BACKGROUND: The 9th edition of the TNM Classification for lung cancer delineates M1c into two subcategories: M1c1 (Multiple extrathoracic lesions within a single organ system) and M1c2 (Multiple extrathoracic lesions involving multiple organ systems). Existing research indicates that patients with lung cancer in stage M1c1 exhibit superior overall survival compared to those in stage M1c2. The primary frontline therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), lacking driver gene mutations, involves the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy. Nevertheless, a dearth of evidence exists regarding potential survival disparities between NSCLC patients with M1c1 and M1c2 undergoing first-line immune-chemotherapy, and reliable biomarkers for predicting treatment outcomes are elusive. Serum metabolic profiles may elucidate distinct prognostic mechanisms, necessitating the identification of divergent metabolites in M1c1 and M1c2 undergoing combination therapy. This study seeks to scrutinize survival discrepancies between various metastatic patterns (M1c1 and M1c2) and pinpoint metabolites associated with treatment outcomes in NSCLC patients undergoing first-line ICIs combined with chemotherapy.
METHODS: In this study, 33 NSCLC patients lacking driver gene mutations diagnosed with M1c1, and 22 similarly diagnosed with M1c2 according to the 9th edition of TNM Classification, were enrolled. These patients received first-line PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy. The relationship between metastatic patterns and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients undergoing combination therapy was analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. Serum samples were obtained from all patients before treatment initiation for untargeted metabolomics analysis, aiming to identify differential metabolites.
RESULTS: In the univariate analysis of PFS, NSCLC patients in M1c1 receiving first-line PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy exhibited an extended PFS (HR = 0.49, 95% CI, 0.27-0.88, p = 0.017). In multivariate PFS analyses, these M1c1 patients receiving first-line PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy also demonstrated prolonged PFS (HR = 0.45, 95% CI, 0.22-0.92, p = 0.028). The serum metabolic profiles of M1c1 and M1c2 undergoing first-line PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy displayed notable distinctions. In comparison to M1c1 patients, M1c2 patients exhibited alterations in various pathways pretreatment, including platelet activation, linoleic acid metabolism, and the VEGF signaling pathway. Diminished levels of lipid-associated metabolites (diacylglycerol, sphingomyelin) were correlated with adverse outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: NSCLC patients in M1c1, devoid of driver gene mutations, receiving first-line PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy, experienced superior outcomes compared to M1c2 patients. Moreover, metabolomic profiles strongly correlated with the prognosis of these patients, and M1c2 patients with unfavorable outcomes manifested distinct changes in metabolic pathways before treatment. These changes predominantly involved alterations in lipid metabolism, such as decreased diacylglycerol and sphingomyelin, which may impact tumor migration and invasion.

BACKGROUND: Surgery has been the standard procedure for resectable primary LC. Survival after stereotactic body radiation therapy, another treatment, is significantly biased due to preponderance of data from patients deemed unsuitable for surgery. We examined survival of patients refusing surgery in favor of radiation therapy.
METHODS: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to identify patients with primary Stage I NSCLC diagnosed between 2007 and 2016. Patients were excluded if it was unknown if they were recommended for surgery or if surgery was contraindicated. Multiple predictors were assessed: radiation versus surgery, age at diagnosis, sex, race/ethnicity, health insurance status, marital status, tumor size, and histology. A multivariate analysis was performed to estimate hazard ratios and generate Kaplan-Meier survival curves.
RESULTS: When adjusted for confounding variables, survival was greater for patients undergoing surgical resection than those refusing surgery in favor of radiation (HRadj 2.66; 95% CI: 2.27-3.11, p < 0.001) or for those receiving no standardized treatment (HRadj 4.43; 95% CI: 3.57-5.50, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: SBRT is an effective treatment for inoperable early LC but there is limited data comparing outcomes against surgical resection. When eligible for both, patients refusing surgery and choosing radiation had worse survival when adjusting for variables including age, tumor size, and histology, and suggests that surgical resection is a superior treatment modality.

BACKGROUND: Screening for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is crucial for identifying patients eligible for targeted therapy. The FDA-approved ALK (D5F3) immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay, used with the OptiView Amplification Kit, demonstrates excellent sensitivity and specificity in detecting these patients. However, the clinical significance of resulting focal positivity remains unclear, and ALK (D5F3) expression unrelated to ALK fusion is observed in some cases of neuroendocrine differentiation. This study aims to validate these findings with molecular testing and contribute to the accurate interpretation of ALK (D5F3) IHC results.
METHODS: A total of 1619 patients diagnosed with NSCLC and neuroendocrine carcinoma were evaluated using ALK (D5F3) IHC. For cases with strong but focal expression and those with diffuse strong positivity in neuroendocrine differentiation, ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and/or next-generation sequencing (NGS) tests were performed.
RESULTS: Seven out of 1109 adenocarcinomas (0.6%) and six out of 289 squamous cell carcinomas (2.1%) exhibited strong focal ALK (D5F3) expression. Nine out of 209 neuroendocrine carcinomas (4.3%) showed homogeneously strong ALK (D5F3) expression. All these cases, including adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation and combined small cell carcinoma, were negative for ALK fusions by FISH and/or NGS.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that strong but focal ALK (D5F3) immunostaining and strong expression in neuroendocrine differentiation may not indicate ALK fusion. By considering these findings, we can improve the accuracy of patient selection for targeted therapy by minimizing false-positive interpretations of ALK (D5F3) staining.

BACKGROUND: Patients with early-stage lung cancer and interstitial lung disease have a poorer prognosis than those without interstitial lung disease. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of lobar and sublobar resections in these patients.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 138 consecutive patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer and interstitial lung disease who underwent surgical treatment at two institutions between January 2010 and December 2020. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to adjust for baseline characteristics.
RESULTS: Thirty-six patients underwent sublobar resection and 102 underwent lobar resection. The median follow-up was 45.7 months. In all patients, 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 33.2% and 73.2%, and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 24.2% and 60.1% in the sublobar and lobar resection groups, respectively (p < 0.01, <0.01). Death due to lung cancer and locoregional recurrence were significantly more frequent in the sublobar resection group than in the lobar resection group (p = 0.034, <0.01, respectively). On propensity score matching analysis, the 5-year OS rates of the 19 matched pairs were 46.3% and 73.2%, and the RFS rates were 31.6% and 67.6% in the sublobar and lobar resection groups, respectively (p = 0.036, <0.01). The Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated a significant association between lobar resection and improved survival (p = 0.047).
CONCLUSIONS: The patients in the lobar resection group had better survival rates than those in the sublobar resection group. In terms of long-term prognosis, deliberately limited surgery may not be necessary for patients who tolerate lobectomy.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is little evidence supporting its use in older adults. Low-dose daily carboplatin combined with thoracic radiotherapy is considered a standard regimen for this population. To establish a simple and feasible carboplatin administration method, we conducted a study of weekly carboplatin and concurrent radiotherapy for older adults with locally advanced NSCLC.
METHODS: This prospective, single-arm, multicenter, phase II clinical trial included patients aged ≥75 years with unresectable stage III NSCLC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1. Patients received chemoradiotherapy (60 Gy/30 fractions plus concurrent weekly carboplatin at an area under curve of 2 mg mL-1 min-1). The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). Key secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.
RESULTS: From July 2020 to June 2022, 37 patients were enrolled from 15 institutions, and 36 patients were evaluable for efficacy and safety. The ORR was 63.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 47.6-77.5). Median PFS was 14.6 months (95% CI = 9.1-18.1). Median OS was 25.5 months (95% CI = 17.4-not reached). Grade 4 leucopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were observed in one patient (2.8%) each.
CONCLUSIONS: Weekly carboplatin and concurrent radiation therapy was safe in older adults with locally advanced NSCLC, and promising activity was observed.

BACKGROUND: Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene are the most common targetable gene alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In Japan, approximately 40% of patients who undergo surgical resection for non-squamous NSCLC have EGFR mutations. However, no long-term studies have been conducted including a large number of EGFR-positive NSCLC patients with postoperative recurrence (PR).
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of the data of EGFR-positive NSCLC patients with PR who had undergone surgery at the Shizuoka Cancer Center between October 2002 and November 2017. We evaluated post-recurrence overall survival (PRS) and postoperative overall survival (POS) using the Kaplan-Meier method and identify any associations between the clinical variables at recurrence and PRS using univariate and multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: We enrolled 162 patients. The median observation time for PRS was 4.95 years (range, 0.82-13.25) and POS was 5.81 years (range, 2.84-16.71). The median PRS was 5.17 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.90-5.61) and POS was 7.07 years (95% CI, 5.88-8.01). Univariate analysis identified male sex (median PRS: 3.32 vs. 5.39 years; p < 0.05), bone metastasis (median PRS: 2.43 vs. 5.33 years; p < 0.05), and central nervous system (CNS) metastasis (median PRS: 3.05 vs. 5.39 years; p < 0.05) and multivariate analysis identified bone metastasis (hazard ratio [HR], 2.01; 95% CI, 1.23-3.28; p < 0.05) and CNS metastasis (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.14-2.98; p < 0.05) as poor prognostic factors. The pattern of recurrence (oligo vs. non-oligo recurrence) was not a prognostic factor. Logistic regression analysis revealed the association between sex and the presence bone/CNS metastasis at recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data may help visualize future prospects and determine the timing of osimertinib initiation. New treatment strategies need to be developed for patients with bone/CNS metastasis at the first recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide despite advances in cancer therapeutics. In several gynecological cancers, anti-Müllerian hormone receptor type 2 (AMHR2) mediates AMH-induced growth inhibition and is expressed at high levels. Furthermore, 5%-8% of NSCLCs exhibit high AMHR2 expression, suggesting that AMH may inhibit the progression of some lung cancers. However, the clinical relevance of AMHR2 expression and its role in lung cancer is not fully clarified.
METHODS: Immunostaining was performed on 79 surgical specimens of NSCLC. The Cancer Genome Atlas RNA-seq data for lung adenocarcinoma were analyzed, and gene ontology and gene set enrichment analyses were performed. In cellular experiments, AMHR2-overexpressing NSCLC cell lines were established, and the role of the AMH-AMHR2 pathway in cell proliferation with recombinant human AMH protein treatment was examined.
RESULTS: A total of 13 cases (16.5%) were positive for immunostaining in lung adenocarcinoma tissues; no positive signals were detected in lung squamous carcinoma tissues. Gene expression variation analysis using The Cancer Genome Atlas data showed that the expression of genes related to the cell cycle was downregulated in the AMHR2-high group. Cellular experiments showed that activation of the AMH-AMHR2 pathway suppressed cell proliferation.
CONCLUSIONS: In lung adenocarcinoma tissues with high expression of AMHR2, activation of the AMH-AMHR2 pathway may suppress cell proliferation.

BACKGROUND: First-line osimertinib plus chemotherapy significantly prolonged progression-free survival of patients with EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared to osimertinib, according to the FLAURA2 trial.
METHODS: We established a Markov model to compare the cost-effectiveness of osimertinib plus chemotherapy with that of osimertinib alone. Clinical data were obtained from the FLAURA and FLAURA2 trials, and additional data were extracted from online resources and publications. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the findings. We used A willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000 per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. The main outcomes were QALYs, overall costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), incremental net monetary benefit, and incremental net health benefit. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to patients\' mutation type and central nervous system (CNS) metastatic status.
RESULTS: In a 20-year time horizon, the ICER of osimertinib plus chemotherapy versus osimertinib alone was $223,727.1 per QALY gained. The sensitivity analyses identified the cost of osimertinib and the hazard ratio for overall survival as the top 2 influential factors and a 1.9% probability of osimertinib plus chemotherapy to be cost-effective. The subgroup analyses revealed ICERs of $132,614.1, $224,449.8, $201,464.1, and $130,159.7 per QALY gained for L858R mutations, exon 19 deletions, CNS metastases, and no CNS metastases subgroups, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: From the perspective of the United States health care system, osimertinib plus chemotherapy is not cost-effective compared to osimertinib alone for treatment-naïve patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC, but more favorable cost-effectiveness occurs in patients with L858R mutations and patients without baseline CNS metastases.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is a prevalent and severe form of malignant tumors worldwide. tRF-Leu-CAG, a recently discovered non-coding single-stranded small RNA derived from transfer RNA, has sparked interest in exploring its biological functions and potential molecular mechanisms in lung cancer.
METHODS: The abundance of tRF-Leu-CAG was measured via quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in 96 sets of lung cancer tissue samples obtained from clinical patients. Subsequently, both in vivo and in vitro experiments were conducted to validate the biological functions of tRF-Leu-CAG in lung cancer. Furthermore, an exploration of the potential target genes of tRF-Leu-CAG and its association with autophagy and drug resistance in lung cancer was undertaken.
RESULTS: Our analysis revealed a significant upregulation of tRF-Leu-CAG in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissues. Additionally, we observed that heightened expression of tRF-Leu-CAG significantly augmented the proliferation and migration of NSCLC cells, facilitated cell cycle progression, and suppressed apoptosis. Furthermore, we identified transcription elongation factor A3 (TCEA3) as a direct target gene of tRF-Leu-CAG. TCEA3 inhibited the proliferation and migration of NSCLC, and tRF-Leu-CAG promoted the proliferation and migration of NSCLC by mediating the silencing of TCEA3. Moreover, we demonstrated that the augmentation of paclitaxel resistance by tRF-Leu-CAG was contingent on autophagy. Finally, tRF-Leu-CAG notably accelerated tumor growth and promoted the process of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in vivo.
CONCLUSIONS: tRF-Leu-CAG promotes NSCLC tumor growth and metastasis by targeting TCEA3 and promotes paclitaxel resistance by enhancing cellular autophagy. These results provide potentially effective targets and therapeutic options for the clinical treatment of NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between the combination of platelet count and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (COP-NLR) and prognosis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapy with chemotherapy remains unclear. Thus, we investigated prognostic factors, including the COP-NLR, to identify patients who could benefit from the therapeutic efficacy of ICI combination therapy for advanced NSCLC. Furthermore, we evaluated the relationship between the COP-NLR score during ICI combination therapy and treatment response.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 88 patients with NSCLC who initially received ICI combination therapy. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). The prognostic factors were extracted using the Cox proportional hazards model. The relationship between COP-NLR score at 3 weeks after starting ICI combination therapy and a good response (complete response [CR] and partial response [PR]) to treatment was analyzed using the chi-square test.
RESULTS: The median OS was 15.7 months. In the multivariable analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) 2, distant metastatic sites ≥2, and baseline COP-NLR scores of 1, 2 were extracted as significant poor prognostic factors. The proportion of patients with CR and PR in the 3-week COP-NLR score of 0 group was significantly higher than that in scores of 1, 2 group.
CONCLUSIONS: Baseline COP-NLR, ECOG PS, and number of distant metastatic sites were prognostic factors in patients with NSCLC with ICI combination therapy. A lower 3-week COP-NLR was associated with a good response to treatment.