PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the marginal adaptation of three or four unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) fabricated with digital impression techniques to those fabricated using any other impression technique.
UNASSIGNED: Database/electronic searches were conducted till August 2019 in PUBMED-MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane library. To identify published articles, multiple keywords were used to develop a search strategy in various combinations. Manual searching of articles was also done. Clinicaltrials.gov.in WHOICTRP and CTRI websites were also searched. Two independent reviewers (TP and VK) assessed eligibility for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed quality using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.
UNASSIGNED: Database search identified 497 citations and four citations through manual search. After removing duplicates and going through abstracts, 23 articles were perused for full-text screening. Two articles met the inclusion criteria; characteristics were described qualitatively, with two studies having overall low risk of bias.
UNASSIGNED: Marginal adaptation of FDPs fabricated using the digital and conventional impressions method was within the clinically acceptable limits. However, more robust clinical trials need to be conducted with large sample size to validate the conclusions.
UNASSIGNED: Database/electronic searches were conducted till August 2019 in PUBMED-MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane library. To identify published articles, multiple keywords were used to develop a search strategy in various combinations. Manual searching of articles was also done. Clinicaltrials.gov.in WHOICTRP and CTRI websites were also searched. Two independent reviewers (TP and VK) assessed eligibility for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed quality using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.
UNASSIGNED: Database search identified 497 citations and four citations through manual search. After removing duplicates and going through abstracts, 23 articles were perused for full-text screening. Two articles met the inclusion criteria; characteristics were described qualitatively, with two studies having overall low risk of bias.
UNASSIGNED: Marginal adaptation of FDPs fabricated using the digital and conventional impressions method was within the clinically acceptable limits. However, more robust clinical trials need to be conducted with large sample size to validate the conclusions.
摘要：
■这项系统评价的目的是研究使用数字印模技术制造的三个或四个单元固定假牙（FDP）对使用任何其他印模技术制造的假牙的边缘适应性。
■数据库/电子搜索在PUBMED-MEDLINE进行到2019年8月，Scopus,科克伦图书馆为了识别已发表的文章，使用多个关键字以各种组合开发搜索策略。还进行了文章的手动搜索。Clinicaltrials.gov.在WHOICTRP和CTRI网站也进行了搜索。两名独立审稿人(TP和VK)评估了入选资格，提取的数据，并使用Cochrane偏差风险工具评估质量。
■数据库搜索通过手动搜索确定了497次引用和4次引用。删除重复项并通过摘要后，23篇文章进行了全文筛选。两篇文章符合纳入标准；定性描述了特征，两项研究总体偏倚风险较低。
■使用数字和常规印象方法制造的FDP的边际适应在临床可接受的范围内。然而,更可靠的临床试验需要进行大样本量来验证结论.
■数据库/电子搜索在PUBMED-MEDLINE进行到2019年8月，Scopus,科克伦图书馆为了识别已发表的文章，使用多个关键字以各种组合开发搜索策略。还进行了文章的手动搜索。Clinicaltrials.gov.在WHOICTRP和CTRI网站也进行了搜索。两名独立审稿人(TP和VK)评估了入选资格，提取的数据，并使用Cochrane偏差风险工具评估质量。
■数据库搜索通过手动搜索确定了497次引用和4次引用。删除重复项并通过摘要后，23篇文章进行了全文筛选。两篇文章符合纳入标准；定性描述了特征，两项研究总体偏倚风险较低。
■使用数字和常规印象方法制造的FDP的边际适应在临床可接受的范围内。然而,更可靠的临床试验需要进行大样本量来验证结论.
