PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
Introduction: To use a quantitative approach to examine the effects of family interventions on physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) in children aged 2. 5-12 years. Methods: PubMed, OVID, Web of Science, and others were searched from their inception to May 2020. Intervention studies that examined the effects of family interventions on PA among children aged 2.5-12 years were included in this meta-analysis. Lastly, subgroup analyses were conducted to examine the potential modifying effects of family intervention\'s characteristics and study quality. Results: Eleven articles met the inclusion criteria for this review. Studies investigated a range of PA outcomes, including moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA), total PA (TPA), daily steps, and SB levels. Meta-analysis showed that family intervention had a significant effect on PA [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.10; 95% CI = 0.01-0.19], especially for daily steps [weight means difference (WMD) = 1,006; 95% CI = 209-1,803], but not for SB (WMD = -0.38; 95% CI = -7.21-6.46). Subgroup analyses indicated the improvements in PA occurred when children were 6-12 years old, intervention focused on PA only, intervention duration ≤ 10 weeks, and \"low risk of bias\" study performed. Conclusions: Family intervention may be a promising way to promote children\'s PA levels, especially for daily steps. Trial Registration: Meta-analysis protocol was registered on PROSPERO: CRD42020193667.
摘要：
简介：使用定量方法研究家庭干预对2岁儿童身体活动（PA）和久坐行为（SB）的影响。5-12年。方法:PubMed,OVID,WebofScience,其他人从成立之初到2020年5月进行了搜索。这项荟萃分析纳入了调查家庭干预对2.5-12岁儿童PA影响的干预研究。最后,我们进行了亚组分析，以检查家庭干预的特征和研究质量的潜在改变效应。结果：11篇文章符合本次综述的纳入标准。研究调查了一系列PA结果，包括中度至重度PA（MVPA），总PA（TPA），每天的步骤，SB级别。Meta分析显示,家庭干预对PA有显著影响[标准化均差(SMD)=0.10;95%CI=0.01-0.19],特别是对于每日步数[体重均值差（WMD）=1,006；95％CI=209-1,803]，但不适用于SB（WMD=-0.38；95%CI=-7.21-6.46）。亚组分析表明，当儿童在6-12岁时，PA的改善发生。仅针对PA的干预，干预持续时间≤10周，和“低偏倚风险”研究。结论:家庭干预可能是提高儿童PA水平的一种有希望的方法。尤其是日常步骤。试验注册：Meta分析方案在PROSPERO：CRD42020193667上注册。
