Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: To identify, examine, and map literature on the experiences of single-room hospital accommodation, exploring what is known about how single-room accommodation in hospitals is viewed by patients and nurses.
UNASSIGNED: Worldwide, hospital design is changing to mainly single-room accommodation. However, there is little literature exploring patients\' and nurses\' experiences of single-room designs.
UNASSIGNED: Scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance on scoping reviews.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted the search in medical databases for scientific and gray literature. The four authors independently used a data extraction tool to include sources from the searches. The sources were discussed during the process, and in case of a disagreement between two reviewers, the third and fourth reviewer would be invited to participate in the discussion until consensus was achieved.
UNASSIGNED: We included 22 sources published during the period 2002-2020, with a majority (n = 16) during the period 2013-2020. The sources were distributed on 10 different countries; however, England dominated with 14 publications. We found three main maps for reporting on patients\' experiences: (1) personal control, (2) dignity, and (3) by myself. For the nurses\' experiences, we found four main maps: (1) the working environment, (2) changes of nursing practice, (3) privacy and dignity, and (4) patient safety.
UNASSIGNED: We suggested that patients\' and nurses\' experiences are predominantly interdependent and that the implications of single-room accommodation is a large and complex issue which goes beyond hospital design.
UNASSIGNED: Worldwide, hospital design is changing to mainly single-room accommodation. However, there is little literature exploring patients\' and nurses\' experiences of single-room designs.
UNASSIGNED: Scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance on scoping reviews.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted the search in medical databases for scientific and gray literature. The four authors independently used a data extraction tool to include sources from the searches. The sources were discussed during the process, and in case of a disagreement between two reviewers, the third and fourth reviewer would be invited to participate in the discussion until consensus was achieved.
UNASSIGNED: We included 22 sources published during the period 2002-2020, with a majority (n = 16) during the period 2013-2020. The sources were distributed on 10 different countries; however, England dominated with 14 publications. We found three main maps for reporting on patients\' experiences: (1) personal control, (2) dignity, and (3) by myself. For the nurses\' experiences, we found four main maps: (1) the working environment, (2) changes of nursing practice, (3) privacy and dignity, and (4) patient safety.
UNASSIGNED: We suggested that patients\' and nurses\' experiences are predominantly interdependent and that the implications of single-room accommodation is a large and complex issue which goes beyond hospital design.
摘要：
■要识别，检查，以及关于单间医院住宿经验的地图文献，探索病人和护士如何看待医院的单间住宿。
■全球，医院的设计正在转变为以单间住宿为主。然而,很少有文献探讨患者和护士的单室设计经验。
■遵循乔安娜·布里格斯研究所关于范围审查的指导进行范围审查。
■我们在医学数据库中搜索了科学和灰色文献。四位作者独立使用数据提取工具来包含搜索来源。在此过程中讨论了来源，如果两个审稿人有分歧，第三和第四审稿人将被邀请参加讨论，直到达成共识。
■我们包含了2002-2020年期间发布的22个来源，其中大多数（n=16）在2013-2020年期间。来源分布在10个不同的国家；然而，英格兰以14种出版物为主。我们发现了三个主要的地图报告病人的经验：（1）个人控制，（2）尊严，（3）我自己。对于护士的经验，我们发现了四个主要地图:(1)工作环境，(2)护理实践的变化,（3）隐私和尊严，（4）患者安全。
■我们建议病人和护士的经历主要是相互依存的，单间住宿的影响是一个庞大而复杂的问题，超出了医院的设计。
■全球，医院的设计正在转变为以单间住宿为主。然而,很少有文献探讨患者和护士的单室设计经验。
■遵循乔安娜·布里格斯研究所关于范围审查的指导进行范围审查。
■我们在医学数据库中搜索了科学和灰色文献。四位作者独立使用数据提取工具来包含搜索来源。在此过程中讨论了来源，如果两个审稿人有分歧，第三和第四审稿人将被邀请参加讨论，直到达成共识。
■我们包含了2002-2020年期间发布的22个来源，其中大多数（n=16）在2013-2020年期间。来源分布在10个不同的国家；然而，英格兰以14种出版物为主。我们发现了三个主要的地图报告病人的经验：（1）个人控制，（2）尊严，（3）我自己。对于护士的经验，我们发现了四个主要地图:(1)工作环境，(2)护理实践的变化,（3）隐私和尊严，（4）患者安全。
■我们建议病人和护士的经历主要是相互依存的，单间住宿的影响是一个庞大而复杂的问题，超出了医院的设计。
