BACKGROUND: Individuals with high blood pressure in India often miss essential follow-up visits. Missed visits contribute to gaps across the hypertension care continuum and preventable cardiovascular disease. Widespread misconceptions around hypertension care and treatment may contribute to low follow-up attendance rates, but to date, there is limited evidence of the effect of interventions to debunk such misconceptions on health-seeking behavior. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to measure whether combining information debunking commonly-held misconceptions with a standard reminder reduces missed follow-up visits among individuals with high blood pressure and investigated whether any observed effect was moderated through belief change.
METHODS: We recruited 388 patients with uncontrolled blood pressure from the outpatient wards of two public sub-district hospitals in Punjab, India. Participants randomly assigned to the intervention arm received two WhatsApp messages, sent 3 and 1 days before their physician-requested follow-up visit. The WhatsApp message began with a standard reminder, reminding participants of their upcoming follow-up visit and its purpose. Following the standard reminder, we included brief debunking statements aimed at acknowledging and correcting common misconceptions and misbeliefs about hypertension care seeking and treatment. Participants in the control group received usual care and did not receive any messages.
RESULTS: We did not find evidence that the enhanced WhatsApp reminders improved follow-up visit attendance (Main effect: 2.2 percentage points, p-value = 0.603), which remained low across both treatment (21.8%, 95% CI: 15.7%, 27.9%) and control groups (19.6%, 95% CI: 14.2%, 25.0%). Participants had widespread misconceptions about hypertension care but our debunking messages did not successfully correct these beliefs (p-value = 0.187).
CONCLUSIONS: This study re-affirms the challenge of continuity of care for chronic diseases in India and suggests that simple phone-based health communication methods may not suffice for changing prevalent misconceptions and improving health-seeking behavior.
BACKGROUND: The trial began on July 18th. We registered the trial on July 18th (before recruitment began), including the main outcomes, on the German Clinical Trial Register [Identifier: DRKS00029712] and published a pre-analysis plan in the Open Science Framework [osf.io/67g35].

OBJECTIVE: Black women are less likely to receive screening mammograms, are more likely to develop breast cancer at an earlier age, and more likely to die from breast cancer when compared to White women. Affordable Care Act (ACA) provisions decreased cost sharing for women\'s preventive screening, potentially mitigating screening disparities. We examined enrollment of a high-risk screening program before and after ACA implementation stratified by race.
METHODS: This retrospective, quasi-experimental study examined the ACA\'s impact on patient demographics at a high-risk breast cancer screening clinic from 02/28/2003 to 02/28/2019. Patient demographic data were abstracted from electronic medical records and descriptively compared in the pre- and post-ACA time periods. Interrupted time series (ITS) analysis using Poisson regression assessed yearly clinic enrollment rates by race using incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
RESULTS: Two thousand seven hundred and sixty-seven patients enrolled in the clinic. On average, patients were 46 years old (SD, ± 12), 82% were commercially insured, and 8% lived in a highly disadvantaged neighborhood. In ITS models accounting for trends over time, prior to ACA implementation, White patient enrollment was stable (IRR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02) while Black patient enrollment increased at 13% per year (IRR 1.13, 95% CI 1.05-1.22). Compared to the pre-ACA enrollment period, the post-ACA enrollment rate remained unchanged for White patients (IRR 0.99, 95% CI 0.97-1.01) but decreased by 17% per year for Black patients (IRR 0.83, 95% CI 0.74-0.92).
CONCLUSIONS: Black patient enrollment decreased at a high-risk breast cancer screening clinic post-ACA compared to the pre-ACA period, indicating a need to identify factors contributing to racial disparities in clinic enrollment.

OBJECTIVE: To explore men\'s health status and lifestyle risk profile and understand how they engage with preventive health care.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey within a sequential mixed-methods project.
METHODS: Four hundred thirty-one adult males, working or volunteering for the New South Wales Rural Fire Service (NSW RFS) completed the survey between September and November 2022. The survey captured demographic data, health status and lifestyle characteristics, as well as engagement with preventive health care.
RESULTS: Nearly three-quarters of respondents (n = 314; 72.8%) described themselves as being in good or very good health. Just 18.6% of respondents recorded a \'healthy\' body mass index (BMI), despite only 29.9% having been told by a doctor that they were overweight/obese. Most (n = 344; 79.8%) respondents identified having a regular general practitioner (GP)/general practice. Nearly all respondents described having had blood pressure measurements (n = 403; 93.5%) and lipid profile (n = 346, 80.3%) in the last 2 years. Having a regular GP/general practice was significantly associated with engaging in all preventive and screening activities, except having a dental check.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate a significant opportunity to support men to reduce lifestyle risk, despite their current engagement with general practice. Strategies need to support men and health professionals to have conversations about risk and risk reduction to promote behaviour change. Nurses are well placed to provide preventive health care to men in general practice. The general practice nurse has a key role in communicating lifestyle risk, supporting patients in modifying their behaviours and reducing the impact of such factors on their health and well-being.
UNASSIGNED: Communicating the importance of lifestyle risk factors is imperative in supporting men to achieve behavioural change in the reduction in lifestyle risk. Nurses are well-placed to take a leading role in this area.
UNASSIGNED: The STROBE checklist guided reporting.
UNASSIGNED: Survey development was undertaken in collaboration with members of the NSW RFS. Key contacts within the organisation were involved in reviewing the analysis and interpretation of findings.

UNASSIGNED: The northeastern state of Rhode Island (RI) has a Vaccinate Before You Graduate (VBYG) program that supplements the traditional primary care infrastructure by providing vaccines to adolescents while they are in school, with no out-of-pocket expenses. We analyzed data from RI\'s immunization registry to evaluate whether VBYG also reduces disparities in adolescent immunization rates.
UNASSIGNED: We identified adolescent and catch-up vaccines administered in RI to people who were aged 11-18 at any point during the 5-year study period of 2019-2023, and conducted bivariate and multivariate analyses of vaccine administration data by setting (VBYG clinics, community health centers [CHCs], all other primary care practices [oPCPs], other school-based clinics, and other sites) and adolescent demographics (racial and ethnic identity, insurance status, sex, and age at time of vaccine).
UNASSIGNED: Of over 387,000 routine vaccines administered during the study period, 3.3 % were administered by a VBYG clinic despite significant declines during school closures associated with the early COVID-19 pandemic. VBYG-administered doses went to slightly older youth, and a higher proportion were catch-up doses (25.7 % versus 14.1 % for CHC doses and 6.5 % for oPCP). Youths received an average of 2.71 vaccines in VBYG clinics compared to 1.77 from oPCPs and 2.08 from CHCs. A higher proportion of vaccines administered by VBYG went to adolescents of color and those without private insurance than those administered by oPCPs.
UNASSIGNED: VBYG provides a model to other jurisdictions of a vaccine safety net for adolescents who may not otherwise receive recommended vaccines before exiting the school system.

The United States Preventive Services Task Force recommended routine anxiety screening for children and adolescents in 2022. This study describes the feasibility of routine anxiety screening in a primary care practice. It further examines the effects of routine anxiety screening on anxiety diagnoses and provider behavior in a setting in which anxiety screening was implemented five years in advance of the national guidelines. During the first year of implementation, approximately 80% of patients were screened, and 17% of screens were positive. A retrospective chart review of patients with positive screens found that the majority of positive screens led to a new diagnosis of anxiety and that half of newly diagnosed patients were prescribed an intervention. Screening was associated with an increase in diagnoses of anxiety disorders in the studied population from 9.6% to 13.3% (p<0.0001). Following the initial implementation, screening rates continued to rise, with an eventual plateau of >90%. Anxiety screening in the pediatric primary care setting is feasible and sustainable and led to increased provider recognition of anxiety and meaningful clinical action.

OBJECTIVE: Contraceptive method type matters to sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention, but contraceptive counseling often emphasizes method efficacy and the benefits of \"forgettable\" methods, including long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs). We aimed to explore associations between prescription method type and annual STI testing and investigated whether these associations relate to annual well-woman visits.
METHODS: We constructed a panel of 20,949 young women (<25) enrolled in Delaware\'s Medicaid program from 2012 through 2019. Conditional logit regressions measured associations between contraceptive method type and annual testing for gonorrhea, chlamydia, or syphilis. We stratified contraceptive methods into LARC, short-acting reversible methods (SARC; pills, patch, ring, and injectable), or no prescription method. We estimated three models examining STI testing in year of method initiation, in years afterwards, and attendance to a well-woman visit as a potential mediator of these associations.
RESULTS: STI testing rates did not differ between LARC versus SARC users in the year of method initiation. In the two years after method initiation, LARC versus SARC users were less likely to be tested (OR = 0.73 to OR = 0.87) and less likely to have a well-woman visit (OR = 0.65 to OR = 0.79). In models controlling for attendance to well-woman visits, the decreased likelihood of STI testing in years after initiating LARC versus SARC is largely eliminated, indicating that well-woman visits mediate the relationship between method type and STI testing.
CONCLUSIONS: LARC use relates to reduced STI testing in years after method initiation due to reduced attendance to well-women visits. These findings can inform clinical practice and STI prevention.

UNASSIGNED: To compare the characteristic competencies of public health nurses working for the older adult\'s health and welfare in public administration (\"PA\") with those at community general support centers (\"CGSC\") in Japan.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a questionnaire survey by mail for PA and CGSC public health nurses. A competency list that was developed to compare three groups (PA, CGSC experts with ≥5 years of experience, and CGSC newcomers with ≤2 years of experience) was used. The following characteristics were examined: (1) competencies acquired early after arriving at the CGSC, (2) competencies acquired through a certain amount of CGSC experience, (3) common competencies, (4) competencies that even experts lacked, and (5) competencies that the newcomers lacked.
UNASSIGNED: We examined the responses of 171 PA nurses, 185 CGSC expert public health nurses, and 165 CGSC newcomer public health nurses. The results of comparison of the three groups showed that (1) had no applicable items; (2) had nine items for individual support associated with preventive care management; (3) had 14 items including teamwork among three professionals (social workers, senior care manager, public health nurse)/other professionals and self-improvement; (4) had three items for community development, (5) had two items for individual support and 16 items for community development.
UNASSIGNED: Initiatives for preventive care and coordination of care teams should be supported and suggested as characteristic competencies for CGSC public health nurses.

UNASSIGNED: We sought to examine the influence of social needs on the relationship between cancer history and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening utilization among adults in the United States.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using data from the 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Our outcome of interest was utilization of guideline-concordant CRC screening and exposures of interest were cancer history/levels of social needs. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to examine the association.
UNASSIGNED: Among 74,743 eligible adults, a majority did not have a personal history of cancer (87.9 %), had at least one social need (58.4 %), and had undergone CRC screening (72.2 %). In multivariable analysis, a history of cancer was positively associated with use of CRC screening (OR = 1.59, 95 %CI, 1.35 - 1.87). Having at least one social need was associated with lower likelihood of being screened (one social need: OR = 0.85 95 %CI, 0.76 - 0.95; two + social needs: OR = 0.77, 95 % CI, 0.69 - 0.87). When exploring the effects of social needs, adults without a history of cancer who reported at least one need were 12-20 % less likely to be screened for CRC.
UNASSIGNED: A personal history of cancer was associated with greater utilization of CRC screening, whilst having at least one social need had lower screening use. Having social needs plays an important role in reducing screening uptake among adults without a history of cancer. Integrated care that considers both cancer history and social needs may have implications for improved adherence of CRC screening recommendations.

UNASSIGNED: To analyze the demographic and socioeconomic determinants of non-participation in cervical, colorectal and breast cancer screening programs in Denmark.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a cross-sectional study involving all women aged 53-65 years residing in Denmark on March 31, 2018, utilizing comprehensive individual data from population registries. Logistic regression models were employed to assess associations between demographic and socioeconomic factors and non-participation compared with participating in one, two, and three cancer screening programs, presenting odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Both unadjusted and adjusted models were applied for each level of screening participation.
UNASSIGNED: Significant associations with non-participation in the three cancer screening programs were observed across all demographic and socioeconomic covariates considered. Women with low incomes demonstrated the highest likelihood of non-participation (none vs. three programs attended, OR: 2.95, 95 % CI: 2.82-3.08). Similarly, increased odds of non-participation were noted among immigrants (Western immigrants: OR: 2.08, 95 % CI: 1.96-2.21; non-Western immigrants OR 1.26 95 % CI: 1.20-1.32), women living alone (OR: 2.08, 95 % CI: 2.02-2.14), women outside the labor force (OR: 1.92, 95 % CI: 1.86-1.99), and women with lower educational levels (OR: 1.44, 95 % CI: 1.39-1.50) in the model comparing non-participation to participating in three screening programs. A progressive intensification of the association with non-participation was noted with each incremental increase in screening participation (from one to two to three programs).
UNASSIGNED: Demographic and socioeconomic variables are significantly associated with non-participation in all three Danish cancer screening programs, particularly affecting women from vulnerable demographic and socioeconomic backgrounds. Future research should prioritize strategies to enhance participation within this subgroup, aiming to alleviate social inequities in cancer screening.

BACKGROUND: Patients in neurology intensive care units (ICU) are prone to pressure injuries (PU) due to factors such as severe illness, long-term bed rest, and physiological dysfunction. PU not only causes pain and complications to patients, but also increases medical burden, prolongs hospitalization time, and affects the recovery process.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and optimize the effectiveness of pressure injury prevention nursing measures in neurology ICU patients.
METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted, and 60 patients who were admitted to the ICU of the Department of Neurology were selected and divided into an observation group and a control group according to the order of admission, with 30 people in each group. The observation group implemented pressure injury prevention and nursing measures, while the control group adopted routine care.
RESULTS: Comparison between observation and control groups following pressure injury prevention nursing intervention revealed significantly lower incidence rates in the observation group compared to the control group at 48 h (8.3% vs 26.7%), 7 d (16.7% vs 43.3%), and 14 d (20.0% vs 50.0%). This suggests a substantial reduction in pressure injury incidence in the observation group, with the gap widening over time. Additionally, patients in the observation group exhibited quicker recovery, with a shorter average time to get out of bed (48 h vs 72 h) and a shorter average length of stay (12 d vs 15 d) compared to the control group. Furthermore, post-intervention, patients in the observation group reported significantly improved quality of life scores, including higher scores in body satisfaction, feeling and function, and comfort (both psychological and physiological), indicating enhanced overall well-being and comfort following the implementation of pressure injury prevention nursing measures.
CONCLUSIONS: Implementing pressure injury preventive care measures for neurology ICU patients will have better results.