METHODS: An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted from February 19 to March 31, 2021. Structured self-administered questionnaires were used to collect data, which were comprised of knowledge and practice questions. Knowledge and practice among participants could be measured using the Chi-square (χ2) test of independence at p-values <0.05.
RESULTS: A total of 378 participants with a mean age of 34.2 ± 7.8 SD have participated, with a response rate of 92%. Of the total respondents, about 144 (41.1%) and 143 (40.9%) had good knowledge and practice, respectively. Generally, teachers who were trained in first aid had fewer scores (25.6%) than those who were not (43.1%). Teachers who had heard about epilepsy (44.2%) had a higher opportunity to have good knowledge than those who had not heard about epilepsy.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that there was a gap in the knowledge and practice of teachers regarding epileptic seizures.
方法:于2021年2月19日至3月31日进行了一项基于机构的横断面研究。结构化的自我管理问卷被用来收集数据,由知识和实践问题组成。参与者的知识和实践可以在p值<0.05时使用卡方(χ2)检验独立性来测量。
结果:共有378名平均年龄为34.2±7.8SD的参与者参加了,响应率为92%。在所有受访者中,约144(41.1%)和143(40.9%)具有良好的知识和实践,分别。一般来说,接受过急救培训的教师的分数(25.6%)低于未接受急救培训的教师(43.1%)。听说过癫痫的教师(44.2%)比没有听说过癫痫的教师有更高的机会获得良好的知识。
结论:这项研究表明,教师对癫痫发作的认识和实践存在差距。