Abstract:
Several aspects of the quality of life (QoL) and treatment satisfaction of patients with dry eye disease (DED) may be underestimated. Ocular symptoms, which are assessed by validated patient-reported questionnaires and may include stinging, burning, itchiness, grittiness, dryness and discomfort, reduce QoL by affecting daily activities and work productivity. Self-reported symptoms do not always correlate with post-treatment improvements in clinical measures such as tear film break-up time, inflammation and osmolarity. Thus, treatments may improve clinical ocular features without improving symptoms that affect daily life. This review explores 1500 abstracts from congress presentations and peer-reviewed journals for QoL and treatment satisfaction data on the use of active lubricants, osmoprotectants, secretagogues, and immunomodulators present in topical formulations for DED treatment, and validated symptom questionnaires. Patient-reported symptoms of DED are generally improved after treatment with topical formulations for tear replacement, tear stimulation or anti-inflammatory therapy compared with baseline or a control treatment. However, more data are required to compare the performance of active ingredients. It is fundamental to diagnose patients with DED accurately, recognising the major cause behind their dry eyes. Studies are also necessary to identify how patient satisfaction and QoL may be improved through long-term use of topical preparations. We conclude that careful and thorough consideration of patient-reported symptoms should be integrated into DED management to help tailor treatment to patient needs.