METHODS: A survey consisted of 47 perimetry programs. Orthoptists and neuro-ophthalmologists were asked which perimetry programs they considered important for use in the four neurological conditions. These programs were short-listed for discussion in a consensus meeting. A nominal group technique was used for the consensus meeting to reach consensus on the three most favoured perimetry programs appropriate for the four conditions.
RESULTS: Twenty-six participants completed the survey (51% return rate). Nine programs were found to be not applicable to any of the conditions. The short-lists for the conditions varied between six and ten perimetry programs. Seven participants discussed the survey results at a consensus meeting to agree the three most favoured perimetry programs for IIH, optic neuropathy and chiasmal compression (manual/semi manual kinetic, static 30-2 and full-field 120) and for stroke (manual/semi manual kinetic, static 30-2 and monocular Esterman).
CONCLUSIONS: A wide range of perimetry programmes were explored thoroughly through survey and consensus methods in order to determine clinician preference for their use in neuro-ophthalmic practice. The three most favoured perimetry programs for the four conditions was established.
方法:一项调查包括47个视野检查项目。直视学家和神经眼科医生被问及他们认为在四种神经系统疾病中使用哪种视野检查程序很重要。这些计划被入围,以在共识会议上进行讨论。共识会议使用了名义分组技术,以就适合这四个条件的三个最受欢迎的视野检查程序达成共识。
结果:26名参与者完成了调查(回报率为51%)。发现九个程序不适用于任何条件。条件的短列表在六个到十个视野检查程序之间变化。七名与会者在一次共识会议上讨论了调查结果,以商定IIH最受青睐的三个视野检查计划,视神经病变和交叉压迫(手动/半手动动力学,静态30-2和全场120)和行程(手动/半手动动力学,静态30-2和单眼Esterman)。
结论:通过调查和共识方法彻底探索了广泛的视野检查计划,以确定临床医生对其在神经眼科实践中使用的偏好。建立了针对这四个条件的三个最受欢迎的视野检查程序。