METHODS: Both bracket systems were applied to 24 extracted human premolars, and bacterial adhesion with Streptoccocus sobrinus (S. sobrinus) was performed for 24 h, 48 h, 7 d, and 14 d. After incubation, bacterial colonization was examined in specific areas by electron microscopy.
RESULTS: Overall, significantly fewer bacterial colonies were found in the adhesive area around the APC flash-free brackets (n = 507 ± 13 bacteria) than the conventionally bonded bracket systems (n = 850 ± 56 bacteria). This is a significant difference (**p = 0.004). However, APC flash-free brackets tend to create marginal gaps with more bacterial adhesion in this area than conventional bracket systems (n = 265 ± 31 bacteria). This bacterial accumulation in the marginal-gap area is also significant (*p = 0.029).
CONCLUSIONS: A smooth adhesive surface with minimal adhesive excess is beneficial for reducing bacterial adhesion but also poses a risk of marginal gap formation with subsequent bacterial colonization, which can potentially trigger carious lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: To reduce bacterial adhesion, the APC flash-free bracket adhesive system with low adhesive excess might be beneficial. APC flash-free brackets reduce the bacterial colonization in the bracket environment. A lower number of bacteria can minimize white spot lesions in the bracket environment. APC flash-free brackets tend to form marginal gaps between the bracket adhesive and the tooth.
方法:两种支架系统均应用于24颗提取的人类前磨牙,
结果:总体而言,
结论:具有最小粘附量的光滑粘附表面有利于减少细菌粘附,但也存在形成边缘间隙和随后细菌定植的风险,
结论:为了减少细菌粘附,