PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: Clinical practice guidelines are an essential tool for translating evidence into practice. Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) checklist assists to guide the reporting in guidelines. We used RIGHT to assess the reporting completeness and quality of guidelines on colorectal cancer (CRC).
UNASSIGNED: We searched the electronic databases Medline (via PubMed), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang and Chinese Biomedical Literature (CBM) from January 1st, 2018 to December 1st, 2020 for guidelines on CRC. Websites of guideline development organizations were also searched. Two investigators assessed the reporting quality of the included guidelines, and calculated the numbers of guidelines that were compliant with each RIGHT checklist item and the mean proportions of reported items for each of the seven RIGHT checklist domains.
UNASSIGNED: Twenty-seven colorectal guidelines were included. The proportions of reported items in each RIGHT domain were 71.0% for Basic information, 66.2% for Background, 45.9% for Evidence, 68.8% for Recommendations, 24.1% for Review and quality assurance, 33.3% for Funding and declaration and management of interests, and 40.7% for Other information.
UNASSIGNED: The reporting quality of colorectal guidelines was moderate. A systematic use of the RIGHT checklist during the development process could improve the reporting quality of guidelines in the future.
UNASSIGNED: We searched the electronic databases Medline (via PubMed), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang and Chinese Biomedical Literature (CBM) from January 1st, 2018 to December 1st, 2020 for guidelines on CRC. Websites of guideline development organizations were also searched. Two investigators assessed the reporting quality of the included guidelines, and calculated the numbers of guidelines that were compliant with each RIGHT checklist item and the mean proportions of reported items for each of the seven RIGHT checklist domains.
UNASSIGNED: Twenty-seven colorectal guidelines were included. The proportions of reported items in each RIGHT domain were 71.0% for Basic information, 66.2% for Background, 45.9% for Evidence, 68.8% for Recommendations, 24.1% for Review and quality assurance, 33.3% for Funding and declaration and management of interests, and 40.7% for Other information.
UNASSIGNED: The reporting quality of colorectal guidelines was moderate. A systematic use of the RIGHT checklist during the development process could improve the reporting quality of guidelines in the future.
摘要：
■临床实践指南是将证据转化为实践的重要工具。医疗保健实践指南的报告项目（RIGHT）清单有助于指导指南中的报告。我们使用RIGHT评估结直肠癌（CRC）指南的报告完整性和质量。
■我们搜索了电子数据库Medline（通过PubMed），中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI),万方和中国生物医学文献（CBM）从1月1日，2018年12月1日,2020年为CRC指南。还搜索了指南制定组织的网站。两名调查人员评估了纳入指南的报告质量，并计算符合每个RIGHT检查表项目的指南数量以及七个RIGHT检查表域中每个报告项目的平均比例。
■纳入了27项结直肠指南。对于基本信息，每个右域中报告的项目比例为71.0%，66.2%为背景，45.9%的证据，68.8%的建议，24.1%用于审查和质量保证，33.3%用于资金和利益申报和管理，其他信息为40.7%。
■结直肠指南的报告质量中等。在开发过程中系统地使用正确的清单可以提高将来指南的报告质量。
■我们搜索了电子数据库Medline（通过PubMed），中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI),万方和中国生物医学文献（CBM）从1月1日，2018年12月1日,2020年为CRC指南。还搜索了指南制定组织的网站。两名调查人员评估了纳入指南的报告质量，并计算符合每个RIGHT检查表项目的指南数量以及七个RIGHT检查表域中每个报告项目的平均比例。
■纳入了27项结直肠指南。对于基本信息，每个右域中报告的项目比例为71.0%，66.2%为背景，45.9%的证据，68.8%的建议，24.1%用于审查和质量保证，33.3%用于资金和利益申报和管理，其他信息为40.7%。
■结直肠指南的报告质量中等。在开发过程中系统地使用正确的清单可以提高将来指南的报告质量。
