intensive care medicine

重症监护医学
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管移植器官的需求和可获得性之间存在差异,葡萄牙尚未实施受控循环死亡捐赠。这项研究旨在评估实施此类计划可能增加的器官捐赠。
    圣若昂大学中心医院重症监护医学科内的所有已故患者,2019年全年进行回顾性分析。将结果与同一时期在该医院中心收集的供体和器官的数量进行比较,估计了潜在的收益。组间变量的差异采用独立样本的t检验或连续变量的Mann-WhitneyU检验进行评估,分类变量采用卡方检验。
    在2019年期间,有152人在停药后死亡。其中10人在受控循环死亡后可能有资格捐赠。我们可以预计潜在的10个潜在捐助者的增加,每年移植活动的最高增长率为21%,对肾移植有较大影响。对于大多数患者来说,器官支持退出和死亡之间的时间超过120分钟,结果是由于撤回维持生命的措施和临床记录不足而引起的变化,低估了控制循环停止捐赠的可能性。
    这项研究有效地强调了控制性停循环捐赠的公共卫生益处。允许通过这种方法进行捐赠的立法代表了一种社会利益,并使永远不会符合脑死亡标准的患者能够捐赠器官,作为重症监护医学中生命终结过程的一部分,在一个完全的伦理协调的框架内。
    UNASSIGNED: Despite the discrepancy between demand and availability of organs for transplantation, controlled circulatory death donation has not been implemented in Portugal. This study aimed to estimate the potential increase in organ donation from implementing such a program.
    UNASSIGNED: All deceased patients within the intensive care medicine department at Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, throughout the year 2019, were subjected to retrospective analysis. Potential gain was estimated comparing the results with the number of donors and organs collected during the same period at this hospital center. Differences in variables between groups were assessed using t tests for independent samples or Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables, and chi-squared tests were used for categorical variables.
    UNASSIGNED: During 2019, 152 deaths occurred after withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies, 10 of which would have been potentially eligible for donation after controlled circulatory death. We can anticipate a potential increase of 10 prospective donors, a maximum 21% growth in yearly transplantation activity, with a greater impact on kidney transplantation. For most patients, the time between withdrawal of organ support and death surpassed 120 minutes, an outcome explained by variations in withdrawal of life-sustaining measures and insufficient clinical records, underestimating the potential for controlled circulatory arrest donation.
    UNASSIGNED: This study effectively highlights public health benefits of controlled circulatory arrest donation. Legislation allowing donation through this method represents a social gain and enables patients who will never meet brain death criteria to donate organs as part of the end-of-life process in intensive care medicine, within a framework of complete ethical alignment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在连续肾脏替代治疗期间,建议使用局部枸橼酸抗凝(RCA)。与全身抗凝相比,RCA提供更长的过滤器寿命,具有代谢性碱中毒和钙稳态受损的风险。令人惊讶的是,大多数RCA方案是为连续静脉-静脉血液透析或血液透析滤过而设计的.连续静脉-静脉血液滤过(CVVH)的有效方案很少见,尽管CVVH是高分子量清除的标准治疗方法。因此,我们评估了稀释后CVVH的新RCA方案。
    方法:这是一项单中心前瞻性介入研究,旨在评估稀释后CVVH的新RCA方案。我们招募了需要肾脏替代治疗的III期急性肾损伤手术患者。我们记录了72h治疗期间的透析和RCA数据以及血液动力学和实验室参数。主要终点是72h时的过滤器通畅。主要安全参数是代谢性碱中毒和严重的低钙血症。
    结果:我们纳入了38例接受66次治疗的患者。过滤器的平均寿命为66±12小时,在72小时时,66个过滤器中有44个(66%)是专利。在审查非CVVH相关的治疗停止后,所有过滤器的83%在72小时时通畅。递送的透析剂量为28±5ml/kgBW/h。血清肌酐水平,尿素和β2-微球蛋白从第0天到第3天显着降低。1例患者发生代谢性碱中毒。4例患者发生iCa++低于1.0mmol/L。没有发生柠檬酸盐积累。
    结论:我们描述了一种安全的,有效,和易于使用的RCA方案后稀释CVVH。该方案提供了一个长期和持续的过滤器寿命没有严重的不利影响。代谢性碱中毒和低钙血症的风险较低。使用这个协议,推荐的透析剂量可以安全地给药,有效清除中低分子量分子。
    背景:该研究得到了Heinrich-Heine大学杜塞尔多夫医学伦理委员会的批准(编号:2018-82KFogU)。该试验于2018年4月7日在该大学的当地研究登记册(编号:2018044660)中注册,并于2019年5月31日在ClinicalTrials.gov(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03969966)进行回顾性注册。
    BACKGROUND: Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) is recommended during continuous renal replacement therapy. Compared to systemic anticoagulation, RCA provides a longer filter lifespan with the risk of metabolic alkalosis and impaired calcium homeostasis. Surprisingly, most RCA protocols are designed for continuous veno-venous hemodialysis or hemodiafiltration. Effective protocols for continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) are rare, although CVVH is a standard treatment for high-molecular-weight clearance. Therefore, we evaluated a new RCA protocol for postdilution CVVH.
    METHODS: This is a monocentric prospective interventional study to evaluate a new RCA protocol for postdilution CVVH. We recruited surgical patients with stage III acute kidney injury who needed renal replacement therapy. We recorded dialysis and RCA data and hemodynamic and laboratory parameters during treatment sessions of 72 h. The primary endpoint was filter patency at 72 h. The major safety parameters were metabolic alkalosis and severe hypocalcemia at any time.
    RESULTS: We included 38 patients who underwent 66 treatment sessions. The mean filter lifespan was 66 ± 12 h, and 44 of 66 (66%) filters were patent at 72 h. After censoring for non-CVVH-related cessation of treatment, 83% of all filters were patent at 72 h. The delivered dialysis dose was 28 ± 5 ml/kgBW/h. The serum levels of creatinine, urea and beta2-microglobulin decreased significantly from day 0 to day 3. Metabolic alkalosis occurred in one patient. An iCa++ below 1.0 mmol/L occurred in four patients. Citrate accumulation did not occur.
    CONCLUSIONS: We describe a safe, effective, and easy-to-use RCA protocol for postdilution CVVH. This protocol provides a long and sustained filter lifespan without serious adverse effects. The risk of metabolic alkalosis and hypocalcemia is low. Using this protocol, a recommended dialysis dose can be safely administered with effective clearance of low- and middle-molecular-weight molecules.
    BACKGROUND: The study was approved by the medical ethics committee of Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf (No. 2018-82KFogU). The trial was registered in the local study register of the university (No: 2018044660) on 07/04/2018 and was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03969966) on 31/05/2019.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:重症监护病房(ICU)中使用的新兴技术中的肺超声(LUS)。已证明衍生的LUS通气评分与有创通气患者的死亡率有关。这项研究评估了有或没有ARDS(急性呼吸窘迫综合征)的危重患者的LUS通气评分的基线和早期变化对30天和90天死亡率的预测价值。
    方法:这是一项多中心前瞻性观察队列研究的事后分析,其中包括入住ICU且预期通气时间至少24小时的患者。我们限制参与基线时接受12个区域LUS检查且具有主要终点(30日死亡率)的患者.采用Logistic回归分析主要终点和次要终点。对完整患者队列和预定亚组(ARDS和无ARDS)进行分析。
    结果:共纳入442例患者,其中245人参加了第二次LUS考试。基线LUS通气评分与死亡率无关(1.02(95%CI:0.99-1.06),p=0.143)。这一发现在ARDS患者和无ARDS患者中没有什么不同。LUS评分的早期恶化与死亡率相关(2.09(95%CI:1.01-4.3),p=0.046)在无ARDS的患者中,但不是在ARDS患者或完整的患者队列中。
    结论:在这个危重病侵入性通气患者队列中,基线LUS通气评分与30日和90日死亡率无关.LUS通气评分的早期变化与死亡率相关,但仅限于无ARDS的患者。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov,IDNCT04482621。
    BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (LUS) in an emerging technique used in the intensive care unit (ICU). The derivative LUS aeration score has been shown to have associations with mortality in invasively ventilated patients. This study assessed the predictive value of baseline and early changes in LUS aeration scores in critically ill invasively ventilated patients with and without ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome) on 30- and 90-day mortality.
    METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter prospective observational cohort study, which included patients admitted to the ICU with an expected duration of ventilation for at least 24 h. We restricted participation to patients who underwent a 12-region LUS exam at baseline and had the primary endpoint (30-day mortality) available. Logistic regression was used to analyze the primary and secondary endpoints. The analysis was performed for the complete patient cohort and for predefined subgroups (ARDS and no ARDS).
    RESULTS: A total of 442 patients were included, of whom 245 had a second LUS exam. The baseline LUS aeration score was not associated with mortality (1.02 (95% CI: 0.99 - 1.06), p = 0.143). This finding was not different in patients with and in patients without ARDS. Early deterioration of the LUS score was associated with mortality (2.09 (95% CI: 1.01 - 4.3), p = 0.046) in patients without ARDS, but not in patients with ARDS or in the complete patient cohort.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of critically ill invasively ventilated patients, the baseline LUS aeration score was not associated with 30- and 90-day mortality. An early change in the LUS aeration score was associated with mortality, but only in patients without ARDS.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID NCT04482621.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    一名60多岁的妇女最初出现快速发作的左侧偏瘫,后来出现言语不清和左侧面部下垂。尽管排除了常见原因,随着双侧近端无力的发展,她的病情迅速发展,眼肌麻痹,共济失调,以及最终导致心肺骤停的锥体体征.广泛的调查,包括计算机断层扫描(CT),磁共振成像(MRI),和腰椎穿刺(LP),感染或血管病因阴性。神经传导研究(NCS)显示严重的周围神经损伤,尽管暂时诊断为格林-巴利综合征(GBS),考虑到中枢神经系统(CNS)受累,临床表现与Bickerstaff脑干脑炎(BBE)更加一致,尽管抗GM1和抗GQ1b自身抗体阴性。治疗包括通气支持,免疫球蛋白,和类固醇。此病例报告描述了BBE的罕见且具有挑战性的表现,并提醒临床医生对表现出快速发作的神经系统症状的患者采取系统的方法,并且BBE是临床诊断。
    A woman in her 60s initially presented with rapid-onset left-sided hemiparesis with later development of slurred speech and left-sided facial droop. Despite ruling out common causes, her condition rapidly progressed with the development of bilateral proximal weakness, ophthalmoplegia, ataxia, and pyramidal signs eventually leading to a cardiorespiratory arrest. Extensive investigations, including computerised tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and lumbar puncture (LP), were negative for infectious or vascular aetiologies. Nerve conduction studies (NCS) revealed severe peripheral nerve damage, and despite a provisional diagnosis of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), the clinical picture aligned more with Bickerstaff Brainstem Encephalitis (BBE) given the central nervous system (CNS) involvement, despite negative anti-GM1 and anti-GQ1b autoantibodies. Treatment involved ventilatory support, immunoglobulins, and steroids. This case report describes a rare and challenging presentation of BBE and reminds clinicians to have a systematic approach to a patient presenting with rapid onset neurological symptoms and that BBE is a clinical diagnosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:兰地洛,具有短半衰期(2.4-4分钟)的高心脏选择性药物,通常用作灌注器或推注应用来治疗心动过速性心律失常。一些小型研究表明,先前口服β受体阻滞剂的使用会导致对静脉β受体阻滞剂的有效反应。方法:这项研究调查了在患有急性心动过速性心律失常的重症监护患者中,先前的慢性口服β受体阻滞剂(Lβ)或先前没有慢性口服β受体阻滞剂(L-)的摄入是否会影响静脉推注剂量兰地洛尔的反应。结果:分析了30例患者(67[55-72]年)的疗效,10人(33.3%)和20人(66.7%)没有口服β受体阻滞剂治疗。14例患者的心律失常被诊断为心动过速性心房颤动,非流体依赖性,室上性心动过速16例。成功控制心率(Lβ4与L-7,p=1.00)和节律控制(Lβ3与L-6,p=1.00)在两组之间没有显着差异。在推注给药前后比较,两组均显示心率显着降低,两组间无显著差异(Lβ-26/minvs.L--33/min,p=0.528)。口服β受体阻滞剂治疗也不影响兰地洛尔推注后平均动脉血压的变化(Lβ-5mmHg与L--4mmHg,p=0.761)。结论:先前长期摄入β受体阻滞剂既不会影响推动剂量兰地洛尔在心率或心律控制中的有效性,也不会影响兰地洛尔推注前后心率或平均动脉血压的差异。
    Background: Landiolol, a highly cardioselective agent with a short half-life (2.4-4 min), is commonly used as a perfusor or bolus application to treat tachycardic arrhythmia. Some small studies suggest that prior oral β-blocker use results in a less effective response to intravenous β-blockers. Methods: This study investigated whether prior chronic oral β-blocker (Lβ) or no prior chronic oral β-blocker (L-) intake influences the response to intravenous push-dose Landiolol in intensive care patients with acute tachycardic arrhythmia. Results: The effects in 30 patients (67 [55-72] years) were analyzed, 10 (33.3%) with and 20 (66.7%) without prior oral β-blocker therapy. Arrhythmias were diagnosed as tachycardic atrial fibrillation in 14 patients and regular, non-fluid-dependent, supraventricular tachycardia in 16 cases. Successful heart rate control (Lβ 4 vs. L- 7, p = 1.00) and rhythm control (Lβ 3 vs. L- 6, p = 1.00) did not significantly differ between the two groups. Both groups showed a significant decrease in heart rate when comparing before and after the bolus administration, without significant differences between the two groups (Lβ -26/min vs. L- -33/min, p = 0.528). Oral β-blocker therapy also did not influence the change in mean arterial blood pressure after Landiolol bolus administration (Lβ -5 mmHg vs. L- -4 mmHg, p = 0.761). Conclusions: A prior chronic intake of β-blockers neither affected the effectiveness of push-dose Landiolol in heart rate or rhythm control nor impacted the difference in heart rate or mean arterial blood pressure before and after the Landiolol boli.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:毛细管再填充时间(CRT)定义为在施加压力以引起烫漂之后颜色返回到外部毛细管床所花费的时间。最近的研究证明了CRT在指导败血症的液体治疗中的益处。然而,医生在如何执行和解释CRT方面缺乏一致性,导致观察者对该评估工具的共识较低,这阻止了它在脓毒症临床环境中的可用性。
    目的:给医生一个简明的CRT概述,并探讨其在脓毒症管理中的可靠性和价值的最新证据。
    方法:叙述性回顾。
    结果:这篇叙述性综述总结了影响CRT值的因素,例如,年龄,性别,温度,光,观测技术,工作经验,训练水平和CRT测量方法的差异。合成了降低CRT变异性的方法。基于具有高度可重现性的CRT测量和出色的评分者间一致性的研究,我们推荐标准化的CRT评估方法.讨论了正常CRT值的阈值。总结了CRT在脓毒症管理不同阶段的应用。
    结论:最近的数据证实了CRT在危重患者中的价值。CRT应由训练有素的医生使用标准化方法检测,并减少环境相关因素的影响。它与严重感染有关,微循环,组织灌注反应,器官功能障碍和不良后果使这种方法成为脓毒症非常有吸引力的工具.进一步的研究应证实其在脓毒症管理中的价值。
    结论:作为一个简单的评估,尽管CRT尚未在床边广泛应用,但仍值得更多关注。CRT可以为护理人员提供患者的微循环状态,这可能有助于制定个性化护理计划,提高患者的护理质量和治疗效果。
    BACKGROUND: Capillary refill time (CRT) is defined as the time taken for color to return to an external capillary bed after pressure is applied to cause blanching. Recent studies demonstrated the benefits of CRT in guiding fluid therapy for sepsis. However, lack of consistency among physicians in how to perform and interpret CRT has led to a low interobserver agreement for this assessment tool, which prevents its availability in sepsis clinical settings.
    OBJECTIVE: To give physicians a concise overview of CRT and explore recent evidence on its reliability and value in the management of sepsis.
    METHODS: A narrative review.
    RESULTS: This narrative review summarizes the factors affecting CRT values, for example, age, sex, temperature, light, observation techniques, work experience, training level and differences in CRT measurement methods. The methods of reducing the variability of CRT are synthesized. Based on studies with highly reproducible CRT measurements and an excellent inter-rater concordance, we recommend the standardized CRT assessment method. The threshold of normal CRT values is discussed. The application of CRT in different phases of sepsis management is summarized.
    CONCLUSIONS: Recent data confirm the value of CRT in critically ill patients. CRT should be detected by trained physicians using standardized methods and reducing the effect of ambient-related factors. Its association with severe infection, microcirculation, tissue perfusion response, organ dysfunction and adverse outcomes makes this approach a very attractive tool in sepsis. Further studies should confirm its value in the management of sepsis.
    CONCLUSIONS: As a simple assessment, CRT deserves more attention even though it has not been widely applied at the bedside. CRT could provide nursing staff with patient\'s microcirculatory status, which may help to develop individualized nursing plans and improve the patient\'s care quality and treatment outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血小板在止血和炎性疾病中起关键作用。据报道,低血小板计数和活性与不良预后有关。本研究旨在探讨败血症患者血小板计数动态与院内道德之间的关系,并提供死亡风险的实时更新,以实现动态预测。
    我们进行了一个多队列,回顾性,观察性研究包括eICU合作研究数据库(eICU-CRD)和重症监护医学信息集市(MIMIC-IV)数据库中败血症患者的数据。联合潜伏类别模型(JLCM)用于识别脓毒症患者随时间的异质性血小板计数轨迹。我们使用每个轨迹中的分段Cox风险模型评估了不同轨迹模式与28天住院死亡率之间的关联。我们通过接收器工作特性曲线下的面积来评估我们的动态预测模型的性能,一致性指数(C指数),准确度,灵敏度,和在预定义时间点计算的特异性。
    确定了四个血小板计数轨迹亚组,它们对应于不同的住院死亡风险。包括血小板计数在早期阶段并未显着提高预测准确性(第1天C-indexDynamicvsC-indexWeibull:0.713vs0.714)。然而,我们的模型在一段时间内表现优于静态生存模型(第14天C-indexDynamicvsC-indexWeibull:0.644vs0.617).
    对于重症监护病房的败血症患者,血小板计数的快速下降是一个关键的预后因素,和连续血小板测量与预后相关。
    UNASSIGNED: Platelets play a critical role in hemostasis and inflammatory diseases. Low platelet count and activity have been reported to be associated with unfavorable prognosis. This study aims to explore the relationship between dynamics in platelet count and in-hospital morality among septic patients and to provide real-time updates on mortality risk to achieve dynamic prediction.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a multi-cohort, retrospective, observational study that encompasses data on septic patients in the eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD) and the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. The joint latent class model (JLCM) was utilized to identify heterogenous platelet count trajectories over time among septic patients. We assessed the association between different trajectory patterns and 28-day in-hospital mortality using a piecewise Cox hazard model within each trajectory. We evaluated the performance of our dynamic prediction model through area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, concordance index (C-index), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity calculated at predefined time points.
    UNASSIGNED: Four subgroups of platelet count trajectories were identified that correspond to distinct in-hospital mortality risk. Including platelet count did not significantly enhance prediction accuracy at early stages (day 1 C-indexDynamic  vs C-indexWeibull: 0.713 vs 0.714). However, our model showed superior performance to the static survival model over time (day 14 C-indexDynamic  vs C-indexWeibull: 0.644 vs 0.617).
    UNASSIGNED: For septic patients in an intensive care unit, the rapid decline in platelet counts is a critical prognostic factor, and serial platelet measures are associated with prognosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    标准剂量的镇痛和镇静药物给予重症监护患者。需要更好地检查所得的血液浓度范围和相应的临床反应。这项研究的目的是描述每日剂量,测量的血液浓度,和危重患者的临床反应。目的还在于有助于建立所研究药物的全血浓度参考值。
    对一所大学医院的302名普通重症监护病房(ICU)入院的前瞻性数据进行的描述性研究。十种药物(可乐定,芬太尼,吗啡,右美托咪定,氯胺酮,酮吡米酮,咪达唑仑,扑热息痛,异丙酚,和硫喷妥钠)进行了调查,并记录每日剂量。每天采集两次血样,并测量药物浓度。使用里士满激动镇静量表(RASS)和数字评定量表(NRS)记录临床反应。
    药物剂量在推荐剂量范围内。所有10种药物的血液浓度在队列中显示出很大的差异,但只有3%高于可乐定(122中的57例)和咪达唑仑(122中的38例)占主导地位的治疗间隔。RASS和NRS与药物浓度无关。
    在ICU环境中使用镇痛和镇静药物的推荐剂量间隔,并定期监测临床反应,如RASS和NRS,导致97%的浓度低于治疗间隔的上限。这项研究有助于这10种药物的全血药物浓度参考值。
    UNASSIGNED: Standard dosages of analgesic and sedative drugs are given to intensive care patients. The resulting range of blood concentrations and corresponding clinical responses need to be better examined. The purpose of this study was to describe daily dosages, measured blood concentrations, and clinical responses in critically ill patients. The purpose was also to contribute to establishing whole blood concentration reference values of the drugs investigated.
    UNASSIGNED: A descriptive study of prospectively collected data from 302 admissions to a general intensive care unit (ICU) at a university hospital. Ten drugs (clonidine, fentanyl, morphine, dexmedetomidine, ketamine, ketobemidone, midazolam, paracetamol, propofol, and thiopental) were investigated, and daily dosages recorded. Blood samples were collected twice daily, and drug concentrations were measured. Clinical responses were registered using Richmond agitation-sedation scale (RASS) and Numeric rating scale (NRS).
    UNASSIGNED: Drug dosages were within recommended dose ranges. Blood concentrations for all 10 drugs showed a wide variation within the cohort, but only 3% were above therapeutic interval where clonidine (57 of 122) and midazolam (38 of 122) dominated. RASS and NRS were not correlated to drug concentrations.
    UNASSIGNED: Using recommended dose intervals for analgesic and sedative drugs in the ICU setting combined with regular monitoring of clinical responses such as RASS and NRS leads to 97% of concentrations being below the upper limit in the therapeutic interval. This study contributes to whole blood drug concentration reference values regarding these 10 drugs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在重症监护病房(ICU)收治的危重患者中,液体积聚与不良结局相关。ICU中的流体施用可能是ICU患者中流体积聚的临床相关来源。然而,程度是未知的,并且没有标准定义。我们的目标是提供有关液体积聚的流行病学数据,危险因素,使用流体去除策略,患者预后并描述ICU中当前的液体管理实践。
    方法:我们将进行一项为期14天的国际初始队列研究,包括至少1000名急性入住ICU的成年患者。数据将从基线和每天从ICU入院到出院的医疗记录和实验室报告中收集,最长为28天。随访将在纳入后的第90天进行。主要结果是液体积聚的患者数量。次要结果包括液体积聚的天数,使用主动流体去除,第28天没有生命支持的存活天数,第90天的存活天数和出院天数,第90天的全因死亡率。此外,我们将评估液体蓄积的危险因素及其与90日死亡率的关系,并报告液体给药类型.
    结论:这项国际初始队列研究将提供有关成人ICU患者的液体管理和液体积聚的当代流行病学数据。
    BACKGROUND: Fluid accumulation is associated with adverse outcomes in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Fluid administration in the ICU may be a clinically relevant source of fluid accumulation in ICU patients. However, the extent is unknown, and no standard definition exists. We aim to provide epidemiological data on fluid accumulation, risk factors, use of fluid removal strategies, patient outcomes and describe current fluid administration practices in the ICU.
    METHODS: We will conduct an international 14-day inception cohort study including a minimum of 1000 acutely admitted adult ICU patients. Data will be collected from medical records and laboratory reports at baseline and daily from ICU admission to discharge with a maximum of 28 days. Follow-up will be performed on day 90 after inclusion. The primary outcome is the number of patients with fluid accumulation. Secondary outcomes include the number of days with fluid accumulation, use of active fluid removal, days alive without life support at day 28, days alive and out of hospital day 90, and all-cause mortality at day 90. Furthermore, we will assess risk factors for fluid accumulation and its association with 90-day mortality and report on the types of fluid administration.
    CONCLUSIONS: This international inception cohort study will provide contemporary epidemiological data on fluid administration and fluid accumulation in adult ICU patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管进行了几项试验以优化重症监护病房(ICU)患者的氧合范围,尚未有研究就脓毒症患者的最佳动脉血氧分压(PaO2)范围达成普遍建议.我们的目的是评估与保守的动脉血氧分压相比,相对较高的动脉血氧分压是否与脓毒症患者的生存期更长有关。
    从韩国脓毒症联盟全国注册,根据倾向评分,接受自由PaO2(PaO2≥80mmHg)治疗的患者在入住ICU后的前3天与接受保守PaO2(PaO2<80mmHg)治疗的患者为1:1.主要结果是28天死亡率。
    在1211个自由和1211个保守PaO2组的前3天,PaO2的中值是,分别,第1110.0(93.4-132.0)天107.2(92.0-134.0)和84.4(71.2-112.0),第2天80.0(71.0-100.0),第3天106.0(91.9-127.4)和78.0(69.0-94.5)(所有p值<0.001)。自由PaO2组显示在第28天死亡的可能性较低(14.9%;风险比[HR],0.79;95%置信区间[CI]0.65-0.96;p值=0.017)。ICU(HR,0.80;95%CI0.67-0.96;p值=0.019)和医院死亡率(HR,0.84;95%CI0.73-0.97;p值=0.020)在自由PaO2组中较低。在ICU第2天(p值=0.007)和第3天(p值<0.001),但不是ICU第1天,与保守氧合相比,高氧与更好的预后相关。,28天死亡率最低,尤其是在100mmHg左右的PaO2。
    在败血症的危重患者中,与保守性PaO2相比,ICU前3日PaO2较高(≥80mmHg)与28日死亡率较低相关.
    Although several trials were conducted to optimize the oxygenation range in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, no studies have yet reached a universal recommendation on the optimal a partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) range in patients with sepsis. Our aim was to evaluate whether a relatively high arterial oxygen tension is associated with longer survival in sepsis patients compared with conservative arterial oxygen tension.
    From the Korean Sepsis Alliance nationwide registry, patients treated with liberal PaO2 (PaO2 ≥ 80 mm Hg) were 1:1 matched with those treated with conservative PaO2 (PaO2 < 80 mm Hg) over the first three days after ICU admission according to the propensity score. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality.
    The median values of PaO2 over the first three ICU days in 1211 liberal and 1211 conservative PaO2 groups were, respectively, 107.2 (92.0-134.0) and 84.4 (71.2-112.0) in day 1110.0 (93.4-132.0) and 80.0 (71.0-100.0) in day 2, and 106.0 (91.9-127.4) and 78.0 (69.0-94.5) in day 3 (all p-values < 0.001). The liberal PaO2 group showed a lower likelihood of death at day 28 (14.9%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.96; p-value = 0.017). ICU (HR, 0.80; 95% CI 0.67-0.96; p-value = 0.019) and hospital mortalities (HR, 0.84; 95% CI 0.73-0.97; p-value = 0.020) were lower in the liberal PaO2 group. On ICU days 2 (p-value = 0.007) and 3 (p-value < 0.001), but not ICU day 1, hyperoxia was associated with better prognosis compared with conservative oxygenation., with the lowest 28-day mortality, especially at PaO2 of around 100 mm Hg.
    In critically ill patients with sepsis, higher PaO2 (≥ 80 mm Hg) during the first three ICU days was associated with a lower 28-day mortality compared with conservative PaO2.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号