UNASSIGNED: Mandibular reconstruction has historically been challenging due to the complex, highly functional, and esthetic nature of the anatomy. The most common etiologies of these defects requiring resection include trauma, benign tumors, and malignant pathology. Mandibular defects have been treated with little consideration for neural reconstruction, leaving patient\'s orally incompetent with associated social stigma. Although recent advances in reconstructive techniques improve oral rehabilitation, immediate inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) reconstruction has not been widely adapted.
UNASSIGNED: Here-in we seek to discuss the innovations of neural reconstruction of large segment mandibular defects and associated IAN defects and present an example case performed at Naval Medical Center San Diego (NMCSD).
UNASSIGNED: Pertinent literature discussing maxillofacial reconstruction and nerve repair using autogenous nerve harvest and allograft was queried from available online resources.
UNASSIGNED: Six patients have received immediate reconstruction of the IAN using processed nerve allograft over the past three years. All obtained sensation to S3 within six months of surgery.
UNASSIGNED: IAN repair using nerve allografts in conjunction with free flap reconstruction for large mandibular defects is a viable treatment and should be the new paradigm in maxillofacial reconstruction as it provides substantial quantifiable and qualitative improvements in social, functional, and esthetic outcomes of care.

暂无摘要。

Background: Primary malignant bone tumors are most commonly associated with mutilating surgical procedures that can significantly disturb the motor development of a young patient and are frequently affiliated with major postoperative complications. Unfortunately, despite available autologous tissue donor sites, artificial materials are still most commonly used for the reconstruction of post-resection defects. Reconstructive microsurgery is increasingly recognized as an effective method of functional reconstruction, creating the possibility of performing limb-sparing surgery (LSS) with significant limitation of major postoperative complications at the same time. Methods: The study group consisted of 9 pediatric patients diagnosed with primary malignant bone tumor in the limb location. In order to perform microvascular reconstruction, 9 free fibula flaps were used in combination with a bone allograft (Capanna method). The functional outcome of the reconstruction was assessed on the basis of the MSTS (Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Scoring System) scale. Results: The presented analysis proves the effectiveness of this reconstructive procedure and the possibility of performing LSS with reasonable functional outcomes after appropriate patient qualification. In this study, all limbs included were spared. In all cases, the R0 surgical margins were achieved and no reports of local recurrences were reported during the follow-up. The average score on the MSTS scale was 27/30 points. Conclusions: Microvascular reconstructive surgery is an individually personalized and highly effective method of treating patients with primary bone tumors in the limb location and provides satisfactory functional outcomes.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the risk of osteoradionecrosis and implant survival in oral cancer patients undergoing immediate dental implants during jaw reconstruction, termed \"Jaw in a Day\" (JIAD), with those receiving no implants or delayed implants (non-JIAD).
METHODS: Clinicopathologic data were collected from prospectively enrolled JIAD patients (n = 10, 29 implants) and retrospectively from non-JIAD patients (n = 117, 86 implants). Survival analyses were performed to assess implant survival and osteoradionecrosis-free survival.
RESULTS: Osteoradionecrosis occurred in 0 % of JIAD cases compared to 19.3 % in non-JIAD cases without implants and 71.4 % in non-JIAD cases with delayed implants (p = 0.008). Osteoradionecrosis-free survival was significantly better in the JIAD group than the non-JIAD group (p = 0.0059). Implants in the JIAD group all survived regardless of radiation therapy (29/29, 100 %) and 95.1 % (58/61) of implants survived in delayed implants in non-irradiated fibula without radiotherapy. Meanwhile, only 11 of 25 implants placed in irradiated fibula flaps survived, even when the implants were placed after a median time interval of 624 days after radiotherapy, and none of them were earlier than 360 days. The survival analysis revealed a significant difference (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: JIAD appears to offer superior outcomes in terms of implant survival and osteoradionecrosis prevention compared to delayed implant placement. Placing implants in irradiated fibula, even after years, significantly poses high risk of implant failure and osteoradionecrosis. JIAD represents a promising approach for optimal rehabilitation, particularly in oral cancer patients requiring postoperative radiotherapy. Proper positioning and orientation of implants and flaps are crucial for implant survival.

BACKGROUND: Cervical spine defects result in spinal instability, putting the spinal cord and vertebral arteries at risk of damage and possibly devastating neurological injuries. The fibula free flap can span the spinal defects for stability. There is a paucity of literature on this technique.
METHODS: Multi-institutional retrospective case series reviewing patients who underwent cervical spine reconstruction with a fibula free flap. Patient demographic information, comorbidities, characteristics of cervical spine defects, and free flap complications were collected.
RESULTS: A total of 1187 fibula free flaps across 10 different institutions were reviewed. Thirteen patients (1.09%) underwent cervical spine reconstruction with a fibula free flap. Average age was 52.3 years old with an age range of 12-79 years. There were six males (46.1%) and seven females (53.8%). The most common defect etiology was infection (n = 6, 46.1%). Most commonly involved cervical spine level of the defect was C5 (n = 10) followed by C6 (n = 9) and C4 (n = 8). The majority of reconstructed defects spanned three or more cervical levels, (n = 9, 69.2%). Facial artery was the most common arterial anastomosis (n = 8). Eight patients (61.5%) required a tracheostomy during their postoperative course. None of the patients had symptomatic or radiographic nonunion.
CONCLUSIONS: This case series demonstrates that a vascularized fibula flap is a potential reconstructive option for cervical spine defects, especially in defects greater than three cervical levels, in the setting of infection, and previously radiated patients.
METHODS: Level 4 Laryngoscope, 2024.

UNASSIGNED: To investigate the feasibility of leg wound closure and reconstruction of maxillofacial soft defect by a fusiform-designed skin paddle in fibula free flap (FFF).
UNASSIGNED: Fifty patients who underwent FFF for reconstruction of maxillofacial soft defect were divided into two groups. The fusiform group (20 patients) was treated using a fusiform-designed skin paddle in FFF (skin paddle width less than 2 cm), and leg wound was closed using primary suturing. Reconstruction of the maxillofacial soft defect or filling of dead space was achieved by folding the fusiform skin paddle. The conventional group (30 patients) was treated using the conventional-designed skin paddle (skin paddle width no less than 2.5 cm). The leg wound was closed using mattress suturing or skin graft, while reconstruction of the maxillofacial soft defect or filling of dead space by conventional way. The average postoperative length of hospital stay, healing time of leg wound, and post-surgical complications were recorded at least 6 months after the surgery.
UNASSIGNED: Compared with traditional method, the fusiform-designed skin paddle reduced the average healing time of the leg wound (fusiform group: 11.05 days, conventional group: 14.77 days, P < 0.05). The average length-to-width ratio in fusiform group was significantly greater than that of in conventional group (fusiform group: 5.85, conventional group: 2.93, P < 0.05), and no difference was observed on the graft size of skin paddle between two groups (fusiform group: 23.13, conventional group: 27.13, P > 0.05). The post-surgical early complications of the leg wound in the conventional group were higher than that of in the fusiform group (fusiform group: 0%, conventional group: 6.67%), while the post-surgical late complication of the donor site between the two groups showed no case. Healing disorders of maxillofacial soft reconstruction in the conventional group were higher than that of in the fusiform group (fusiform group: 5.26%, conventional group: 20.69%).
UNASSIGNED: Fusiform-designed skin paddle for closure of the leg wound and maxillofacial soft defect is a feasible alternative to the conventional- designed skin paddle. The fusiform- designed skin paddle resulted in the less postoperative length of hospital stay, shorter healing time of leg wound and less complication.

Introduction Head and neck cancer with mandibular invasion often necessitates composite resection, leading to defects requiring reconstruction. Microvascular fibula free flap (FFF) surgery is a common approach for this purpose. In this study, we focus on our experience with condyle sacrifice, emphasizing treatment outcomes and functional results. Additionally, we highlight a contemporary perspective by discussing surgical techniques and radiographic outcomes based on a 3D analysis of neo-condyle placement on CT imaging. Methods We studied 23 patients who had undergone segmental mandibulectomy requiring FFF reconstruction between 2009 and 2020. These were all performed by the same surgeon (M.M.) at an academic tertiary care center. Twenty-three reconstructions included condyle sacrifice. Retrospective chart review was performed with a focus on treatment, functional outcomes, and surgical technique. Results A total of 23 patients were included in the study group (13 females and 10 males) with a mean age of 58.1 years. The most common surgical indication was for oncologic purposes (n=9; 39.1%). Twenty (87%) patients required tracheostomy, and all were decannulated. In terms of surgical complications, two (8.7%) patients had a degree of arterial insufficiency and two (8.7%) developed delayed infections. The average inpatient stay was 5.61 days, with a subsequent average clinic follow-up after 16.9 days. CT or MRI imaging was available for 21 (91.3%) patients, showing 14 (66.7%) neo-condyles within the glenoid fossa. Fifteen (71.4%) patients had some element of anterior displacement (average=6.27 mm), and seven (33.3%) patients had a component of lateral displacement (average=2.23 mm). Three (13%) patients died during the follow-up period. Eighteen (90%) of the surviving patients returned to an oral diet within an average of 24.9 days. All patients returned to normal interincisal distance by 12 months. All FFFs, with and without complications, remained viable. Conclusion We achieved favorable oral function outcomes in the majority of our patients. Intriguingly, although radiographic evidence revealed anterior and/or lateral displacement of the neo-condyle, there was no observed correlation with the resumption of oral diet, trismus, or crossbite among these patients.

BACKGROUND: Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the mandible is an unfortunate potential sequela of radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. In advanced cases of ORN, mandibulectomy, and free fibula flap reconstruction are required. We hypothesized that patients undergoing fibula free flap reconstruction and mandibulectomy for ORN pose unique challenges and experience more complications than patients undergoing fibula free flaps after oncologic mandibulectomy.
METHODS: After IRB approval, we created a database of all free fibula flaps for mandible reconstruction from April 2005 through February 2019. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for patient and surgical characteristics and postoperative outcomes.
RESULTS: Four-hundred seventy-nine patients met the inclusion criteria (168 ORN vs. 311 non-ORN patients). Propensity-matching was performed based on age, BMI, smoking status, preoperative chemotherapy, and virtual surgery planning use, which yielded 159 patients in each group. ORN patients received more double-skin-island fibula flaps than non-OR patients (20.8% vs. 5.7%, p < 0.001). Recipient artery other than the facial artery was utilized more commonly in ORN patients (42.1% vs. 17.0%, p < 0.001). In the unmatched cohort, ORN patients had higher rates of delayed wound healing (26.2% vs. 16.8%, p = 0.01) and surgical site infections (21.4% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.02). Rates of flap loss, return to the operating room, hematoma, operative time, and length of stay were similar between the groups. On logistic regression analysis, osteoradionecrosis was an independent risk factor for delayed wound healing.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on these data, mandibular reconstruction with fibula flaps for osteoradionecrosis appears more complicated than mandible reconstruction following de novo cancer resection. Surgeons should anticipate employing two skin islands for intraoral and extraoral resurfacing, utilizing unconventional recipient vessels, and managing the delayed wound healing that ensues more commonly than non-ORN patients.

The Alberta reconstructive technique (ART) is an innovative surgical procedure performed on patients undergoing primary jaw resection and reconstruction. The ART procedure was developed in collaboration with the Institute for Reconstructive Sciences in Medicine and the Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alberta.