OBJECTIVE: Workplace violence (WPV) is an important issue in prehospital care, especially for emergency medical technicians ( EMTs) who are at increased risk of physical violence due to the nature of their work. This study aimed to shed light on the specific factors that contribute to the underlying causes of physical WPV in the prehospital context through direct experience and insight into the work of EMTs.
METHODS: Sequential explanatory mixed methods were applied in five western provinces of Iran from 2022 to 2023. In total, 358 EMTs that met the criteria for the quantitative phase were selected using a multi-stage clustering method. In the quantitative phase, the researchers used a questionnaire on workplace violence in the healthcare sector. Based on the results of the quantitative phase, 21 technicians who had experienced physical violence in the past 12 months were invited for in-depth interviews in the qualitative phase.
RESULTS: The average age of the EMTs was 33.96 ± 6.86 years, with an average work experience of 10.57 ± 6.80 years. More than half (53.6%) of the staff worked 24-hour shifts. In addition, most EMTs were located in urban bases (50.3%), and 78 (21.8%) reported having experienced physical violence. No significant correlations were found between the demographic characteristics of the technicians and the frequency of physical violence, except base location in the last 6 months. The qualitative study also created one theme (the complexity of WPV in the prehospital setting), four categories, and ten subcategories.
CONCLUSIONS: The study\'s results emphasize the need for comprehensive WPV factors in the prehospital setting. These factors can lead to identifying and improving strategies such as organizational support, improving communication and collaboration between responders, and training in de-escalation techniques. In addition, it is crucial to address the root causes of WPV such as poverty and lack of education in the community to create a safer and more supportive environment for patients and staff.

The heterogeneous nature of asthma results in a wide range of presentations during exacerbation. Despite UK pre-hospital management guidelines focusing on β₂ agonists, variables such as cause, severity, underlying health, comorbidities, and drug side effects can often make emergency treatment optimisation difficult. This article examines paramedics\' methods of observing, perceiving, interpreting, and treating asthma with β₂ agonists, often acting on limited information in rapidly evolving situations. We recruited paramedics from a single UK National Health Service ambulance Trust for qualitative semi-structured interviews. Responses underwent framework analysis to identify data similarities and differences. Fifteen qualitative interviews with paramedics revealed three main themes affecting patient management: clinician experience of presentation, adaptation of patient management approaches, and severity of side effects. Paramedics felt their ability to manage various asthma presentations was enhanced through guideline adaptation based on their own clinical experience and understanding of β₂ agonist side effects, allowing tailored responses based on a set of reinforcing factors. Inductive analysis revealed additional complexities within these themes, such as anxiety and diabetes, which may influence β₂ agonist administration and result in multiple care pathways being initiated during exacerbation. Paramedic care mirrors asthma\'s complexity, accounting for a range of characteristics. A dynamic, critically thought approach enables patient management to be based on the presenting conditions rather than strict adherence to a single algorithm. Comprehending the complexities and variables in treatment can be crucial to how paramedics rationalise their treatment and optimise the care provided.

OBJECTIVE: To explore Finnish paramedics\' perceptions of work-related performance expectations in relation to work experience, and understand how organizational socialization contributes to understanding paramedics\' performance expectations.
METHODS: A qualitative design with a deductive-inductive approach utilizing a social constructivist framework. The organizational socialization framework by Wanberg was used as the theoretical basis.
METHODS: Data were collected between May and August 2023, using group and individual interviews of newly graduated (n = 9) and experienced paramedics (n = 13). Participants were recruited via social media channels. Data were first analyzed deductively, according to constructs of the organizational socialization framework (role clarity, task mastery, and social acceptance), then inductively, using codes not utilized in the deductive phase.
METHODS: Interviewed Finnish paramedics (N = 22), both newly graduated paramedics (n = 9) and experienced paramedics (n = 13). The interviews were performed remotely and then transcribed into text.
RESULTS: Our findings showed comparable performance expectations between newly graduated and experienced paramedics, mismatches in role clarity of paramedic work, challenges in both learning and upholding professional competence, and difficulties of social acceptance into the paramedic community. There were variations in how expectations were perceived between groups, indicating that experience might partly affect how paramedics identify and manage performance expectations. The organizational socialization framework enables the contextualization of these performance expectations.
CONCLUSIONS: Paramedic work involves challenges to upholding clinical competence, aligning to a professional role, and social integration into the professional community. Our research contributes to understanding how paramedics perceive these challenges as performance expectations in different stages of their careers and how they could be managed utilizing a framework for organizational socialization. The socialization of paramedics into the workforce needs to account for these performance expectations, especially considering the changing paradigm of paramedic work, role, and societal expectations.
UNASSIGNED: No Patient or Public Contribution.

BACKGROUND: Due to work commitments, shiftworkers often obtain inadequate sleep, consequently experiencing negative health, wellbeing, and safety outcomes. Given shiftworkers may have limited control over their work commitments, lifestyle and environmental factors within their control may present an intervention opportunity. However, such interventions require tailoring to ensure applicability for this sleep-vulnerable population.
METHODS: A randomised waitlist control pilot trial investigated the effectiveness of mobile health application Sleepfit, which delivered a tailored sleep health intervention aimed at improving sleep health and sleep hygiene outcomes amongst paramedic shiftworkers. Outcome measures of self-reported sleep health (sleep need, duration, and quality, fatigue, Insomnia Severity Index, Fatigue Severity Scale, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores) and sleep hygiene (Sleep Hygiene Index score) were collected at baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up.
RESULTS: Fifty-eight paramedics (aged 33.4 ± 8.0 years; 50% male) were recruited, and trialed Sleepfit for a 14-day intervention period between August 2021-January 2022. For all participants, there was a significant reduction in Insomnia Severity Index and Sleep Hygiene index scores after intervention engagement. Regression models demonstrated no significant intervention effect on sleep health or sleep hygiene outcomes (intervention versus waitlist control group). A high study drop-out rate (91.4%) prevented assessment of outcomes at 3-month follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Pilot trial findings demonstrate that Sleepfit may elicit improvements in sleep health and sleep hygiene outcomes amongst paramedic shiftworkers. However, low enrolment and retention means that findings should be interpreted with caution, further highlighting potential engagement challenges, especially among paramedics who are particularly in need of support for improved sleep.
BACKGROUND: Prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry 24/01/2020 (reference no. ACTRN12620000059965).

Background Ambulance callouts and conveyances continue to increase disproportionately to population growth. This is largely driven by low- and medium-acuity patients who do not require ambulance management. We aimed to estimate the proportion of patients paramedics have conveyed to an emergency department (ED) via ambulance whom they considered suitable for primary care, and understand the barriers that contributed to these decisions. Methods A cross-sectional survey of registered paramedics in Victoria, Australia, was undertaken using an online questionnaire during 2022. Responses are presented using descriptive statistics, and logistic regression was used to identify associations between paramedic characteristics and barriers influencing primary care pathway referral. Results A total of 367 responses were received. Of these, 70% of paramedics reported that at least half of the patients they conveyed to an ED were suitable for a primary care pathway. Paramedics reported high levels of confidence and support for primary care pathways in lieu of transport, however this had no correlation with their self-reported practice. The most common barrier to primary care pathway referral was limited access to a suitable primary care pathway (68%) followed by fear of an internal complaint, litigation or organisational pressure to convey patients to an ED (66%). Paramedics regarded themselves as more supportive of primary care pathway referral than those around them, including their peers, mentors, employers and university. They also reported that the COVID-19 pandemic had increased their personal support for primary care pathways, as well as organisational support from their employer, without corresponding increase in the broader medical and public communities. In fact, paramedics reported the COVID-19 pandemic had decreased support from the public and patients to refer patients to primary care pathways, and 57% of paramedics reported conveying a patient that had declined their primary care referral in the past week. Conclusions Paramedics frequently convey to an ED patients who they believe are appropriate for a primary care pathway. Paramedics face practical barriers such as a lack of available primary care providers and perceived lack of cultural support that contribute to this practice.

BACKGROUND: Paramedics are responsible for critical resuscitation decisions when attending Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrests (OHCA). Existing research indicates that a range of clinical and non-clinical factors moderate their decision-making. Within the United Kingdom (UK), there is little evidence on how and why paramedics make their decisions at actual OHCA events.
METHODS: We explored the experiences of UK paramedics using individually recalled OHCA events as catalysts for discussion. Pen portraits developed from semi-structured interviews with 31 paramedics across two UK ambulance services were thematically analysed, enabling cross-participant comparisons whilst retaining depth and context.
RESULTS: We identified four themes: uncertainties encountered in resuscitation guidelines, influences on decision-making, holistic perspectives, and indirect moderators. We found that paramedics experienced uncertainty at all stages of the resuscitation process. Uncertainties arose from indeterminate, ambiguous or complex information and were described as having both clinical and ethical dimensions. Whilst guidelines drove paramedics\' decisions, non-clinical personal, practical and relational factors moderated their assessments of survivability and decision-making, with attitudes to interactions between patient age, frailty and quality of life playing a substantial role. Coping strategies such as uncertainty reduction, assumption-based reasoning and weighing pros and cons were evident from interviews.
CONCLUSIONS: The complexity of interactions between clinical and non-clinical factors points to an element of variability in paramedics\' responses to uncertainty. Exploring UK paramedics\' uncertainties and decision-making during specific OHCA events can help acknowledge and address uncertainties in resuscitation guidelines and paramedic training, providing paramedics with the tools to manage uncertainty in a consistent and transparent way.

UNASSIGNED: Patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and large-vessel occlusion are frequently transferred by emergency physicians (EPs) from primary to comprehensive stroke centers (CSC) for thrombectomy, particular when thrombolysed. Data on complications during such transfers are highly limited.
UNASSIGNED: Consecutive AIS patients transferred between 01/2015 and 10/2021 to our CSC were included. Associations of major (MACO) and minor (MICO) complications with clinical and imaging data were assessed.
UNASSIGNED: In total, 985 patients were included in the analysis (58.5% thrombolysed). MACO developed in 1.6%, MICO in 14.6%. Compared to patients without complications (NOCO), patients with MACO did not differ in terms of demographics, cerebrovascular risk factors, or site of vessel occlusion. They had more severe strokes (p = 0.026), neurological worsening was more severe (p = 0.008), and transport duration was longer (p = 0.050) but geographical distances did not differ. Thrombolysed patients had any complication more often than patients without thrombolysis (20.3% vs 10.5%; p < 0.001); however, this finding was driven by patients with MICO (p < 0.001) only (MACO: p = 0.804). No associations were observed between stroke severity and complications in either thrombolysed or nonthrombolysed patients. Neurological deterioration during transfer was observed in 21.2%, but multivariate analysis revealed no association with thrombolysis (OR 0.962; 95%CI 0.670-1.380, p = 0.832). Asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was present in 1.1%, symptomatic in 0.1%.
UNASSIGNED: In this large cohort, no patient-specific factor increasing the risk of complications during interhospital transfer was identified. Specifically, our results do not indicate that thrombolysis increases MACO. Hence, interhospital transfer without EPs appears reasonable in most patients.

BACKGROUND: As first responders, paramedics are an extremely important part of the care chain. COVID-19 significantly impacted their working circumstances. We examined, according to the experiences and observations of paramedics, (1) what kinds of emotions the Emergency Medical Service (EMS) personnel experienced in their new working circumstances, and (2) what work-related factors became resources for the well-being of EMS personnel during the initial months of the COVID-19 pandemic.
METHODS: This qualitative study utilized reflective essay material written by experienced, advanced-level Finnish paramedics (n = 30). The essays used in this study were written during the fall of 2020 and reflected the period when Finland had declared a state of emergency (on 17.3.2020) and the Emergency Powers Act was implemented. The data was analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis.
RESULTS: The emotions experienced by the EMS personnel in their new working circumstances formed three themes: (1) New concerns arose that were constantly present; (2) Surviving without proper guidance; and (3) Rapidly approaching breaking point. Three themes were formed from work-related factors that were identified as resources for the well-being of the EMS personnel. These were: (1) A high level of organizational efficiency was achieved; (2) Adaptable EMS operations; and (3) Encouraging atmosphere.
CONCLUSIONS: Crisis management practices should be more attentive to personnel needs, ensuring that managerial and psychological support is readily available in crisis situations. Preparedness that ensures effective organizational adaptation also supports personnel well-being during sudden changes in working circumstances.

OBJECTIVE: Following recent changes to the German Narcotics Act, this article examines prehospital analgesia by paramedics using piritramide vs. nalbuphine + paracetamol.
METHODS: Prehospital analgesia administered by paramedics from the Fulda (piritramide) and Gütersloh (nalbuphine + paracetamol) emergency services was compared regarding pain intensity at the beginning and end of the mission, measured using the numeric rating scale (NRS). Additionally, an analysis of the resulting complications was carried out.
RESULTS: In this study 2429 administrations of analgesia were evaluated (nalbuphine + paracetamol: 1635, 67.3%, initial NRS: 8.0 ± 1.4, end of NRS: 3.7 ± 2.0; piritramide: 794, 32.7%, initial NRS: 8.5 ± 1.1, end of NRS: 4.5 ± 1.6). Factors influencing NRS change were initial NRS (regression coefficient, RC: 0.7075, 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.6503-0.7647, p < 0.001), treatment with nalbuphine + paracetamol (RC: 0.6048, 95% CI: 0.4396-0.7700, p < 0.001). Treatment with nalbuphine + paracetamol (n = 796 (48.7%)) compared to piritramide (n = 190 (23.9%)) increased the odds of achieving NRS < 4 (odds ratio, OR: 2.712, 95% CI: 2.227-3.303, p < 0.001). Complications occurred in n = 44 (5.5%) with piritramide and in n = 35 (2.1%) with nalbuphine + paracetamol. Risk factors for complications were analgesia with piritramide (OR: 2.699, 95% CI: 1.693-4.301, p < 0.001), female sex (OR: 2.372, 95% CI: 1.396-4.029, p = 0.0014), and age (OR: 1.013, 95% CI: 1.002-1.025, p = 0.0232).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with piritramide, prehospital analgesia with nalbuphine + paracetamol has favorable effects in terms of analgesic efficacy and complication rates and should therefore be considered in future recommendations for paramedics.
UNASSIGNED: FRAGESTELLUNG: Angesichts der Änderungen des Betäubungsmittelgesetzes untersucht die vorliegende Arbeit die prähospitale Analgesie durch Notfallsanitäter*innen mittels Piritramid vs. Nalbuphin + Paracetamol.
UNASSIGNED: Alle prähospitalen Analgesien durch Notfallsanitäter*innen der Rettungsdienste der Kreise Fulda (Piritramid) sowie Gütersloh (Nalbuphin + Paracetamol) wurden im Hinblick auf die Schmerzstärke anhand der Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) zu Einsatzbeginn und -ende sowie die aufgetretenen Komplikationen ausgewertet.
UNASSIGNED: Insgesamt wurden 2429 Analgesien ausgewertet (Nalbuphin + Paracetamol: 1635 (67,3 %), NRS-initial: 8,0 ± 1,4, NRS-Einsatzende: 3,7 ± 2,0; Piritramid: 794 (32,7 %), NRS-initial: 8,5 ± 1,1, NRS-Einsatzende: 4,5 ± 1,6). Faktoren mit Einfluss auf eine NRS-Veränderung waren: initiale NRS (Regressionskoeffizient (RK): 0,7075, 95 %-Konfidenzintervall (95 %-KI): 0,6503–0,7647, p < 0,001) sowie Therapie mit Nalbuphin + Paracetamol (RK: 0,6048, 95 %-KI: 0,4396–0,7700, p < 0,001). Die Therapie mit Nalbuphin + Paracetamol (n = 796 (48,7 %)) im Vergleich zu Piritramid (n = 190 (23,9 %)) erhöhte die Chancen, eine NRS < 4 am Einsatzende aufzuweisen (Odds Ratio (OR): 2,712, 95 %-KI: 2,227–3,303, p < 0,001). Komplikationen traten bei Therapie mit Piritramid bei n = 44 (5,5 %) und bei Nalbuphin + Paracetamol bei n = 35 (2,1 %) auf. Risikofaktoren für Komplikationen waren Analgesie mit Piritramid (OR: 2,699, 95 %-KI: 1,693–4,301, p < 0,001), weibliches Geschlecht (OR: 2,372, 95 %-KI: 1,396–4,029, p = 0,0014) sowie das Lebensalter (OR: 1,013, 95 %-KI: 1,002–1,025, p = 0,0232).
CONCLUSIONS: Im Vergleich mit Piritramid weist die prähospitale Analgesie mit Nalbuphin + Paracetamol günstige Effekte im Hinblick auf analgetische Effektivität und Komplikationsraten auf und sollte in zukünftigen Empfehlungen für Notfallsanitäter*innen berücksichtigt werden.

UNASSIGNED: Emergency department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine has proven efficacy, but many patients are reluctant to begin this treatment. This study evaluated SafetyNet, a program using a 2-person, recovery coach and paramedic (RCP) intervention postoverdose to reduce subsequent opioid overdose, engage patients in medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), and reduce illicit drug use.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a prospective nonrandomized study in individuals who experienced opioid overdoses, received naloxone, but subsequently declined buprenorphine initiation in the ED. Each participant was followed by an RCP team that performed a brief negotiation interview (BNI) to motivate engagement in treatment, peer-recovery coaching to encourage recovery-related activities, and health education around medical concerns by trained paramedics. Participants were followed-up at 30 and 180 days. The primary hypothesized outcome was reduction in overdose events; the secondary hypothesized outcomes were engagement in MOUD and reduction in opioid positive urine tests.
UNASSIGNED: Eighty-one patients were enrolled and received BNIs; 45 (56%; 95% CI: 44-67) had at least 1 follow-up encounter. Twenty participants (25%; 95% CI: 16-36) had at least 1 overdose during follow-up. Fifty-five participants (68%; 95% CI: 57-78) were confirmed to have engaged in some form of medication treatment. Differences in subsequent overdose events (P = .95), engagement in MOUD (P = .49), and rates of opioid-positive urine toxicology rates within 30 days (P = .44) and between 31 and 180 days (P = .46) were not significantly different when comparing those who did and did not follow-up.
UNASSIGNED: There were no differences in rates of subsequent overdose, MOUD engagement, or positive urine toxicology screens in our intervention. However, 68% of participants engaged in outpatient MOUD, a treatment associated with fewer overdose events, particularly fatal ones. Substantial limitations occurred due to the COVID pandemic, and sample size estimates were not met. Further research is needed to investigate potential benefits of the SafetyNet program.