasis 3, Novacor, Paris, France) from 52 patients enrolled in a 12-week cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program (Neuchâtel, Switzerland). Daytime (9am-9pm) systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) BP from 7-day averaged data from Aktiia monitor were compared to 1-day averaged BP data from ABPM. No significant differences were found between the Aktiia monitor and the ABPM for SBP (μ ± σ [95% confidence interval]: 1.6 ± 10.5 [-1.5, 4.6] mmHg, P = 0.306; correlation [R2]: 0.70; ± 10/ ± 15 mmHg agreements: 60%, 84%). Marginally non-significant bias was found for DBP (-2.2 ± 8.0 [-4.5, 0.1] mmHg, P = 0.058; R2: 0.66; ±10/±15 mmHg agreements: 78%, 96%). These intermediate results show that daytime BP measurements using the Aktiia monitor generate data comparable to that of an ABPM monitor.
摘要：
在这项初步研究中，我们比较了市售的无袖口和连续BP监测仪（Aktiia监测仪，纳沙泰尔,瑞士)和传统的动态血压监测仪(ABPM；Dyasis3，Novacor，巴黎,法国）来自参加12周心脏康复（CR）计划的52名患者（纳沙泰尔，瑞士)。将来自Aktiia监测仪的7天平均数据的白天（上午9点至下午9点）收缩压（SBP）和舒张压（DBP）BP与来自ABPM的1天平均BP数据进行比较。Aktiia监测仪和ABPM的SBP之间没有发现显着差异（μ±σ[95％置信区间]：1.6±10.5[-1.5，4.6]mmHg，P=0.306；相关性[R2]：0.70；±10/±15mmHg协议：60％，84%）。DBP（-2.2±8.0[-4.5，0.1]mmHg，P=0.058；R2：0.66；±10/±15mmHg协议：78％，96%）。这些中间结果表明，使用Aktiia监测仪进行的白天BP测量可生成与ABPM监测仪相当的数据。
