Phenotypic and genotypic resistance of 13 CoNS isolates were investigated by antimicrobial susceptibility testing and PCR. Similarity of isolates was determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Characterisation of the cfr-carrying plasmid was performed by S1 nuclease PFGE, Southern blotting and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed for phylogenetic analysis. Growth curve analysis was performed with and without linezolid to determinate the possible contribution of linezolid dependence to linezolid-resistant CoNS dissemination.
Thirteen CoNS isolates showed linezolid MICs of 8 mg/L to >256 mg/L, typed into three PFGE profiles. Southern blotting and WGS indicated that the cfr gene was located on a 39.5-kb plasmid with 99% identity to cfr-harbouring plasmids pSR01, pLRSA417 and pH29-46. The cfr gene was flanked by two copies of an IS256-like element ISEnfa4 family transposase, indicating the transferability of linezolid resistance conferred by the cfr gene. Comparative phylogenetic analysis revealed that Staphylococcus capitis XZ03 shared high similarity with linezolid-resistant S. capitis isolates in Huashan Hospital, Shanghai. Thirteen CoNS isolates did not exhibit linezolid dependence on exposure from 8-32 mg/L.
The endemic CoNS clone carrying the cfr gene in our hospital showed high-level linezolid resistance, threatening linezolid use. Linezolid-dependent growth under linezolid selective pressure was not observed, indicating that it may not yet be a common phenotype in Staphylococcus spp.
通过药敏试验和PCR检测13株CoNS的表型和基因型耐药性。通过脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)确定分离株的相似性。携带cfr的质粒的表征通过S1核酸酶PFGE进行,Southern印迹和全基因组测序(WGS)。构建了最大似然系统发育树进行系统发育分析。在有和没有利奈唑胺的情况下进行生长曲线分析,以确定利奈唑胺依赖性对利奈唑胺抗性CoNS传播的可能贡献。
13株CoNS分离株显示利奈唑胺的MIC为8mg/L至>256mg/L,键入三个PFGE配置文件。Southern印迹和WGS表明,cfr基因位于39.5kb的质粒上,与携带cfr的质粒pSR01,pLRSA417和pH29-46具有99%的同一性。cfr基因的侧翼是两个IS256样元件ISEnfa4家族转座酶的拷贝,表明cfr基因赋予的利奈唑胺抗性的可转移性。比较系统发育分析显示,华山医院的头孢葡萄球菌XZ03与耐利奈唑胺的头孢葡萄球菌具有很高的相似性。上海。13种CoNS分离株对8-32mg/L的暴露没有利奈唑胺依赖性。
我院携带cfr基因的地方性CoNS克隆显示出高水平的利奈唑胺耐药性,威胁利奈唑胺的使用。未观察到利奈唑胺选择性压力下依赖利奈唑胺的生长,这表明它可能还不是葡萄球菌属的常见表型。