目的:针对有影响力的机构,对全球科学出版物进行非药物和非镇静催眠治疗失眠的文献计量分析,出版物,国家,研究热点,趋势,和边界。
方法:通过搜索WebofScienceCoreCollection(WoSCC)和中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)数据库进行了文献综述,以确定与2000年至2021年非药物和非镇静催眠治疗失眠相关的所有出版物。审查了符合条件的出版物,包括年度出版物增量,引文分析,国际合作,和关键词分析。使用CiteSpace(vers5.8。R3,6.1.R2和6.1.6,计算与信息学学院,费城,PA,美国)并通过知识地图进行虚拟化。结果:总的来说,该分析中包括9832篇出版物。WoSCC的结果显示,美利坚合众国(Count=2268,40.33%),斯坦福大学(计数=141,2.51%),美国卫生和人类服务部是领先的国家,研究所,和资助机构关于出版物数量,分别。“认知行为疗法”是引用引用的最受欢迎的研究课题。最常见的共同出现的关键词是失眠,认知行为疗法,无序,抑郁症,生活质量,Meta分析,年长的成年人,睡眠,患病率和疗效,而关键词包括临床实践指南,指导方针,和太极拳在2021年之后仍然很受欢迎。昼夜节律是2000-2021年最强的研究前沿。在中国,成都中医药大学(Count=69,4.79%)是该领域最具生产力的学院。中国文学中最常见的关键词是睡眠障碍,睡眠质量,针灸,帕金森病,经颅磁刺激,健康教育,音乐疗法,慢性失眠,生活质量,和非运动症状。中药是2019-2021年最强的研究前沿。
结论:这项文献计量学研究提供了详尽的绘图,涵盖了相关研究所,出版物,有影响力的文章,全球非药物和非镇静催眠治疗失眠趋势的研究人员和主题。结果表明,研究趋势已从非药物和非镇静催眠治疗失眠的有效性和安全性的主要研究转向合并症研究。临床实践指南将有可能成为2021年后这一领域的研究前沿。这些发现对研究人员来说很重要,临床医生,期刊编辑,以及在非药物和非镇静催眠治疗失眠领域工作的政策制定者,以了解当前研究的优势和潜力,并指导未来的临床实践,研究,科学政策。
OBJECTIVE: To present a bibliometric analysis of global scientific publications on the nondrug and nonsedative hypnotic treatment of insomnia with regard to influential institutions, publications, countries, research hotspots, trends, and frontiers.
METHODS: A literature review was conducted by searching the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases to identify all publications related to the nondrug and nonsedative hypnotic treatment of insomnia from 2000 to 2021. Eligible publications were reviewed, including annual publication increments, citation analyses, international collaborations, and keyword analyses. The data were analysed using CiteSpace (vers5.8.R3, 6.1.R2 and 6.1.6, College of Computing and Informatics, Philadelphia, PA, USA) and virtualized by knowledge maps. RESULTS:In total, 9832 publications were included in this analysis. The results from the WoSCC showed that the United States of America (Count = 2268, 40.33%), Stanford University (Count = 141, 2.51%), and the United States Department of Health and Human Services were the leading country, institute, and funding agency regarding the number of publications, respectively. \'Cognitive-behavioural therapy\" was the most popular research topic generated from the cocited reference. The most frequently co-occurring keywords were insomnia, cognitive behavioural therapy, disorder, depression, quality of life, Meta-analysis, older adult, sleep, prevalence and efficacy, while keywords including clinical practice guideline, guideline, and Tai Chi remained popular after 2021. Circadian rhythm was the strongest research frontier for 2000-2021. In China, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Count = 69, 4.79%) was the most productive institute in this field. The most frequently co-occurring keywords from Chinese literature were sleep disorder, sleep quality, acupuncture and moxibustion, Parkinson\'s disease, transcranial magnetic stimulation, health education, music therapy, chronic insomnia, quality of life, and nonmotor symptoms. Traditional Chinese medicine was the strongest research frontier for 2019-2021.
CONCLUSIONS: This bibliometric study provides an exhaustive mapping encompassing pertinent institute, publications, influential articles, researchers and topics of the global trend of nondrug and nonsedative hypnotic treatment for insomnia. The results show that the research trend has shifted from primary studies on the efficacy and safety of nondrug and nonsedative hypnotic treatment for insomnia to comorbidity studies. Clinical practice guidelines will potentially become the research frontier for this field post-2021. The findings are important for researchers, clinicians, journal editors, and policy-makers working in the field of nondrug and nonsedative hypnotic treatment for insomnia to understand the strengths and potentials in the current studies and guide future clinical practice, research, and science policy.