OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) for submucosal tumors (SMTs) has been technically challenging. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of EFTR for upper gastrointestinal (GI) SMTs, including extraluminal lesions.
METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 232 patients with SMTs who underwent EFTR from January 2014 to August 2023. Clinicopathologic characteristics, procedure-related parameters, adverse events (AEs), and follow-up outcomes were assessed in all patients.
RESULTS: The en-bloc resection and en-bloc with R0 resection rates were 98.7% and 96.1%, respectively. The average endoscopic tumor size measured 17.2 ± 8.7 mm, ranging from 6 to 50 mm. The resection time and suture time were 49.0 ± 19.4 min and 22.5 ± 11.6 min, respectively. In all, 39 lesions (16.8%) exhibited predominantly extraluminal growth. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) were the predominant pathology, accounting for 78.4% of the cases. Twenty-one patients (9.1%) encountered complications, including pneumothorax (1/232, 0.43%), hydrothorax (1/232, 0.43%), localized peritonitis (3/232, 1.29%), and fever (16/232, 6.9%). Although the incidence of postoperative fever was notably higher in the predominantly extraluminal group (7/39, 17.9%) compared to the predominantly intraluminal group (9/193, 4.7%, P = 0.008), there were no significant differences in outcomes of the EFTR procedure. No instances of recurrence were observed during the mean follow-up period of 3.7 ± 2.3 years.
CONCLUSIONS: EFTR was found to be feasible, safe, and effective for resecting upper GI SMTs, including lesions with predominantly extraluminal growth. Further validation in a prospective study is warranted.

BACKGROUND: Nonadherence to imatinib is common in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), which is associated with poor prognosis and financial burden. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the adherence rate in patients with GIST and subsequently develop a model based on machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques to identify the associated factors and predict the risk of imatinib nonadherence.
METHODS: All eligible patients completed four sections of questionnaires. After the data set was preprocessed, statistically significance variables were identified and further processed to modeling. Six ML and four DL algorithms were applied for modeling, including eXtreme gradient boosting, light gradient boosting machine (LGBM), categorical boosting, random forest, support vector machine, artificial neural network, multilayer perceptron, NaiveBayes, TabNet, and Wide&Deep. The optimal ML model was used to identify potential factors for predicting adherence.
RESULTS: A total of 397 GIST patients were recruited. Nonadherence was observed in 185 patients (53.4%). LGBM exhibited superior performance, achieving a mean f1_score of 0.65 and standard deviation of 0.12. The predominant indicators for nonadherent prediction of imatinib were cognitive functioning, whether to perform therapeutic drug monitoring (if_TDM), global health status score, social support, and gender.
CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first real-world investigation using ML techniques to predict risk factors associated with imatinib nonadherence in patients with GIST. By highlighting the potential factors and identifying high-risk patients, the multidisciplinary medical team can devise targeted strategies to effectively address the daily challenges of treatment adherence.

Somatic KIT activating mutations drive most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Disease progression eventually develops with first-line imatinib, commonly due to KIT secondary mutations, and different kinase inhibitors have various levels of treatment efficacy dependent on specific acquired resistance mutations. Ripretinib is a broad-spectrum switch-control KIT/PDGFRA tyrosine kinase inhibitor for patients with advanced GIST who received prior treatment with three or more kinase inhibitors, including imatinib. Exploratory baseline circulating tumor DNA analysis from the second-line INTRIGUE trial determined that patients with advanced GIST previously treated with imatinib harboring primary KIT exon 11 mutations and secondary resistance mutations restricted to KIT exons 17/18 had greater clinical benefit with ripretinib versus sunitinib. We describe the rationale and design of INSIGHT (NCT05734105), an ongoing Phase III open-label study of ripretinib versus sunitinib in patients with advanced GIST previously treated with imatinib exclusively harboring KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations detected by circulating tumor DNA.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05734105 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is rare, but it is the most common mesenchymal tumor (a type of tumor that develops from cells which give rise to soft tissues) of the gastrointestinal tract. The primary treatment for advanced GIST is medication that targets the abnormal mechanisms in cancer cells in order to block tumor growth and spread. Ripretinib is an inhibitor of a protein known as KIT, which is a member of the tyrosine kinase protein family and is involved in the growth of GIST. In a Phase III clinical trial called INTRIGUE, the effects of ripretinib and another receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, sunitinib, were compared in patients with advanced GIST previously treated with the drug imatinib. An exploratory analysis from the INTRIGUE trial that characterized baseline circulating tumor DNA in the blood showed a greater clinical benefit with ripretinib versus sunitinib in patients with gene mutations solely occurring in KIT exon 11 + 17 and/or 18 (exon 11 + 17/18). This article describes the rationale and design for a Phase III clinical trial called INSIGHT that will evaluate the benefit of ripretinib compared with sunitinib in patients with advanced GIST whose tumors have mutations in KIT exon 11 and KIT exon 17 and/or 18. Patients will receive ripretinib or sunitinib in 6-week cycles, and investigators will assess survival without cancer progression as the primary outcome, and overall survival, and response of the tumor to these two drugs as secondary outcomes.

UNASSIGNED: We conducted a multicenter study on classical laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) and LECS-related procedures to retrospectively clarify the safety, problems, and mid-term outcomes of these methods after their coverage by the national health insurance.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 201 patients who underwent classical LECS/LECS-related procedures for gastric submucosal tumors (G-SMTs) in 21 institutions affiliated with the Laparoscopy Endoscopy Cooperative Surgery Study Group from April 2014 to March 2016 were included. Data was retrospectively obtained from the patients\' charts.
UNASSIGNED: The most common surgical procedure was classical LECS (155 patients, 77.1%), non-exposed endoscopic wall inversion surgery (22 patients, 11.4%), a combination of laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches to neoplasia with non-exposure technique (16 patients, 8%), and closed LECS (two patients, 1%). Only six (3%) patients underwent LECS with gastrostomy. The mean operative time and blood loss were 188.4 (70-462) minutes and 23.3 (0-793) g, respectively. Ten (5%) patients developed postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification grade II or higher). Two patients needed reoperation due to postoperative bleeding or anastomotic leakage. All tumors were resected with negative margins. A total of 127 (63.2%) patients underwent follow-up observations for over 36 months, one of whom had a recurrence of peritoneal dissemination and one had poor oral intake.
UNASSIGNED: Classical LECS and LECS-related procedures for G-SMTs have favorable short/mid-term outcomes.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract, frequently characterized by mutations in the KIT or PDGFRA genes. This case report details the complex clinical course of a 71-year-old female with a history of HIV and metastatic GIST presenting with acute abdominal symptoms indicative of perforated viscus. Initial imaging revealed a massive pneumoperitoneum and a large abdominal mass, necessitating immediate surgical intervention. The patient underwent multiple surgeries, including bowel resections and colostomy creation, to address the extensive tumor burden and complications. Postoperatively, she required intensive care management, including mechanical ventilation, vasopressor support, and hemodialysis for acute kidney injury. Pathological examination confirmed metastatic GIST with extensive mesenteric and omental involvement. Immunohistochemical staining was positive for CD117 (c-KIT) and DOG-1. Despite aggressive surgical and supportive measures, the patient\'s condition highlighted the significant challenges in managing advanced GIST with perforation. This case highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach, integrating surgical, medical, and intensive care to optimize outcomes. The prognosis of GIST varies widely, with localized tumors having favorable outcomes following resection, while metastatic cases often face a poorer prognosis despite advances in targeted therapies. This case exemplifies the critical need for personalized treatment plans and ongoing research to improve the management and prognosis of GIST patients.

BACKGROUND: Imatinib (IMA) has received approval as the primary treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Nonetheless, approximately half of the patients with advanced GIST show disease advancement following IMA treatment. Presently, the efficacy of secondary and tertiary medications in addressing various GIST secondary mutations is somewhat restricted. Consequently, there is a significant medical demand for the creation of kinase inhibitors that extensively block secondary drug-resistant mutations in advanced GIST. Ripretinib (RPT) is a new, switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitors that can suppress different mutations of KIT and PDGFRA via a dual mechanism of action.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the literature on RPT to assess an effective, safe, and successful treatment strategy against advanced GIST.
METHODS: The present systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were screened from January 1, 2003 to May 1, 2024.
RESULTS: A total of 4 studies were included, with a total of 507 patients enrolled. The objective response rate (ORR) of the RPT-treated advanced GIST was 17% (95%CI: 0.11-0.27), while the disease control rate (DCR) was 66% (95%CI: 0.59-0.73). The overall occurrence of adverse events with varying degrees was 97% (95%CI: 0.93-1), whereas that of grade ≥ 3 adverse reactions was 42% (95%CI: 0.28-0.63). The sensitivity analysis revealed that omitting some studies did not yield statistically notable variances in the aggregate data regarding the ORR, DCR, and the occurrence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher. The publication bias was absent because no significant asymmetry was observed in Begg\'s funnel plot in all studies.
CONCLUSIONS: RPT has favorable efficacy profiles in GIST patients, but the adverse reactions are obvious, and patient management needs to be strengthened to achieve better safety and tolerability.

BACKGROUND: In the realm of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), understanding the molecular landscape and prognostic factors is crucial for effective management. The deiodinase 3 gene (DIO3), known for its role in thyroid hormone regulation and cell proliferation, has emerged as a potential player in GIST pathogenesis. Our study investigated DIO3 expression in GIST samples and its correlation with tumor characteristics, aiming to enhance prognostic stratification and personalized treatment strategies.
METHODS: Using a retrospective design, we analyzed data and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples of patients diagnosed with GIST. The study cohort comprised 33 patients, predominantly female, with a median age of 66 years. The tumor characteristics were meticulously documented, including location, size, mitotic count, risk classification, and immunohistochemical markers. Gene expression analysis of DIO3 was conducted using FFPE samples, with a focus on relative quantification and association with immunohistochemical markers and prognostic risk.
RESULTS: DIO3 overexpression was observed in 69.70% of tumors, while underexpression was noted in 30.30% of cases. Association analyses revealed intriguing insights. A notable association was identified between DIO3 expression and the frequency of DOG1, suggesting a potential interplay between these markers in GIST pathobiology. Furthermore, increased DIO3 expression was significantly higher in very low/low-risk prognostic patients, hinting at a possible link between DIO3 levels and tumor progression prognosis.
CONCLUSIONS:  The intricate interplay between DIO3 expression and GIST characteristics uncovered in this study underscores the potential of molecular markers in refining prognostic assessments and therapeutic strategies for GIST patients.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are uncommon tumors typically found in the stomach, with an even rarer appearance in the jejunum. These tumors are often discovered incidentally, given their nonspecific presentation. We present a case of chronic iron deficiency anemia in a patient with symptomatic GIST involving the proximal jejunum requiring robot-assisted resection with primary anastomosis. Pathological examination of the excised GIST revealed positive immunoreactivity for cKIT, DOG1, and CD37. This case highlights the importance of considering GIST as a differential diagnosis for chronic anemia and emphasizes the critical role of CT imaging in its detection and management.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare mesenchymal tumors occurring in the gastrointestinal tract particularly the stomach or small intestine originating from interstitial cells of Cajal. This case report describes a 50-year-old postmenopausal female presenting with a gradually increasing abdominal mass which clinically was thought to be a neoplasm originating in the ovaries. A clinical and imaging diagnosis of primary ovarian malignancy was made but during laparotomy, a mesenteric component to the malignancy as well as bilateral ovarian cysts were seen. The mass was removed with care and histopathological analysis confirmed it to be GIST. Follow-up of the patient was done for three years and there was no sign of any disease in the patient and she had an uncomplicated postoperative period. This case describes the intricacy of GISTs\' diagnosis, the significance of detailed intraoperative analysis, and appropriate postoperative surveillance. Differences and similarities with other similar cases shed light on how such patients present themselves for treatment, thus encouraging differentiated care. Supervisory care is therefore vital in the monitoring of the patient for prolonged periods and to check for any relapse.

Understanding the determinants of long-term liver metastasis (LM) outcomes in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients is crucial. We established the feature selection model of intratumoral microbiome at the surgery, achieving robust predictive accuracies of 0.953 and 0.897 AUCs in discovery (n = 74) and validation (n = 34) cohorts, respectively. Notably, despite the significant reduction in LM occurrence with adjuvant imatinib (AI) treatment, intratumoral microbiome exerted independently stronger effects on post-operative LM. Employing both 16S and full-length rRNA sequencing, we pinpoint intracellular Shewanella algae as a foremost LM risk factor in both AI- and non-AI-treated patients. Experimental validation confirmed S. algae\'s intratumoral presence in GIST, along with migration/invasion-promoting effects on GIST cells. Furthermore, S. algae promoted LM and impeded AI treatment in metastatic mouse models. Our findings advocate for incorporating intratumoral microbiome evaluation at surgery, and propose S. algae as a therapeutic target for LM suppression in GIST.