METHODS: We retrospectively identified stored clinical isolates of MAB and reviewed patient medical records to compare clinical characteristics, sites of infection, and outcomes among patients infected with M. abscessus subsp. abscessus (M. abscessus) and M. abscessus subsp. massiliense (M. massiliense). MAB subspecies were characterised by multilocus sequence analysis with 3-locus sequence (hsp65, rpoB, and secA1) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.
RESULTS: After outbreak and duplicated cases were excluded, 56 and 36 patients with infection caused by M. abscessus and M. massiliense, respectively, were included in the analysis. Patients with either cardiovascular disease or risk factors for cardiovascular disease (male gender and age ≥55 years) were 4.5 times more likely to harbour M. abscessus (P = 0.002), whereas M. massiliense was 4.8 times more frequently recovered from cutaneous and surgical wounds (P = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Distinct host and organ specificity were observed among patients infected with M. abscessus and those with M. massiliense. These differences may provide clinically significant clues to optimise treatment strategies.