%0 Journal Article
%T Reporting quality of practice guidelines on colorectal cancer: evaluation using the RIGHT reporting checklist.
%A Han J
%A Tao M
%A Wu X
%A Li D
%A Ma Y
%A Dawood S
%A Steele CW
%A Tan KK
%A Wang Q
%J Ann Transl Med
%V 9
%N 14
%D Jul 2021
%M 34430616
%F 3.616
%R 10.21037/atm-21-2798
%X UNASSIGNED: Clinical practice guidelines are an essential tool for translating evidence into practice. Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) checklist assists to guide the reporting in guidelines. We used RIGHT to assess the reporting completeness and quality of guidelines on colorectal cancer (CRC).
UNASSIGNED: We searched the electronic databases Medline (via PubMed), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang and Chinese Biomedical Literature (CBM) from January 1st, 2018 to December 1st, 2020 for guidelines on CRC. Websites of guideline development organizations were also searched. Two investigators assessed the reporting quality of the included guidelines, and calculated the numbers of guidelines that were compliant with each RIGHT checklist item and the mean proportions of reported items for each of the seven RIGHT checklist domains.
UNASSIGNED: Twenty-seven colorectal guidelines were included. The proportions of reported items in each RIGHT domain were 71.0% for Basic information, 66.2% for Background, 45.9% for Evidence, 68.8% for Recommendations, 24.1% for Review and quality assurance, 33.3% for Funding and declaration and management of interests, and 40.7% for Other information.
UNASSIGNED: The reporting quality of colorectal guidelines was moderate. A systematic use of the RIGHT checklist during the development process could improve the reporting quality of guidelines in the future.