关键词: Congenital heart disease ICD complications Implantable cardioverter defibrillator Paediatric age Subcutaneous-ICD

Mesh : Humans Child Young Adult Retrospective Studies Treatment Outcome Arrhythmias, Cardiac / diagnosis epidemiology therapy Defibrillators, Implantable / adverse effects Death, Sudden, Cardiac / epidemiology etiology prevention & control Registries Heart Defects, Congenital / complications diagnosis epidemiology

来  源:   DOI:10.1093/europace/euac162   PDF(Pubmed)

Abstract:
Subcutaneous-implantable cardiac defibrillators (S-ICDs) are used increasingly to prevent sudden cardiac death in young patients. This study was set up to gain insight in the indications for S-ICD, possible complications, and their predictors and follow-up results.
A multicentre, observational, retrospective, non-randomized, standard-of-care registry on S-ICD outcome in young patients with congenital heart diseases (CHDs), inherited arrhythmias (IAs), idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF), and cardiomyopathies (CMPs). Anthropometry was registered as well as implantation technique, mid-term device-related complications, and incidence of appropriate/inappropriate shocks (IASs). Data are reported as median (interquartile range) or mean ± standard deviation. Eighty-one patients (47% CMPs, 20% CHD, 21% IVF, and 12% IA), aged 15 (14-17) years, with body mass index (BMI) 21.8 ± 3.8 kg/m2, underwent S-ICD implantation (primary prevention in 59%). This was performed with two-incision technique in 81% and with a subcutaneous pocket in 59%. Shock and conditional zones were programmed at 250 (200-250) and 210 (180-240) b.p.m., respectively. No intraoperative complications occurred. Follow up was 19 (6-35) months: no defibrillation failure occurred, 17% of patients received appropriate shocks, 13% of patients received IAS (supraventricular tachycardias 40%, T-wave oversensing 40%, and non-cardiac oversensing 20%). Reprogramming, proper drug therapy, and surgical revision avoided further IAS. Complications requiring surgical revision occurred in 9% of patients, with higher risks in patients with three-incision procedures [hazard ratio (HR) 4.3, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.5-34, P = 0.038] and BMI < 20 (HR 5.1, 95% CI 1-24, P = 0.031).
This multicentre European paediatric registry showed good S-ICD efficacy and safety in young patients. Newer implantation techniques and BMI > 20 showed better outcome.
摘要:
目的:皮下植入心脏除颤器(S-ICD)越来越多地用于预防年轻患者的心源性猝死。这项研究是为了深入了解S-ICD的适应症,可能的并发症,以及它们的预测因素和后续结果。
结果:多中心,观察,回顾性,非随机化,关于年轻先天性心脏病(CHD)患者S-ICD结局的护理标准注册表,遗传性心律失常(IAs),特发性心室纤颤(IVF),和心肌病(CMP)。注册了人体测量学以及植入技术,中期器械相关并发症,以及适当/不适当电击(IAS)的发生率。数据报告为中值(四分位间距)或平均值±标准偏差。81名患者(47%的CMPs,20%CHD,21%IVF,和12%IA),15岁(14-17岁),体重指数(BMI)21.8±3.8kg/m2,接受了S-ICD植入(59%的一级预防)。81%的患者采用双切口技术,59%的患者采用皮下口袋。冲击和条件区编程为250(200-250)和210(180-240)b.p.m.,分别。术中无并发症发生。随访19(6~35)个月:无除颤失败,17%的患者接受了适当的电击,13%的患者接受了IAS(室上性心动过速40%,T波过感知40%,和非心脏过度感知20%)。重新编程,适当的药物治疗,和手术翻修避免了进一步的IAS。需要手术翻修的并发症发生在9%的患者中,三切口手术患者的风险较高[风险比(HR)4.3,95%置信区间(95%CI)0.5-34,P=0.038]和BMI<20(HR5.1,95%CI1-24,P=0.031)。
结论:这项多中心欧洲儿科注册在年轻患者中显示出良好的S-ICD疗效和安全性。较新的植入技术和BMI>20显示出更好的结果。
公众号