PDF(Sci-hub)
Abstract：
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate similarities and differences for 18 sports toward canoe/kayak in order to identify donorsport and/or multisports, based upon a systematic analysis of the task constraints per sport that are assumed to be either crucial or less important from the coaches\' viewpoint.
METHODS: Descriptive survey analysis.
METHODS: 891 certified coaches from 19 sports valued (0-10; not important at all-very important) 15 characteristics by a questionnaire (Flemish Sports Compass) within their sport. Unique sport-profiles (discriminant analysis - DA) were constructed for 19 sports based on these characteristics. Similarities and differences between canoe/kayak and the other 18 sports were analyzed by means of MANOVAs on anthropometric, physical and motor coordination characteristics.
RESULTS: Cross validated DA (rcan=0.660, Wilks\' Lambda=0.564, p<0.001) showed that 72.1% of the canoe/kayak coaches were correctly assigned to their sport. For canoe/kayak seven characteristics were valued crucial; dynamic balance (8.51±1.69), core stability (8.45±2.27), pulling power (8.12±1.68), speed (7.54±2.07), endurance (7.27±2.03), stature (6.43±1.41) and rhythm (6.01±3.01). Least important characteristics were: flexibility (6.16±1.75), agility (4.27±3.10), catching (3.90±3.22), climbing (2.45±3.05), jumping (1.81±2.11), throwing (1.60±2.24), hitting (.94±1.77) and kicking (.61±1.04).
CONCLUSIONS: This novel approach to determine important characteristics per sport makes identifying similarities and differences between sports possible. Similarities might enlarge talent-pools for possible talent transfers. Differences can help identify sports based on complementary characteristics for the construction of broad motor development programs. From this viewpoint gymnastics can serve as potential donorsport (similarities) for canoe/kayak, while handball and tennis can subserve broad development for young canoe/kayak athletes.
METHODS: Descriptive survey analysis.
METHODS: 891 certified coaches from 19 sports valued (0-10; not important at all-very important) 15 characteristics by a questionnaire (Flemish Sports Compass) within their sport. Unique sport-profiles (discriminant analysis - DA) were constructed for 19 sports based on these characteristics. Similarities and differences between canoe/kayak and the other 18 sports were analyzed by means of MANOVAs on anthropometric, physical and motor coordination characteristics.
RESULTS: Cross validated DA (rcan=0.660, Wilks\' Lambda=0.564, p<0.001) showed that 72.1% of the canoe/kayak coaches were correctly assigned to their sport. For canoe/kayak seven characteristics were valued crucial; dynamic balance (8.51±1.69), core stability (8.45±2.27), pulling power (8.12±1.68), speed (7.54±2.07), endurance (7.27±2.03), stature (6.43±1.41) and rhythm (6.01±3.01). Least important characteristics were: flexibility (6.16±1.75), agility (4.27±3.10), catching (3.90±3.22), climbing (2.45±3.05), jumping (1.81±2.11), throwing (1.60±2.24), hitting (.94±1.77) and kicking (.61±1.04).
CONCLUSIONS: This novel approach to determine important characteristics per sport makes identifying similarities and differences between sports possible. Similarities might enlarge talent-pools for possible talent transfers. Differences can help identify sports based on complementary characteristics for the construction of broad motor development programs. From this viewpoint gymnastics can serve as potential donorsport (similarities) for canoe/kayak, while handball and tennis can subserve broad development for young canoe/kayak athletes.
摘要：
目的：这项研究的目的是调查独木舟/皮划艇的18项运动的异同，以确定donorsport和/或多项运动。基于对每项运动的任务约束的系统分析，从教练的角度来看，这些约束被认为是至关重要的或不太重要的。
方法：描述性调查分析。
方法：891名来自19项运动的认证教练通过问卷调查（佛兰德运动指南针）在他们的运动中评估了15个特征（0-10；根本不重要-非常重要）。基于这些特征，为19项运动构建了独特的运动概况（判别分析-DA）。通过MANOVA在人体测量学上分析了独木舟/皮划艇与其他18项运动之间的异同，身体和运动协调特征。
结果：交叉验证的DA（rcan=0.660，Wilks\'Lambda=0.564，p<0.001）表明72.1％的独木舟/皮划艇教练被正确分配到他们的运动中。对于独木舟/皮划艇，七个特征的价值至关重要；动态平衡(8.51±1.69)，岩心稳定性(8.45±2.27),拉力(8.12±1.68),速度(7.54±2.07),耐久性(7.27±2.03),身高（6.43±1.41）和节律（6.01±3.01）。最不重要的特征是：灵活性(6.16±1.75)，敏捷性(4.27±3.10)，捕获（3.90±3.22），爬升（2.45±3.05），跳跃（1.81±2.11），投掷（1.60±2.24），击球(0.94±1.77)和踢球(0.61±1.04)。
结论：这种确定每种运动的重要特征的新颖方法使得确定运动之间的异同成为可能。相似性可能会扩大人才库，以进行可能的人才转移。差异可以帮助识别基于互补特征的运动，以构建广泛的运动发展计划。从这个角度来看，体操可以作为独木舟/皮划艇的潜在捐赠运动（相似之处），而手球和网球可以为年轻的独木舟/皮划艇运动员提供广泛的发展。
方法：描述性调查分析。
方法：891名来自19项运动的认证教练通过问卷调查（佛兰德运动指南针）在他们的运动中评估了15个特征（0-10；根本不重要-非常重要）。基于这些特征，为19项运动构建了独特的运动概况（判别分析-DA）。通过MANOVA在人体测量学上分析了独木舟/皮划艇与其他18项运动之间的异同，身体和运动协调特征。
结果：交叉验证的DA（rcan=0.660，Wilks\'Lambda=0.564，p<0.001）表明72.1％的独木舟/皮划艇教练被正确分配到他们的运动中。对于独木舟/皮划艇，七个特征的价值至关重要；动态平衡(8.51±1.69)，岩心稳定性(8.45±2.27),拉力(8.12±1.68),速度(7.54±2.07),耐久性(7.27±2.03),身高（6.43±1.41）和节律（6.01±3.01）。最不重要的特征是：灵活性(6.16±1.75)，敏捷性(4.27±3.10)，捕获（3.90±3.22），爬升（2.45±3.05），跳跃（1.81±2.11），投掷（1.60±2.24），击球(0.94±1.77)和踢球(0.61±1.04)。
结论：这种确定每种运动的重要特征的新颖方法使得确定运动之间的异同成为可能。相似性可能会扩大人才库，以进行可能的人才转移。差异可以帮助识别基于互补特征的运动，以构建广泛的运动发展计划。从这个角度来看，体操可以作为独木舟/皮划艇的潜在捐赠运动（相似之处），而手球和网球可以为年轻的独木舟/皮划艇运动员提供广泛的发展。
