METHODS: In this single-center retrospective case-control study, we evaluated >14-year-old patients with serologically confirmed EBV-IM or CMV-IM during 2006-2017. We compared the patients\' symptoms, physical findings, blood counts, and serum biomarkers to create three regression models: model 1 (symptoms and signs), model 2 (model 1 plus sonographic hepatosplenomegaly and blood counts), and model 3 (model 2 plus hepatobiliary biomarkers).
RESULTS: Among the 122 patients (72.6%) with EBV-IM and 46 patients (27.4%) with CMV-IM, the median age was 25 years and 82 patients (48.8%) were male. The median age was 10 years older in the CMV-IM group (p < 0.001) and the median interval from onset to visit was 5 days longer in the CMV-IM group (p < 0.001). Logistic regression revealed that EBV-IM was predicted by younger age, short onset-to-visit interval, lymphadenopathy, tonsillar white coat, hepatosplenomegaly, atypical lymphocytosis, and elevations of lactate dehydrogenase and gamma-glutamyl transferase. All regression models had areas under the curve of >0.9.
CONCLUSIONS: History and physical findings, especially when used with atypical lymphocytosis and sonographic hepatosplenomegaly, can help physicians differentiate EBV-IM from CMV-IM.
方法:在这项单中心回顾性病例对照研究中,我们在2006-2017年期间评估了血清学证实为EBV-IM或CMV-IM的>14岁患者.我们比较了病人的症状,物理发现,血细胞计数,和血清生物标志物来创建三个回归模型:模型1(症状和体征),模型2(模型1加超声肝脾肿大和血细胞计数),和模型3(模型2加肝胆生物标志物)。
结果:在122例(72.6%)EBV-IM患者和46例(27.4%)CMV-IM患者中,中位年龄为25岁,82例患者(48.8%)为男性.CMV-IM组的中位年龄大于10岁(p<0.001),CMV-IM组的发病到就诊的中位间隔延长了5天(p<0.001)。Logistic回归显示EBV-IM的预测年龄较小,发病时间间隔短,淋巴结病,扁桃体白色外套,肝脾肿大,非典型淋巴细胞增多症,乳酸脱氢酶和γ-谷氨酰转移酶的升高。所有回归模型的曲线下面积>0.9。
结论:历史和身体发现,特别是当使用非典型淋巴细胞增多症和超声肝脾肿大时,可以帮助医生区分EBV-IM和CMV-IM。